KeiserC
VIP Member
- Mar 18, 2017
- 946
- 133
- 80
Lots of ideological partisanship out there between these two issues and there seems to be a lot of muddying of the waters twixt the two. How do y'all think the hearing went yesterday with the peppering of questions / statements from the committee members who sometimes seemed to be more interested in scoring political points "on the record" knowing that they were going to get the "can't comment on that" answer....
- We've got the criminal investigation into gov. leaking of FISA generated, NSA 'unmasked' raw data. (automatic felony)
- Then we have the criminal investigation/probe ongoing into team Trump coordinating with the Russians.
Knowing that Comey can't offer incomplete evidence before fully collating it, what do his "no evidence to support tapping claims" mean to you? Do you take it as 'that is the final answer' Trump is not validated by the evidence? Do you take it as there is documented FISA / NSA illegality in 'unmasking' Trump's raw data and the investigation is only starting on this and can't be commented on in an open Congressional hearing?
Thoughts, comments and smart remarks....
- We've got the criminal investigation into gov. leaking of FISA generated, NSA 'unmasked' raw data. (automatic felony)
- Then we have the criminal investigation/probe ongoing into team Trump coordinating with the Russians.
Knowing that Comey can't offer incomplete evidence before fully collating it, what do his "no evidence to support tapping claims" mean to you? Do you take it as 'that is the final answer' Trump is not validated by the evidence? Do you take it as there is documented FISA / NSA illegality in 'unmasking' Trump's raw data and the investigation is only starting on this and can't be commented on in an open Congressional hearing?
Thoughts, comments and smart remarks....