- Apr 5, 2010
- 81,691
- 33,228
- 2,300
And why do you think I'm the one you need to convince?
You are the gold standard on this board for the rote SJW moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And why do you think I'm the one you need to convince?
that would depend on who the repubes are,, a lot of them are just dems in repube garb,,I think it's bipartisan because 4 members are appointed by Dems and 4 members are appointed by Republicans.
That seems pretty fucking bipartisan to me.
I think it's bipartisan because 4 members are appointed by Dems and 4 members are appointed by Republicans.
That seems pretty fucking bipartisan to me.
We have clearly reached the limits of your intellectual capacity.get back to me when youve read the constitution since it will answer all your questions,,
neither is ohio,,Colorado and Maine aren't taking away people's right to vote.
The independents that are chosen by the bipartisan members of the committee.And the other two? Ah yes, "independents"
youre the one that doesnt know what it says,,We have clearly reached the limits of your intellectual capacity.
It's okay. Not everyone is meant for critical independent thought.
I never claimed otherwise.neither is ohio,,
youre implying it,, thats why you keep moving the goal posts,,I never claimed otherwise.
Ohio is just making sure that some people's votes count more than others.
Convincing me is pointless. I have no legal authority.You are the gold standard on this board for the rote SJW moron.
Nothing has disenfranchised more than the DC elite with your pals at the DNC front and centerThese MAGA idiots are cheering for their own disenfranchisement. Incredible!
I implied no such thing. You are just not very smart.youre implying it,, thats why you keep moving the goal posts,,
It doesn't, and even if it did, it's not necessarily correct.youre the one that doesnt know what it says,,
so your projecting isnt going to work,,
doesnt what??It doesn't, and even if it did, it's not necessarily correct.
The fundamental question is how does one define "the public" of a Republic.
It doesn't answer the questions I asked. The questions you couldn't answer either.doesnt what??
could you be more specific??
you asked a lot of questions and all them them can be answered by reading the constitution,,It doesn't answer the questions I asked. The questions you couldn't answer either.
That's simply not true.you asked a lot of questions and all them them can be answered by reading the constitution,,
The independents that are chosen by the bipartisan members of the committee.
of course they are not created equal,, thats what the constitution is for dumbass,,That's simply not true.
Are we a republic if only white land-owning males are allowed to vote, meanwhile black people are kept as slaves?
The constitution doesn't answer this question. You avoid it like the plague.
The reason you avoid the question is because not all republics are created equal. Some are more democratic and some are less democratic. That's because a republic only means that the public are represented. The public can mean anything and the representation can be chosen in a number of ways.
The democratic part of the republic reflects how we vote for those representatives. If the ability to vote is unencumbered and extended to more people, we are more democratic. If the ability to vote is limited to a small number of people, then we are less democratic.
Don't bother replying. I know you have nothing intelligent to say on the matter. I've given you every opportunity to engage in rational discussion and you've rejected them.
I see you trying to pretend that Republicans aren't Republicans because it doesn't fit your narrative.you really don't see the circular logic at play here?