Cornyn outraged Obama may not bail out GOP if exchanges shut down

[Siete]

poor Republitards, soooooooooo clueless.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not gonna happen. There's zero chance any repeal gets through the senate, and Obama vetos it any case. There's no possiblity of changing obamacare in blue stated (for better or for worse). The party of no's best outcome now is Roberts again rewrites the law to say red state folks w/o state exchanges lose coverage, and the wingnuts in the House will not allow a legislative fix to the technical language. This will set up an election issue for 2016 in which the dem candidate runs in red states on restoring coverage to those whose coverage was taken away by the gop Court and House .... And (wait for it .... wait for it ....) the gop nominee is savaged by the primaries, in which the party of no voters demand he repudiate restoring coverage, while mainstream conservatives figure they cannot win w/o restoring coverage.

And Hillary dances a jig with her broom and black cat.

What shitflinger and Jake5000 are claiming is that once the court rules against the subsidies, the Republicans will rush to save Fascist Care.

An utterly absurd pipe dream on their part. These folks were elected to END Fascist Care and the $50,000 invoice on the shoulders of every American. Assuming the courts rule as expected, Fascist Care is done.

 

[bendog]

Not gonna happen. There's zero chance any repeal gets through the senate, and Obama vetos it any case. There's no possiblity of changing obamacare in blue stated (for better or for worse). The party of no's best outcome now is Roberts again rewrites the law to say red state folks w/o state exchanges lose coverage, and the wingnuts in the House will not allow a legislative fix to the technical language. This will set up an election issue for 2016 in which the dem candidate runs in red states on restoring coverage to those whose coverage was taken away by the gop Court and House .... And (wait for it .... wait for it ....) the gop nominee is savaged by the primaries, in which the party of no voters demand he repudiate restoring coverage, while mainstream conservatives figure they cannot win w/o restoring coverage.

And Hillary dances a jig with her broom and black cat.

What shitflinger and Jake5000 are claiming is that once the court rules against the subsidies, the Republicans will rush to save Fascist Care.

An utterly absurd pipe dream on their part. These folks were elected to END Fascist Care and the $50,000 invoice on the shoulders of every American. Assuming the courts rule as expected, Fascist Care is done.

Oh no, I'm actually thinking the Senate will pass a fix, but the House will not allow Boehner to bring it up for a vote without a battle for his leadership position, so the coverage will lapse in red states.

And, I'm thinking that's pretty much a sure way to lose some states like Ohio or Indiana to Hillary.

 

[BluesLegend]

Look there needs to be some consequences for all the liberal's Obamacare LIES.

 

[Siete]

idiots like uncensored are so busy chanting talking points they seem to forget their talking points have been debunked by factual evidence ... that's why idiots like uncensored are idiots.

 

[Dot Com]

The US cannot afford to have all citizens insured?

we can't afford not to.

 

[Siete]

Florida, Texas, North Carolina, Georgia, Michigan, and New Jersey are among those with the most to lose. Residents of blue states that are running their own markets would continue to receive benefits..

what part of that escapes RW idiots?

Red States suffer
Blue States still receive benefits


consequences for all the liberal's Obamacare LIES ... LMAO !!!!

 

[bripat9643]

GOP senator HHS chief s answers contemptuous - Yahoo News

Poll Most say restore health aid if court kills subsidies - Yahoo News
By golly, they worked long and hard at getting rid of these things, and they're not gonna take it lightly if Obama doesn't bow to public pressure to act to restore the law once they get rid of it.

I mean I'm not fan of obamacare, but helping people buy insurance used to be something gopers were for. LOL

Your title doesn't state the facts correctly (what a shock!). They are not angry that Obama is not going to bail out the exchanges. Obama has no authority to bail out the exchanges. They are angry because the head of HHS is apparently making no plans to handle things if the SC should rule against the Obama administration on the issue.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Pretty sure Gruber verified it was written this way on purpose and isnt an oversite.

 

[Uncensored2008]

we can't afford not to.

Which is why we were bankrupt from 1784 to 2014.

You Communists sure are smart....

 

[Dot Com]

we can't afford not to.

Which is why we were bankrupt from 1784 to 2014.

You Communists sure are smart....

you were saying hack boi? Gawd but you're a tool

Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies - CNN.com

 

[Uncensored2008]

you were saying hack boi? Gawd but you're a tool

Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies - CNN.com

So the answer is to increase medical costs some 70%

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/15/u...rdable-care-act-to-increase-in-2015.html?_r=0

You can't be as fucking stupid as you present yourself, and still draw breath.

"The house is on fire, quick get some more gasoline on it." - the dog cum solution....

 

[Dot Com]

you were saying hack boi? Gawd but you're a tool

Medical bills prompt more than 60 percent of U.S. bankruptcies - CNN.com

So the answer is to increase medical costs some 70%

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/15/u...rdable-care-act-to-increase-in-2015.html?_r=0

You can't be as fucking stupid as you present yourself, and still draw breath.

"The house is on fire, quick get some more gasoline on it." - the dog cum solution....

Good diversion I pointed out your massive FAIL and you

 

[Uncensored2008]

The dog cum solution to contain the fire.....