Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by deorro 1, Sep 4, 2019.
Contributing factors include:
When 'warning' signs are neglected and when the 'reality' of that foreknowledge sets in, what would any think if what occurred in that foreknowledge became due to the neglect of the 'forewarning' 'warning' signs?
It is not an understanding thing to do when time after time a certain 'warning' sign is neglected yet expecting an outcome not 'dangerous'. Unless of course, those 'foreknowledge' warning signs are proven to be 'false' by having a Greater and Larger Authority change the course of events all by Themselves; with or without the need of any 'getting around' them. etc...
In other words, They would NOT be in the parameters of 'cause and effect' but would be able to change all effects of all causes even of those which has proven a certain 'effect' from a certain 'cause'. They do not need to remain in the confines of human empiricism.
Nigga...you done smoked all yo shit.
I am not even sure where to start. Can we get some background?
Separate names with a comma.