Rshermr
VIP Member
Fraud, says oldstle. Who is a pitiful little man who is proud of having corrected text after leaving college. What a huge accomplishment. And, you took a whole econ class in college, and paid attention. Great, oldstyle, really, really impressive.Well, me boy, that is because you are stupid. You believe, because you are stupid. you see, stupid people can take information that YOU WANT to believe and make it true in their mind. So, you believe completely, think you are very smart, and believe anyone who does not believe as you do is the stupid one. I am sure you have been to tea party gatherings. Look around.
I have studied the malady for years. It is why all studies say the dumbest people are cons. It is because you get the information you need easily. And then you feel really, really good, being so smart.
One might wonder about your english skills because I said taught, and you took it to mean that I was currently a teacher. Any other stupid questions?
So, again, I will keep your criticism in mind, dipshit. Because I have such respect for your opinion.
Oldtime, you remind me of a turd. You know, walk through a lawn and step on one, and it is hard to shake off.
You resort to insults because you can't validate your contentions. Why? Because you don't understand economics nor do you have a clue about the economic history of this country. For you to come here and say that the Reagan tax cuts made the US economy go "in the shitter" is laughable. The Reagan tax cuts touched off the longest period of economic growth without a recession that this country has ever seen. How does THAT fit the description of putting the economy "in the shitter"?
How can someone who "supposedly" taught economics at the college level not know that? If you really were a teacher of economics then you would know what Reagan did (whether you agreed with his policies or not...) but you are so totally off base with your descriptions of what Reagan did and when he did it that I can only assume that you gleaned all of your information from some progressive site.
You're a fraud, Rshermr...you're one of those pitiful little people who gets on the internet and tries to pass themselves off as something they're not.
So, you somehow think that your criticism of me is of any import?? You are a fool if you do, as you are just a simple little person.
So, relative to reagan:
Working as a copy editor was my first job after finishing college. You must have been a very impressive student to find such a great job.It was an interesting (such a simple job could only be interesting to someone stupid, which helps prove my hypotheses about you) slightly boring job that I held for a year. I don't count it as a "huge accomplishment" but I do count it as a reference when someone like you accuses me of not having a grasp of the English language(yet you did not know that taught was past tense, did you now oldstyle.). And......
In college I took Macro Economics and Micro Economics...and YES, I did pay attention. Great, oldstyle, then maybe you can finaly answer why reagan increased taxes 11 times and increased the national debt to 3 times its size when he came into power, and increased spending and the size of the gov greatly. I asked you several times now, and if you were paying attention in your econ classes, as you say, you should have an answer. I can't wait to see your profound reasoning. I learned about John Maynard Keynes and his economic principles. My question for you is...what were you doing when you SHOULD have been paying attention? I'm assuming if you were allowed to instruct students at the college level that you were well versed in economics? Took many upper level classes and excelled? Yet you admit that you aren't an expert when it comes to the subject. What I said was that I do not claim to be an expert on anything. By the way, the last time I studied Keynes w......as over 40 years ago. And, yes indeed, compared to you I probably am an expert on Keynes. So...... The truth is...you've demonstrated an incredible ignorance of Keynesian economics and economic history in general. How you could have taught economics and be THAT ignorant is a wonder!!! So, a guy who took a couple econ classes is telling me that I do not know about keynsian econ. Again, your opinion has no worth, oldstyle. What seat of higher learning allowed "you" to teach paying students? They should be sued in court for "failure to deliver". So, dipshit, tell me where you are correct and I am wrong about Keynsian economics. I am sure it will be interesting. And the rest of your question is simple to answer, but I have not yet heard where the great economic expert oldstyle took his econ classes.
You are, very very obviously a con tool. Been educated yet by aei? Been talking to a local tea party guy who was. He sounds a lot like you.
Last edited: