Conservatve Marquette Professor Fights Suspension

[BS Filter]

This is why conservatives are confronting the education system. Once again, my point that the left demands submission, not equal rights. What do you think?
'This Is Stalinist Stuff': Conservative Marquette Professor Fights Suspension

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

The Marxists are deeply entrenched in academia. They can start with the very flawed educational loan system. Why? Because the government gives full backing to student loans. The schools never lose their money no matter what price point they set tuition at. It's a scam.

 

[JakeStarkey]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

 

[BS Filter]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

That's a bogus charge. If anyone threatens the graduate assistant, then they are responsible for their own actions. That's not going to fly in a court of law. It may work in a closed environmental cult like the university.

 

[westwall]

This is why conservatives are confronting the education system. Once again, my point that the left demands submission, not equal rights. What do you think?
'This Is Stalinist Stuff': Conservative Marquette Professor Fights Suspension

That has always been factual. Good for the Prof for fighting back, and more need to do this.

 

[JakeStarkey]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

That's a bogus charge. If anyone threatens the graduate assistant, then they are responsible for their own actions. That's not going to fly in a court of law. It may work in a closed environmental cult like the university.

If it is university rule and reg, yes, it will stand up in court.

 

[miketx]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

That's a bogus charge. If anyone threatens the graduate assistant, then they are responsible for their own actions. That's not going to fly in a court of law. It may work in a closed environmental cult like the university.

If it is university rule and reg, yes, it will stand up in court.

When it doesn't will you admit you are wrong?

 

[BS Filter]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

That's a bogus charge. If anyone threatens the graduate assistant, then they are responsible for their own actions. That's not going to fly in a court of law. It may work in a closed environmental cult like the university.

If it is university rule and reg, yes, it will stand up in court.

Not if the university rule is against free speech, which it is. People are entitled to their opinion on same-sex marriage. We're not all sheep that bow and follow to every agenda that the left bows to.

 

[JakeStarkey]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

That's a bogus charge. If anyone threatens the graduate assistant, then they are responsible for their own actions. That's not going to fly in a court of law. It may work in a closed environmental cult like the university.

If it is university rule and reg, yes, it will stand up in court.

Not if the university rule is against free speech, which it is. People are entitled to their opinion on same-sex marriage. We're not all sheep that bow and follow to every agenda that the left bows to.

You do not understand the law then. You have no 1stA in the work place. He placed her name in the open in his blog putting her at rick from others. We all have a right to a safe work place. If you are for or against same sex marriage has nothing to do with your work place. If the prof had pulled that in our work place, he would have been terminated, and when he sued, we would have counter sued.

 

[BS Filter]

From the link, "The university says it has the legal right to suspend Dr. John McAdams because he opened the graduate assistant up to threats by disparaging her by name in a blog post."

That's a bogus charge. If anyone threatens the graduate assistant, then they are responsible for their own actions. That's not going to fly in a court of law. It may work in a closed environmental cult like the university.

If it is university rule and reg, yes, it will stand up in court.

Not if the university rule is against free speech, which it is. People are entitled to their opinion on same-sex marriage. We're not all sheep that bow and follow to every agenda that the left bows to.

You do not understand the law then. You have no 1stA in the work place. He placed her name in the open in his blog putting her at rick from others. We all have a right to a safe work place. If you are for or against same sex marriage has nothing to do with your work place. If the prof had pulled that in our work place, he would have been terminated, and when he sued, we would have counter sued.

This is a university, a place where ideas are supposed to be tolerated and exchanged. The idea that because he mentioned her name, which is public knowledge by the way, and that somehow that puts her in danger and is his fault is ludicrous. If anyone threatens her it is their responsibility. This is just intimidation to force the conservative professor to submit. Tell me, why isn't the professor allowed to speak his opinion on same-sex marriage?

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one is going to allow the far right or the far left determine the rules of engagement in the work place: just won't happen.

 

[BS Filter]

No one is going to allow the far right or the far left determine the rules of engagement in the work place: just won't happen.

Don't you believe a professor should be allowed to speak feely on a university campus?

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one is going to allow the far right or the far left determine the rules of engagement in the work place: just won't happen.

Don't you believe a professor should be allowed to speak feely on a university campus?

Not if he is attacking another person publicly in violation of workplace rules.

Once again and for the last time: there is no free speech in a work place.

 

[BS Filter]

No one is going to allow the far right or the far left determine the rules of engagement in the work place: just won't happen.

Don't you believe a professor should be allowed to speak feely on a university campus?

Not if he is attacking another person publicly in violation of workplace rules.

Once again and for the last time: there is no free speech in a work place.

Read the article again. She attacked the professor for his opinion. She suspended him for having an opinion she didn't like. You think that's fair?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Read the article again, BS Filter, because your take is an Alt Fact.

If either had done that in our work place, the person would have been fired.

And why is anyone crying about someone else's views, publicly, on marriage?

 

[westwall]

No one is going to allow the far right or the far left determine the rules of engagement in the work place: just won't happen.

The university's have ALREADY gone far left, so cleary you are wrong.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one is going to allow the far right or the far left determine the rules of engagement in the work place: just won't happen.

The university's have ALREADY gone far left, so cleary you are wrong.

That's your opinion, yes. I thought you believed the work place had the right to set the rules on behavior, including speech.

 

[BS Filter]

Read the article again, BS Filter, because your take is an Alt Fact.

If either had done that in our work place, the person would have been fired.

And why is anyone crying about someone else's views, publicly, on marriage?

No, YOU read it again. He never attacked her. He said he didn't go along with same-sex marriage and then she suspended him. Even an idiot can clearly see he is being punished for his opinion. I agree with you, why is anyone crying about someone's views on same-sex marriage? The only one crying is the person that suspended the professor. No one should be suspended from their position for believing marriage is a male and female.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Read the article again, BS Filter, because your take is an Alt Fact.

If either had done that in our work place, the person would have been fired.

And why is anyone crying about someone else's views, publicly, on marriage?

No, YOU read it again. He never attacked her. He said he didn't go along with same-sex marriage and then she suspended him. Even an idiot can clearly see he is being punished for his opinion. I agree with you, why is anyone crying about someone's views on same-sex marriage? The only one crying is the person that suspended the professor. No one should be suspended from their position for believing marriage is a male and female.

You do not understand that the public blog was not the way to go. He violated the rules and regs of the work place because he did attack her position. Go back and read the article again.

Do you understand that a work place has the right to define, alter, and otherwise manage communications that professionally affect it?

 

[BS Filter]

Read the article again, BS Filter, because your take is an Alt Fact.

If either had done that in our work place, the person would have been fired.

And why is anyone crying about someone else's views, publicly, on marriage?

No, YOU read it again. He never attacked her. He said he didn't go along with same-sex marriage and then she suspended him. Even an idiot can clearly see he is being punished for his opinion. I agree with you, why is anyone crying about someone's views on same-sex marriage? The only one crying is the person that suspended the professor. No one should be suspended from their position for believing marriage is a male and female.

You do not understand that the public blog was not the way to go. He violated the rules and regs of the work place because he did attack her position. Go back and read the article again.

Do you understand that a work place has the right to define, alter, and otherwise manage communications that professionally affect it?

What I understand is that he is a professor at a university, a place where free speech and exchange of ideas should take preeminence. Move along now.