Conservative Confederates in the south were Democrats but became Republicans

[Political Junky]

Exactly.
2 Democrats left the party right after the civil rights bill was passed.

historical pattern. Republicans are more in favor of the bill:

Civil Rights support by party

80% of Republicans in the House and Senate voted for the bill. Less than 70% of Democrats did.

Cute, peach -

However, this is how the vote went.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vote totals[edit]
Totals are in "Yea–Nay" format:

The original House version: 290–130 (69–31%).
Cloture in the Senate: 71–29 (71–29%).
The Senate version: 73–27 (73–27%).
The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289–126 (70–30%).
By party[edit]
The original House version:[19]

Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[20]

Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[19]

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[19]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
By party and region[edit]
Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)
The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)

So BY PARTY the Republicans voted for it OVERALL 80% to the Democrats 69%....Thank you for PROVING who was most in favor of the bill!

You neglected the North/South vote -
This says it all.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

 

[Vigilante]

Cute, peach -

However, this is how the vote went.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vote totals[edit]
Totals are in "Yea–Nay" format:

The original House version: 290–130 (69–31%).
Cloture in the Senate: 71–29 (71–29%).
The Senate version: 73–27 (73–27%).
The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289–126 (70–30%).
By party[edit]
The original House version:[19]

Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[20]

Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[19]

Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[19]

Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%)
Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%)
By party and region[edit]
Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)
The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)

So BY PARTY the Republicans voted for it OVERALL 80% to the Democrats 69%....Thank you for PROVING who was most in favor of the bill!

You neglected the North/South vote -
This says it all.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

You can play your semantics, and unimportant demographics, all you want, when push came to shove, it was 80% to 69%. End of discussion, as the VOTE was the only thing that mattered!

 

[Political Junky]

So BY PARTY the Republicans voted for it OVERALL 80% to the Democrats 69%....Thank you for PROVING who was most in favor of the bill!

You neglected the North/South vote -
This says it all.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

You can play your semantics, and unimportant demographics, all you want, when push came to shove, it was 80% to 69%. End of discussion, as the VOTE was the only thing that mattered!

The demographics is the point. Do you really not understand that?

 

[Vigilante]

You neglected the North/South vote -
This says it all.

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

You can play your semantics, and unimportant demographics, all you want, when push came to shove, it was 80% to 69%. End of discussion, as the VOTE was the only thing that mattered!

The demographics is the point. Do you really not understand that?

No, the OP doesn't say that, and I PROVED that only 46 TOTAL of ALL federal ,state and local Dems. changed from Dem. to Rep. over a 20 year period including the 1964 Civil Rights act. But, if you want to continue to look like a subversive crybaby, you may continue, as the VOTE is what it is with 80% of the Rep voting for it and only 69% of the Dems voting for it... even using YOUR stats! Thanks for playing!

 

[guno]

Conservative Confederates in the south were Democrats but became Republicans in the middle 1960's. Do Republicans on the USMB understand that?

Lincoln was not a confederate.

The KKK was started by confederate conservatives that were in the Democratic Party until blacks started joining. Then they fled the Democrats and became Republicans.

This is just the simple truth. How is it USMB Republicans don't understand this history?

Yes the southern crackers were Dixiecrats and thrown out of the democratic party and were refused seating at the democratic convention. Nixon siezed on this an brought forth the white the southern strategy employing a southern cracker name lee Attwater from SC to run the republican campaign,he was successful in recruiting the southern cracker base to the republican party

 

[Vigilante]

Conservative Confederates in the south were Democrats but became Republicans in the middle 1960's. Do Republicans on the USMB understand that?

Lincoln was not a confederate.

The KKK was started by confederate conservatives that were in the Democratic Party until blacks started joining. Then they fled the Democrats and became Republicans.

This is just the simple truth. How is it USMB Republicans don't understand this history?

Yes the southern crackers were Dixiecrats and thrown out of the democratic party and were refused seating at the democratic convention. Nixon siezed on this an brought forth the white the southern strategy employing a southern cracker name lee Attwater from SC to run the republican campaign,he was successful in recruiting the southern cracker base to the republican party

OMG! He actually did that... and how many Democrats changed to Republicans, out of how many total Democrats?....

 

[Political Junky]

Look at all the blue states in the South 1962, they're all red today.

United States House of Representatives elections, 1962 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[whitehall]

Conservative Confederates in the south were Democrats but became Republicans in the middle 1960's. Do Republicans on the USMB understand that?

Lincoln was not a confederate.

The KKK was started by confederate conservatives that were in the Democratic Party until blacks started joining. Then they fled the Democrats and became Republicans.

This is just the simple truth. How is it USMB Republicans don't understand this history?

Yes the southern crackers were Dixiecrats and thrown out of the democratic party and were refused seating at the democratic convention. Nixon siezed on this an brought forth the white the southern strategy employing a southern cracker name lee Attwater from SC to run the republican campaign,he was successful in recruiting the southern cracker base to the republican party

When were alleged "dixiecrats" thrown out of the democrat party and refused seating at the convention? The only democrat who was thrown out of the party was their former V.P. candidate Joe Lieberman was was too moderate for the party of hatred to tolerate.

 

[Vigilante]

Look at all the blue states in the South 1962, they're all red today.

United States House of Representatives elections, 1962 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Heaven forbid, things change!...and a cup of coffee was 10 cents!

Looks like we put this bullshit to rest.... 46 Dems. change to Reps. in 20 years..... But these assholes on the left will continue to bring this worthless fact back up...again, and again, and again!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why are we arguing this?

Of course the OP is true.

Who cares?

 

[Vigilante]

Why are we arguing this?

Of course the OP is true.

Who cares?

Apparently the subversive OP cared or he wouldn't have posted it, and been embarrassed by the facts that the small amount of changes meant nothing significant!

 

[Oldstyle]

Conservative Confederates in the south were Democrats but became Republicans in the middle 1960's. Do Republicans on the USMB understand that?

Lincoln was not a confederate.

The KKK was started by confederate conservatives that were in the Democratic Party until blacks started joining. Then they fled the Democrats and became Republicans.

This is just the simple truth. How is it USMB Republicans don't understand this history?

Lincoln was not a Confederate? OMG!!! What ground breaking information, Deanie!!!

Lincoln was a Republican and the first versions of the KKK were formed as an insurgency against the blacks that were freed by Lincoln and the Republicans that were in charge of Reconstruction. The KKK were Democrats who used the threat of violence to keep blacks from voting and to vote out Republicans.

THAT is the simple truth...I know it's hard for liberals to explain, but facts ARE facts!

 

[jillian]

Actually the South (unjustly) hated republican Lincoln so much that socialist bigoted racist democrats had an easy time well into the 1970's convincing low information victims of the education system to vote democrat. FDR appointed a former member of the KKK to the supreme court without much opposition from the democrat majority and justice Hugo Black wrote the bigoted anti-Christian version of the separation of Church and State that we live with today.

cool mentally ill musings....

 

[Vigilante]

Actually the South (unjustly) hated republican Lincoln so much that socialist bigoted racist democrats had an easy time well into the 1970's convincing low information victims of the education system to vote democrat. FDR appointed a former member of the KKK to the supreme court without much opposition from the democrat majority and justice Hugo Black wrote the bigoted anti-Christian version of the separation of Church and State that we live with today.

cool mentally ill musings....

Did you know Guano has a crush on you? Seems everything you post, he thanks you for..... even the above mentally ill musings.... You children should get a room, but use a condom, we don't need you 2 to propagate!

 

[guno]

Actually the South (unjustly) hated republican Lincoln so much that socialist bigoted racist democrats had an easy time well into the 1970's convincing low information victims of the education system to vote democrat. FDR appointed a former member of the KKK to the supreme court without much opposition from the democrat majority and justice Hugo Black wrote the bigoted anti-Christian version of the separation of Church and State that we live with today.

cool mentally ill musings....

And they are playing the poor white christian victim card trying to remove themselves from history, They are shitting bricks in addition to the bizarre-o idea that America should be a christian nation

 

[rdean]

Did you see that? Some idiot says only 46 racist Democrats became Republican in 20 years. At least he admits they are racist. And how many politicians switch parties over a normal 20 years period? 5? 6? Less?

Now retard, just how many subversives were there in that 20 year period,?One thousand?...TWO Thousand, MORE as to ALL idiots in the Democratic party in all 50 states over 20 years..... A mere drop in the bucket as far as assholes go! Even YOUR IQ is higher than 46, but I must admit, it was getting close!.... He said that all the Racist Democrats stayed racists... learn to read!

all the Racist Democrats stayed racists after leaving the Democratic Party and joining up with Republicans. Which is why the GOP is 90% white today.

 

[Political Junky]

Did you see that? Some idiot says only 46 racist Democrats became Republican in 20 years. At least he admits they are racist. And how many politicians switch parties over a normal 20 years period? 5? 6? Less?

Now retard, just how many subversives were there in that 20 year period,?One thousand?...TWO Thousand, MORE as to ALL idiots in the Democratic party in all 50 states over 20 years..... A mere drop in the bucket as far as assholes go! Even YOUR IQ is higher than 46, but I must admit, it was getting close!.... He said that all the Racist Democrats stayed racists... learn to read!

all the Racist Democrats stayed racists after leaving the Democratic Party and joining up with Republicans. Which is why the GOP is 90% white today.

Yep, same folks, same beliefs, different party.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why are we arguing this?

Of course the OP is true.

Who cares?

Apparently the subversive OP cared or he wouldn't have posted it, and been embarrassed by the facts that the small amount of changes meant nothing significant!

What matters is that women, Hispanics, and other minorities will have twice as money votes are white males in the next presidential election.

 

[Vigilante]

Did you see that? Some idiot says only 46 racist Democrats became Republican in 20 years. At least he admits they are racist. And how many politicians switch parties over a normal 20 years period? 5? 6? Less?

Now retard, just how many subversives were there in that 20 year period,?One thousand?...TWO Thousand, MORE as to ALL idiots in the Democratic party in all 50 states over 20 years..... A mere drop in the bucket as far as assholes go! Even YOUR IQ is higher than 46, but I must admit, it was getting close!.... He said that all the Racist Democrats stayed racists... learn to read!

all the Racist Democrats stayed racists after leaving the Democratic Party and joining up with Republicans. Which is why the GOP is 90% white today.

No, the flat out number of 46 that included Federal, State, and Local Democrats changed for several reasons, not just your supposed racism...taxes, spending, military cutbacks, and many more issues were on the block, that these men thought the Democrats were wrong on, and still are.... but nice try child....thinking things out might help you, but it's doubtfull!

 

[Vigilante]

Now retard, just how many subversives were there in that 20 year period,?One thousand?...TWO Thousand, MORE as to ALL idiots in the Democratic party in all 50 states over 20 years..... A mere drop in the bucket as far as assholes go! Even YOUR IQ is higher than 46, but I must admit, it was getting close!.... He said that all the Racist Democrats stayed racists... learn to read!

all the Racist Democrats stayed racists after leaving the Democratic Party and joining up with Republicans. Which is why the GOP is 90% white today.

Yep, same folks, same beliefs, different party.

Apparently, you drank from the same glass of Kool-Aid as demented DenoBoy has. They're primarily white because the Democrats have BOUGHT OFF most black politicians with MONEY, favors, choice assignments within the Democratic Congress, and have an excellent working relationship with an acknowledged news media which plays up to the public whatever will do the best for the subversives, and hurt the Republicans, publicity wise! Simple fact. Apparently you idiots don't think anyone knows these things, as it certainly isn't going to be publicized by the MSM, and honestly, the feckless Republican leadership, the longer one looks at it, one tends to believe that they are simply going along for the ride. They virtually NEVER dispute whatever the obomanation, Dirty Harry, or Piglosi states to the press. If Republicans can't get these co-conspirators out of control in the Rep. party, a THIRD PARTY must be formed. IMHO, of course. A Third party COULD control Congress if neither the Dems or Rep. have a majority, and need to cater to that third party for votes needed to pass legislation! 5 or so Senators and perhaps 60 Representatives would be all that is necessary.