Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
What do you thnk?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My dogma can whip your dogma.I think you can't teach old dogma new tricks.
"[L]ibertarianism is not and does not pretend to be a complete moral, or aesthetic theory; it is only a political theory, that is, the important subset. of moral theory that deals with the proper role of violence in social life. Political theory deals with what is proper or improper for government to do, and government is distinguished from every other group in society as being the institution of organized violence. Libertarianism holds that the only proper role of violence is to defend person and property against violence, that any use of violence that goes beyond such just defense is itself aggressive, unjust, and criminal. Libertarianism, therefore, is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion, should he free to do as he sees fit except invade the person or property of another. What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to libertarianism."Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
My dogma done died giving pup birth.My dogma can whip your dogma.I think you can't teach old dogma new tricks.
Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatism and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
You being a resident expert on bs, your expertise should be taken into considerationConservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatism and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
Well, unlike Liberalism, they don't totally consist of bullshit. Carry on.
My gawd, the Rockwell Dogma rears it's ugly head? LOL"[L]ibertarianism is not and does not pretend to be a complete moral, or aesthetic theory; it is only a political theory, that is, the important subset. of moral theory that deals with the proper role of violence in social life. Political theory deals with what is proper or improper for government to do, and government is distinguished from every other group in society as being the institution of organized violence. Libertarianism holds that the only proper role of violence is to defend person and property against violence, that any use of violence that goes beyond such just defense is itself aggressive, unjust, and criminal. Libertarianism, therefore, is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion, should he free to do as he sees fit except invade the person or property of another. What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to libertarianism."Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
Six Myths About Libertarianism 8211 LewRockwell.com
In other words, the foundation of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle. I suppose you can call that a dogma if you like.
Yet none of the resident Libertarians nor the resident clowns have bothered to ask just whom this "founding father of modern conservatism" and this "leading Libertarian intellectual" are? Hmm...par for teh course.Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
So you've got nothing, in other words.My gawd, the Rockwell Dogma rears it's ugly head? LOL"[L]ibertarianism is not and does not pretend to be a complete moral, or aesthetic theory; it is only a political theory, that is, the important subset. of moral theory that deals with the proper role of violence in social life. Political theory deals with what is proper or improper for government to do, and government is distinguished from every other group in society as being the institution of organized violence. Libertarianism holds that the only proper role of violence is to defend person and property against violence, that any use of violence that goes beyond such just defense is itself aggressive, unjust, and criminal. Libertarianism, therefore, is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion, should he free to do as he sees fit except invade the person or property of another. What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to libertarianism."Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
Six Myths About Libertarianism 8211 LewRockwell.com
In other words, the foundation of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle. I suppose you can call that a dogma if you like.
The 'non-aggression' - ahem -- principle is nothing but bs warmed over and served up as something new. Going back into the history of Rockwell and the influences on him and that site will tell an interesting story. Trace it back.
"[L]ibertarianism is not and does not pretend to be a complete moral, or aesthetic theory; it is only a political theory, that is, the important subset. of moral theory that deals with the proper role of violence in social life. Political theory deals with what is proper or improper for government to do, and government is distinguished from every other group in society as being the institution of organized violence. Libertarianism holds that the only proper role of violence is to defend person and property against violence, that any use of violence that goes beyond such just defense is itself aggressive, unjust, and criminal. Libertarianism, therefore, is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion, should he free to do as he sees fit except invade the person or property of another. What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to libertarianism."Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
Six Myths About Libertarianism 8211 LewRockwell.com
In other words, the foundation of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle. I suppose you can call that a dogma if you like.
My gawd, the Rockwell Dogma rears it's ugly head? LOL"[L]ibertarianism is not and does not pretend to be a complete moral, or aesthetic theory; it is only a political theory, that is, the important subset. of moral theory that deals with the proper role of violence in social life. Political theory deals with what is proper or improper for government to do, and government is distinguished from every other group in society as being the institution of organized violence. Libertarianism holds that the only proper role of violence is to defend person and property against violence, that any use of violence that goes beyond such just defense is itself aggressive, unjust, and criminal. Libertarianism, therefore, is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion, should he free to do as he sees fit except invade the person or property of another. What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to libertarianism."Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
Six Myths About Libertarianism 8211 LewRockwell.com
In other words, the foundation of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle. I suppose you can call that a dogma if you like.
The 'non-aggression' - ahem -- principle is nothing but bs warmed over and served up as something new. Going back into the history of Rockwell and the influences on him and that site will tell an interesting story. Trace it back.
"[L]ibertarianism is not and does not pretend to be a complete moral, or aesthetic theory; it is only a political theory, that is, the important subset. of moral theory that deals with the proper role of violence in social life. Political theory deals with what is proper or improper for government to do, and government is distinguished from every other group in society as being the institution of organized violence. Libertarianism holds that the only proper role of violence is to defend person and property against violence, that any use of violence that goes beyond such just defense is itself aggressive, unjust, and criminal. Libertarianism, therefore, is a theory which states that everyone should be free of violent invasion, should he free to do as he sees fit except invade the person or property of another. What a person does with his or her life is vital and important, but is simply irrelevant to libertarianism."Conservatism and Libertarianism both have no Dogma. It's true because both a founding father of modern conservatim and a leading Libertarian intellectual (oxymoron?) have claimed this to be true.
What do you thnk?
Six Myths About Libertarianism 8211 LewRockwell.com
In other words, the foundation of libertarianism is the non-aggression principle. I suppose you can call that a dogma if you like.
And liberals totally support that premise. But it is the laissez-faire side of libertarians that is the problem.
The selfish spirit of commerce knows no country, and feels no passion or principle but that of gain. Thomas Jefferson - Letter to Larkin Smith (1809).