Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nice OP man.. Give me the IPCC CONSENSUS forecast for the 2056 temperature anomaly.. When 97% of all those folks you listed agree within 0.1degC --- THEN you have a real consensus. Right now all you got is a bunch of pointers and pretenders with a political mission...
97% of them are infinitely closer to the IPCC position than they are to ANYTHING like yours.
And once again, who cares. The only people who care about your "97% (what's the matter, didn't want to sound too much like Zimbabwe so opted away from 100%) are the chuckleheads benefitting from it.
Look at any AGW story on Yahoo and see how 97% of the comments are anti consensus. It has become so bad that more than a few of the websites will no longer allow comments. Nice to know you support PRAVDA, nothing like pure propaganda to get your point across......or expose it for the laughable fraud it is.
Big deal. Opinions are like assholes.....everybody's got one.
Yes, big deal. When you have that much of the scientific community agreeing on a subject, the few dissidents are usually complete cranks. In this case, cranks supported by very rich corperations.
Nope, those are a majority of climatologists whose wealth and prestige are tied up in the fraud. The majority of scientists now know they are full of crap. And look at all those big oil companies invested in "green" energy. Hmmmm, I wonder why you guys never mention them???
Yes, big deal. When you have that much of the scientific community agreeing on a subject, the few dissidents are usually complete cranks. In this case, cranks supported by very rich corperations.
Nope, those are a majority of climatologists whose wealth and prestige are tied up in the fraud. The majority of scientists now know they are full of crap. And look at all those big oil companies invested in "green" energy. Hmmmm, I wonder why you guys never mention them???
You know, here you are calling many of the most respected scientists in the world frauds. Were this a meeting of scientists, given the stench that the word fraud carries for real scientists, you would be called on to prove your contention, or be called out for a fraud yourself.
Nice OP man.. Give me the IPCC CONSENSUS forecast for the 2056 temperature anomaly.. When 97% of all those folks you listed agree within 0.1degC --- THEN you have a real consensus. Right now all you got is a bunch of pointers and pretenders with a political mission...
97% of them are infinitely closer to the IPCC position than they are to ANYTHING like yours.
Nope, those are a majority of climatologists whose wealth and prestige are tied up in the fraud. The majority of scientists now know they are full of crap. And look at all those big oil companies invested in "green" energy. Hmmmm, I wonder why you guys never mention them???
You know, here you are calling many of the most respected scientists in the world frauds. Were this a meeting of scientists, given the stench that the word fraud carries for real scientists, you would be called on to prove your contention, or be called out for a fraud yourself.
You'll get your wish soon enough. I am supporting Dr. Ball in Mann's suit against him. We are looking forward to the discovery which Mann has so far been unwilling to deliver..... I wonder why that might be
Nope, those are a majority of climatologists whose wealth and prestige are tied up in the fraud. The majority of scientists now know they are full of crap. And look at all those big oil companies invested in "green" energy. Hmmmm, I wonder why you guys never mention them???
You know, here you are calling many of the most respected scientists in the world frauds. Were this a meeting of scientists, given the stench that the word fraud carries for real scientists, you would be called on to prove your contention, or be called out for a fraud yourself.
You'll get your wish soon enough. I am supporting Dr. Ball in Mann's suit against him. We are looking forward to the discovery which Mann has so far been unwilling to deliver..... I wonder why that might be
The consensus is that the addition by man of GHGs to the atmosphere is warming the globe and changing the climate, to the detrimate of agriculture and infrastructure. Now there is much debate as to the rate, and timing of the effects. We are doing a grand experiment from which there is no turning back. And our grandchildren get to appreciate what the effects are going to be, and the timing of those effects.
You know, here you are calling many of the most respected scientists in the world frauds. Were this a meeting of scientists, given the stench that the word fraud carries for real scientists, you would be called on to prove your contention, or be called out for a fraud yourself.
You'll get your wish soon enough. I am supporting Dr. Ball in Mann's suit against him. We are looking forward to the discovery which Mann has so far been unwilling to deliver..... I wonder why that might be
Come on, asshole, just spit out what you are saying, rather than playing with innuendo and stupid threats. So what is this discovery? And how or who is he supposed to deliver this discovery to? Perhaps you have not figured that out yet?
Nice OP man.. Give me the IPCC CONSENSUS forecast for the 2056 temperature anomaly.. When 97% of all those folks you listed agree within 0.1degC --- THEN you have a real consensus. Right now all you got is a bunch of pointers and pretenders with a political mission...
97% of them are infinitely closer to the IPCC position than they are to ANYTHING like yours.
And once again, who cares.
The only people who care about your "97% (what's the matter, didn't want to sound too much like Zimbabwe so opted away from 100%) are the chuckleheads benefitting from it.
Look at any AGW story on Yahoo and see how 97% of the comments are anti consensus. It has become so bad that more than a few of the websites will no longer allow comments. Nice to know you support PRAVDA, nothing like pure propaganda to get your point across......or expose it for the laughable fraud it is.
And they have presented us with no measurable metric to gauge the success of their "predictions" which are so vague as to be meaningless. Kind of like Nostradamus.
And they have presented us with no measurable metric to gauge the success of their "predictions" which are so vague as to be meaningless. Kind of like Nostradamus.
Not to mention the fact that the CO2 just keeps rising but the warming just won't get with the program.
You'll get your wish soon enough. I am supporting Dr. Ball in Mann's suit against him. We are looking forward to the discovery which Mann has so far been unwilling to deliver..... I wonder why that might be
Come on, asshole, just spit out what you are saying, rather than playing with innuendo and stupid threats. So what is this discovery? And how or who is he supposed to deliver this discovery to? Perhaps you have not figured that out yet?
I suggest you check with your hero, unlike you I actually AM an expert witness. Which means you get bupkus from me till the judgment.
Im laughing at the irony.
"Consensus reality"
That is EXACTLY what the whole concept of global warming is.......the illussion of consensus reality.
To find out about "consensus reality" click on THIS >>> The individual vs. the illusion of consensus reality « Jon Rappoport's Blog
