bobcollum
Rookie
^ Hopefully joking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it were part of the film, would you attack it?
The protest is for redress of grievance with the central government, no?
i sure the hell hope the ussc overturns anything like this.....
they are protesting on public property....there should be no restrictions
Yea, you 'hope' that. I'll stick with 'hoping' it goes to the SC... they - at least in theory -will uphold the Constitution.
This has been the purpose of the WBC for a long time. It has been to give government the power to remove the rights of speech deemed offensive. This is a big step closer to keeping legitimate protests down because some people find them offensive. Oh wait, who am i kidding, the republicans find them offensive.
Before you guys go blaming obama, if this passed through congress it passed right by the republican controlled house. In other words the republicans who were elected to control the house a few years back just fucked all their constituents by removing their rights. What do we expect from the designers of the patriot act? Bush's legacy lives on and becomes stronger.
Sorry guys, but even if obama signs this into law he was the last person responsible for this, and given the supposed caring for people's rights the reps claim they have, it is them who gave it to obama to sign. Of course, if obama has the balls to not sign it and protect the freedom of speech then I guess that means obama is far more protective of our rights than any republican congressman. I have to wonder, if obama doesn't sign it and we get the typical Romney reaction that he is wrong, does that mean Romney hates our freedom of speech too?