Computer scientists urge Clinton campaign to challenge election results

[M14 Shooter]

[
Simple minded people don't like full investigations... At the moment there is doubt, getting rid of that doubt should be in everyone's interest...

I'll believe you want "full investigations" as soon as New Hampshire gets a recount.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It would have spared us the Dubya disaster and would have spared us the next 4 years and possibly the end of the republic

Still butt-hurt about the election, eh?

Trump won because the Democrats ran Hillary Clinton.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Can we all agree on one thing?
A recount can't hurt anything!

There are exactly two reasons for a recount of WI MI and PA and only WI MI and PA
- An attempt to overturn the election in Hillary's favor
- An attempt to discredit the legitimacy of Trumps election.
There is no 3rd option.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

[
Simple minded people don't like full investigations... At the moment there is doubt, getting rid of that doubt should be in everyone's interest...

I'll believe you want "full investigations" as soon as New Hampshire gets a recount.

And all votes cast by illegals in CA are thrown out.

 

[Richard-H]

Can we all agree on one thing?
A recount can't hurt anything!

There are exactly two reasons for a recount of WI MI and PA and only WI MI and PA
- An attempt to overturn the election in Hillary's favor
- An attempt to discredit the legitimacy of Trumps election.
There is no 3rd option.

According to the original analysis that started the recount, there is almost no chance that the election results will be overturned. If the analysis is correct and in all electoral districts that use computerized voting shorted Clinton by 7%, that will not be enough to change the election.

The fact is that it needs to be determined if these machines were hacked so that these types of machines will never be used in an election again. It would also need to be determined who is responsible for the hacking. Those people should go to prison.

The only way that these recount could change the election is if it were found that these machines were hacked and that Donald Trump was directly responsible. Is that why all you wingnuts are sweating under the collar?

Don't worry, it's doubtful that it will ever be determined who is responsible.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Can we all agree on one thing?
A recount can't hurt anything!

There are exactly two reasons for a recount of WI MI and PA and only WI MI and PA
- An attempt to overturn the election in Hillary's favor
- An attempt to discredit the legitimacy of Trumps election.
There is no 3rd option.

The fact is that it needs to be determined if these machines were hacked so that these types of machines will never be used in an election again. It would also need to be determined who is responsible for the hacking. Those people should go to prison.

As soon as they call for a recount of New Hampshire, I'll have reason to believe this.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Can we all agree on one thing?
A recount can't hurt anything!

There are exactly two reasons for a recount of WI MI and PA and only WI MI and PA
- An attempt to overturn the election in Hillary's favor
- An attempt to discredit the legitimacy of Trumps election.
There is no 3rd option.

According to the original analysis that started the recount, there is almost no chance that the election results will be overturned. If the analysis is correct and in all electoral districts that use computerized voting shorted Clinton by 7%, that will not be enough to change the election.

The fact is that it needs to be determined if these machines were hacked so that these types of machines will never be used in an election again. It would also need to be determined who is responsible for the hacking. Those people should go to prison.

The only way that these recount could change the election is if it were found that these machines were hacked and that Donald Trump was directly responsible. Is that why all you wingnuts are sweating under the collar?

Don't worry, it's doubtful that it will ever be determined who is responsible.

According to the guy that started all this nonsense--a Michigan university professor, if the machines were hacked, they only way they could have done it is by installing malware that is invisible at the start of the election, and self-destructs at the end of voting night. According to him, it would be impossible to find.

That being said, they want a recount anyway even if they can't find or prove any hacking.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That being said, they want a recount anyway even if they can't find or prove any hacking.

Never mind that MI just completed a recount, with a small net Trump gain.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That being said, they want a recount anyway even if they can't find or prove any hacking.

Never mind that MI just completed a recount, with a small net Trump gain.

I didn't hear of that. Have a link?

 

[M14 Shooter]

That being said, they want a recount anyway even if they can't find or prove any hacking.

Never mind that MI just completed a recount, with a small net Trump gain.

I didn't hear of that. Have a link?

Michigan completes recount; Trump still won by 10,704 votes