You can find numerous articles exploring this topic in detail:
All of the chatter about the constitutionality of Barack Taqiyyas executive orders and changing laws unilaterally is misdirection. In this case the law happens to be the Affordable Care Act. Not one talking head, or print journalist, that I am aware of has addressed the prime mover driving the crisis. DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO TELL LAW-ABIDING AMERICANS WHAT TO DO?
Socialists answer yes. They say the president is constitutionally empowered to do whatever it takes to achieve compliance with the law.
Naturally, Socialists would answer yes to the question. Their world falls apart when they cannot tell the public what to do. They began their long march toward dictating behavior with coerced charity funded by the tax on incomes. Unfortunately, most Americans never say that a tax on their labor is the same as the government telling them what to do. Openly telling Americans what to do is the end of their journey.
The rest of the federal government can stop the president in a split second. The truth is: The ruling class is manipulating media coverage on the issue of government authority so nothing is done about it. Reducing the power of the presidency will certainly reduce the authority of their entire federal government. Ruling elitists cannot have that. Thats why they will limit this constitutional crisis to the ACA.
NOTE: The NSA eavesdropping scandal does not involve the government telling Americans what to do; so Rand Pauls lawsuit is not a threat to Socialisms first rule of power: The people will do as they are told.
The content of an executive order matters not, nor does it matter if the president changes a law, or refuses to enforce a law. If the government telling law-abiding Americans what they must do is not stopped with the ACA it wont be long before Socialists legislate immigration and environmental laws worse than the ACA then force compliance just as they are doing with HillaryCare II. You must buy health insurance becomes you must house illegal immigrants in your home; you must buy clean-burning fuel for yourself and for your neighbors home, and so on.
If you think that is far-fetched remember what Communist regimes do in housing. Soviet Communists forced families to live together in two or three rooms. Right now insane environmental regulations is causing a drought in Southern California while Socialists blame it on global warming. This excerpt is from a 2009 article:
The drought is worse today than it was 2009 as Governor Shit-For-Brains Brown tells Californians to learn to live with bowl-floaters:
Finally, the compliance argument is the most ambitious political scam Socialists have attempted since the first amnesty for illegals back in 1986. Compliance opens the floodgate to everything Socialists/Communists dream about; hence, this threads title.
All of the chatter about the constitutionality of Barack Taqiyyas executive orders and changing laws unilaterally is misdirection. In this case the law happens to be the Affordable Care Act. Not one talking head, or print journalist, that I am aware of has addressed the prime mover driving the crisis. DOES THE GOVERNMENT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO TELL LAW-ABIDING AMERICANS WHAT TO DO?
Socialists answer yes. They say the president is constitutionally empowered to do whatever it takes to achieve compliance with the law.
Naturally, Socialists would answer yes to the question. Their world falls apart when they cannot tell the public what to do. They began their long march toward dictating behavior with coerced charity funded by the tax on incomes. Unfortunately, most Americans never say that a tax on their labor is the same as the government telling them what to do. Openly telling Americans what to do is the end of their journey.
The rest of the federal government can stop the president in a split second. The truth is: The ruling class is manipulating media coverage on the issue of government authority so nothing is done about it. Reducing the power of the presidency will certainly reduce the authority of their entire federal government. Ruling elitists cannot have that. Thats why they will limit this constitutional crisis to the ACA.
NOTE: The NSA eavesdropping scandal does not involve the government telling Americans what to do; so Rand Pauls lawsuit is not a threat to Socialisms first rule of power: The people will do as they are told.
The content of an executive order matters not, nor does it matter if the president changes a law, or refuses to enforce a law. If the government telling law-abiding Americans what they must do is not stopped with the ACA it wont be long before Socialists legislate immigration and environmental laws worse than the ACA then force compliance just as they are doing with HillaryCare II. You must buy health insurance becomes you must house illegal immigrants in your home; you must buy clean-burning fuel for yourself and for your neighbors home, and so on.
If you think that is far-fetched remember what Communist regimes do in housing. Soviet Communists forced families to live together in two or three rooms. Right now insane environmental regulations is causing a drought in Southern California while Socialists blame it on global warming. This excerpt is from a 2009 article:
The drought is worse today than it was 2009 as Governor Shit-For-Brains Brown tells Californians to learn to live with bowl-floaters:
Finally, the compliance argument is the most ambitious political scam Socialists have attempted since the first amnesty for illegals back in 1986. Compliance opens the floodgate to everything Socialists/Communists dream about; hence, this threads title.
