Republicans chide Democrats for using "Jihadists" instead of "Islamist Extremists," for describing the now famous related factions. Mostly, Al Qaeda and ISIS actually want to recruit affiliates in Moslem nations. Mostly, GOP wants to win elections. What people seem unable to notice is that tiny numbers of suicides create a brilliant recruiting photo op for the Jihadist brands. What people seem unable to notice is that the Republicans mainly want to blame Democratic Party shortcomings, for just about anything. Their use of photo ops is far less brilliant, far less focused, and increasingly far less even worth watching. They seem to need a more compelling source of imagery. That may have started when Lincoln killed off the 700,000 White People, with followers doing it for him(?). Moslems seem to have the problem!
Comparing Al Qaeda and ISIS: Different goals, different targets
There are 47 nations with majority Moslem populations. The GOP has no interest in them. The Jihadists have a great deal of interest in them. That interest seems to have a source in a time of tiny populations, from over a thousand years ago. What they want now can only make sense to a disaffected minority, among the Moslems. Dubai or Saudi Arabia, for example, do not seem all that disenchanted with material progress. So for recruiting, there are Jihadists willing to go into the West, and promptly die. A signal of anti-material progress may be said to be happening, with basis in the ancient appeals.
Coincidentally, the Republicans have been running debates showcasing--more personalities than a TV game show. Issues are less involved. There is nothing of much substance in the content, extolling mostly a self-described concept, "Gotcha!" Senator Rubio is even disconnected from the government he technically oversees. "We can't call Syria for background checks," he is on public record for noting. In government, probably Immigration would call CIA, Interpol, The English home office, the Russians, or anyone else to find the actual potential suicides. There are two factions engaged. They are Al Qaeda, and ISIL.
How many are there? Probably that is known, or able to become known. Israel famously has the ability to create area intelligence. Israel easily has in common with the Democrats, a commitment to Civil Liberties worldwide, and through the United Nations. There would easily be said a Jewish interest in common with Islam, protecting civil rights in the Moslem majority nations of the planet. The Democrats tend to be civil rights protective of minority rights. More likely that will become an issue in Moslem nations, with basis in the two little factions.
And so Senators Graham and Rubio and others GOP, call for military interventions instead. What makes better campaign aids for US political ascendency? Rambo photos with fireworks in the sky, "Eat at Trumps."
Rubio is actually on public record, with nearly that concept. That may be thought helpful for recruiting votes.
Maybe two whole photo ops would happen(?). Jihadists are on public record, with a similar concept: Creating devastation, using suicides. That may be thought to help create affiliate groups, in Moslem Nations. The many thousands give them a recruiting base.
In fact, there is nothing worldwide of any interest to billions, in either public relations campaigning.
On to substance, the world must go.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe call on Northeast Confederation, before atrocity, directed at Plymouth Rock!)
Comparing Al Qaeda and ISIS: Different goals, different targets
There are 47 nations with majority Moslem populations. The GOP has no interest in them. The Jihadists have a great deal of interest in them. That interest seems to have a source in a time of tiny populations, from over a thousand years ago. What they want now can only make sense to a disaffected minority, among the Moslems. Dubai or Saudi Arabia, for example, do not seem all that disenchanted with material progress. So for recruiting, there are Jihadists willing to go into the West, and promptly die. A signal of anti-material progress may be said to be happening, with basis in the ancient appeals.
Coincidentally, the Republicans have been running debates showcasing--more personalities than a TV game show. Issues are less involved. There is nothing of much substance in the content, extolling mostly a self-described concept, "Gotcha!" Senator Rubio is even disconnected from the government he technically oversees. "We can't call Syria for background checks," he is on public record for noting. In government, probably Immigration would call CIA, Interpol, The English home office, the Russians, or anyone else to find the actual potential suicides. There are two factions engaged. They are Al Qaeda, and ISIL.
How many are there? Probably that is known, or able to become known. Israel famously has the ability to create area intelligence. Israel easily has in common with the Democrats, a commitment to Civil Liberties worldwide, and through the United Nations. There would easily be said a Jewish interest in common with Islam, protecting civil rights in the Moslem majority nations of the planet. The Democrats tend to be civil rights protective of minority rights. More likely that will become an issue in Moslem nations, with basis in the two little factions.
And so Senators Graham and Rubio and others GOP, call for military interventions instead. What makes better campaign aids for US political ascendency? Rambo photos with fireworks in the sky, "Eat at Trumps."
Rubio is actually on public record, with nearly that concept. That may be thought helpful for recruiting votes.
Maybe two whole photo ops would happen(?). Jihadists are on public record, with a similar concept: Creating devastation, using suicides. That may be thought to help create affiliate groups, in Moslem Nations. The many thousands give them a recruiting base.
In fact, there is nothing worldwide of any interest to billions, in either public relations campaigning.
On to substance, the world must go.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Maybe call on Northeast Confederation, before atrocity, directed at Plymouth Rock!)
