&
☭proletarian☭
Guest
Fail.Stop being obtuse, one can show by currently accepted scientific method what the contents of your closet are (even at night), however the same cannot be said regarding the existence or non-existence of a "creator".So it requires FAITH to know there isn't a MONSTER in your closet at night not just COMMON SENSE!!!???
You cannot prove the absence of the monster. You can only point to a lack of evidence for an invisible undetectable supernatural monster in the closet that created the universe and forgive your sins.
That being said, logic lends more credence to the existence of a "creator" because after all the universe does exist and supposing it didn't come into existence by some form of an act of creation one is left with an assumption that it just came about spontaneously which is illogical.
Fail. You assume it came into existence. You must demonstrate that the universe came into existence (and no, BBT doesn't propose any such thing) before you can address how it came into being. Then you must demonstrate where your creator came from and that it exists at all. After all, M-Theory and others can easily explain the emergence of our universe, assuming they continue to stand up to scrutiny as they have.