commonly accepted narratives about foundation of civilization are wrong: groundbreaking research challenge traditional thinking about inequality roots

[basquebromance]

Did you know: Before the first civilizations, there was a "global village" where people thrived without social class barriers? This is the untold story of history *and* it may be worth revisiting:

 

[surada]

Did you know: Before the first civilizations, there was a "global village" where people thrived without social class barriers? This is the untold story of history *and* it may be worth revisiting:

This is good.

 

[surada]

Inequality is the driving force in civilization.

 

[AMart]

Did you know: Before the first civilizations, there was a "global village" where people thrived without social class barriers? This is the untold story of history *and* it may be worth revisiting:

That happened "after" civilizations were formed. And various types of social classes would have been formed.

 

[lg325]

I understand his view of that time. I can't entirely agree with it. Whoever was the strongest and most intelligent became the upper social class in hunter-gather and agrarian groups. For those at that time to achieve and progress there had to be a leadership class. Or am I not understanding him correctly?