Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

[rdean]

Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

That's it. A "simple" question. Why all the voter suppression when you could win America over, and very easily, with "good policy".

And please:

No "there is no voter suppression". We all know there is.

No "but we have good policy". We all know you don't. You can't even describe it.

Even most Republicans believe rebuilding America's infrastructure is "good policy".

No true Christian believes in "Every man for himself". It's against everything that religion stands for.

It's time to come up with a "new argument". So, once again:

Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

 

[JimH52]

Unfortunately, the GOP is mezmiried by their number one stated goal of getting Obama out of the White House. You need to throw all ration and logical thoughts out the window. They are pulling out all stops in their obsession to get the black man out of DC.

But the number one "not so secret" weapong for the Dems is now the frontrunner for the GOP. Newt will eventually melt like a snowball in Hell in his quest for the WH. Let's hope that he is the nominee when that happens, unlike Bachmann, Perry, and Cain who showed their true colors a tad too early..

 

[Stephanie]

Yawn

 

[AmericanFirst]

Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

That's it. A "simple" question. Why all the voter suppression when you could win America over, and very easily, with "good policy".

And please:

No "there is no voter suppression". We all know there is.

No "but we have good policy". We all know you don't. You can't even describe it.

Even most Republicans believe rebuilding America's infrastructure is "good policy".

No true Christian believes in "Every man for himself". It's against everything that religion stands for.

It's time to come up with a "new argument". So, once again:

Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

Dimwits like to holler VOTER SUPPRESSION when they try to let illegal immigrants and illegal voting practices go on. Let me put it this way; ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS HAVE NO RIGHT TO VOTE. VOTERS CAN ONLY VOTE ONCE. IF YOU ARE NOT A REGISTERED VOTER FOR A CERTAIN STATE YOU CAN NOT VOTE. I know, dimwits hate the idea of LEGAL voting practices, but too bad. They can cry all they want.

 

[Truthmatters]

But the people who fill their heads with lies want this policy.

Its why they have to fill peoples heads with lies.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Unfortunately, the GOP is mezmiried by their number one stated goal of getting Obama out of the White House. You need to throw all ration and logical thoughts out the window. They are pulling out all stops in their obsession to get the black man out of DC.

But the number one "not so secret" weapong for the Dems is now the frontrunner for the GOP. Newt will eventually melt like a snowball in Hell in his quest for the WH. Let's hope that he is the nominee when that happens, unlike Bachmann, Perry, and Cain who showed their true colors a tad too early..

No, we obsessed with getting the socialist out of the white house. Idiots like you are the racists.

 

[Stephanie]

And whatever the hell infrastructure has to do with voting. you got me

couldn't make heads or tails out of this rant. but nothing new

 

[AmericanFirst]

But the people who fill their heads with lies want this policy.

Its why they have to fill peoples heads with lies.

Dimwits are the best at filling people's heads with lies and then blame someone else for lying.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

That's it. A "simple" question. Why all the voter suppression when you could win America over, and very easily, with "good policy".

And please:

No "there is no voter suppression". We all know there is.

No "but we have good policy". We all know you don't. You can't even describe it.

Even most Republicans believe rebuilding America's infrastructure is "good policy".

No true Christian believes in "Every man for himself". It's against everything that religion stands for.

It's time to come up with a "new argument". So, once again:

Come on GOP, instead of "voter suppression", how about "good policy"?

Good policy would be for you to stop your psychotic ramblings.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Unfortunately, the GOP is mezmiried by their number one stated goal of getting Obama out of the White House. You need to throw all ration and logical thoughts out the window. They are pulling out all stops in their obsession to get the black man out of DC.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgvBdlD7xUk]Rachel Maddow: Fox News To White People: Be Very Afraid! Black People Are Coming To Get You! Part 1 - YouTube[/ame]​

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Must really suck to not have anything positive to post about Obama.

Poor deanie.......schmuck

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Obamas policy.......

Vote black
Vote often
Vote for the liar n chief

 

[Stephanie]

Some people really need a life.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Obama sucks yo

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Worst president in modern history.

Jimmy Carters twin.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Typical Obama supporter. Cry about made up bullshit because your too much of a pussy to face the music.

 

[Oldstyle]

Asking people to provide the same amount of ID in order to vote that they'd need to cash a freaking check at the bank isn't voter suppression and your continued attempts to make it so are just as amusing now as they were two years ago.

 

[Stephanie]

Asking people to provide the same amount of ID in order to vote that they'd need to cash a freaking check at the bank isn't voter suppression and your continued attempts to make it so are just as amusing now as they were two years ago.

Hey, his elected masters say it's so, so it must be.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Dean is pissed because Obama rejected his advances. Deans got no game.

 

[Truthmatters]

Yes it is.

there is no need for the IDs and that was proven by a five year BUSH study.

There is not fraud of this type that is capable of changing even local election results.

THERE ARE legal American voters who would be forced out of their right to vote by these laws.


Why is the right for WASTING TAX DOLLARS to the tune of MILLIONS to effect nothing but keeping legal voters from voting?