Bill Warners piece is a must read:
First and foremost, no American who enjoys the freedoms guaranteed in the US Constitution can coexist with Islam. The two are eternally incompatible. Islam is a theocracy. Every Islamic theocracy refutes the Constitution especially the First Amendment. Americans should judge Islam on those grounds not buy into the crap on a bumper sticker.
Americas history shows that peaceful coexistence among religions is only possible when the First Amendment is respected and enforced. Somebody should be teaching American Muslims to coexist with the First Amendment. Ill start the ball rolling. Folks communicating on the new media should refer to Islam as a political movement as often as they call Islam a religion. The old media wont do it.
The danger in coexisting peacefully lies in the B.S. the old media promotes about coexisting with people who have sworn to kill us. Since the end of WWII those same people have been preaching coexisting with communism. The jury is still out on Muslims, but there is no doubt Democrats will never coexist with the Constitution.
Do you see a pattern emerging? Liberals are all for coexisting with two brutal, totalitarian, religions. Conversely, Hussein complained about Christians hanging on to their God and their guns. Notice that he has no problem with arming his personal goon squad (the Ready Reserve Corps), or arming the Muslim Brotherhood and drug cartels.
Now, lets take a trip down memory lane. Go back to WWI and see how Turkish Muslims coexisted with Armenian Christians:
There is so much in Raymond Ibrahims piece worth quoting, Ive decided to post a few sentences in the hope they will be enough to prompt a desire to connect them to the premise:
One bit of psycho-babble speculation. Women are brutalized by Muslim men. Some Muslim clerics endorse the practice of forcibly circumcising young girls, then they justify savagery with religious double-talk designed to inflame the meanest level of twisted morality. The result is that a Muslims manhood is forever tied to female virginity.
NOTE: I have to wonder what Al Gores hangup is. Hes not worried about virginity or is he:
In any event, the burka is the joke on male Muslims. Heres some of the tongue in cheek stuff Ive posted over the years.
All of the recent talk about Muslim women being forced to wear burkas in repressive Islamic countries in order to keep them modest, pure, and faithful reminded me of something I read some decades ago. I dont recall the name of the authoress, or where it was published, but she said that Muslim women love their burkas because it allowed them to make cuckolds of their husbands with impunity. The burka is the perfect disguise! In fact, a burka is a better disguise than a ski mask:
Clearly, an unfaithful wife can come and go with complete anonymity when shes wearing a burka. Just imagine how happy a married woman is as she tap dances out of a studs pad after consummating a satisfying double-nooner knowing she cant be identified.
Thinking a burka guarantees fidelity tells me that Muslim extremists are really a collection of morons, or else they dont mind their womenfolk playing Lets hide the pickle at the drop of a burka just so long as the neighbors dont find out about it.
Westerners are convinced the burka enslaves women. Maybe it does, but there are more subtle considerations at play here.
For one thing, shedding the burka will play hell with the imaginations of Muslim men who become aroused by a sack of rags that might be concealing a woman. I know that sounds far-fetched until you put it in perspective this way: An amorously inclined Western woman calls upon Victorias Secret if she wants to arouse her man, but when a Muslim woman tells her man shes going to slip into something comfortable she dives under a burka. Conclusion: Burkas must be an arousal tool in the Muslim world.
And lets not forget a Muslim Don Juan laying his best Saturday night moves on a burka then coming up with a handful of testicles when its time to do some business. Maybe thats why Muslim men are so damned angry.
On the downside, Democrats will probably come up with a program to compensate cross-dressers in Muslim countries if the burka is done away with? New wardrobes are far from cheap.
Shedding the burkas also poses a great danger. Muslim clerics from the old school wont be able to handle the overload when the streets are full of attractive women wearing miniskirts. The anti-burka crowd better go easy because Muslim fanatics are still living in the sixteenth century anyway.
Finally, I sense a perverse connection between the burka and liberalisms aversion to physical beauty. Muslim bow-wows love their burkas just as Socialist bow-wows can be as dumb as dishwater, but love occupying the highest positions in government and business anyway. The choice for Muslim men is simple: Hide all of the beautiful women under the burka, or turn the dogs loose in the Islamic world.
There is an enormous irony contained in the Boston Marathon bombing. When the jihadi Tsarnaev brothers carjacked a Mercedes, it had a Coexist bumper sticker.
The Coexist bumper sticker is the religious symbol of the multicultural crowd -- you know -- all religions are the same. Well, the leading symbol of those who want to Coexist is the star and crescent Islam. And exactly how well has Islam coexisted with all the others? What kind of neighbor has Islam been over history?
April 24, 2013
Islam Coexists?
By Bill Warner
Articles: Islam Coexists?
First and foremost, no American who enjoys the freedoms guaranteed in the US Constitution can coexist with Islam. The two are eternally incompatible. Islam is a theocracy. Every Islamic theocracy refutes the Constitution especially the First Amendment. Americans should judge Islam on those grounds not buy into the crap on a bumper sticker.
Americas history shows that peaceful coexistence among religions is only possible when the First Amendment is respected and enforced. Somebody should be teaching American Muslims to coexist with the First Amendment. Ill start the ball rolling. Folks communicating on the new media should refer to Islam as a political movement as often as they call Islam a religion. The old media wont do it.
The danger in coexisting peacefully lies in the B.S. the old media promotes about coexisting with people who have sworn to kill us. Since the end of WWII those same people have been preaching coexisting with communism. The jury is still out on Muslims, but there is no doubt Democrats will never coexist with the Constitution.
Do you see a pattern emerging? Liberals are all for coexisting with two brutal, totalitarian, religions. Conversely, Hussein complained about Christians hanging on to their God and their guns. Notice that he has no problem with arming his personal goon squad (the Ready Reserve Corps), or arming the Muslim Brotherhood and drug cartels.
Now, lets take a trip down memory lane. Go back to WWI and see how Turkish Muslims coexisted with Armenian Christians:
Today, April 24, marks the Great Crime, that is, the Armenian genocide that took place under Turkeys Islamic Ottoman Empire, during and after WWI. Out of an approximate population of two million, some 1.5 million Armenians died. If early 20th century Turkey had the apparatuses and technology to execute in masssuch as 1940s Germanys gas chambersthe entire Armenian population may well have been decimated.
There is so much in Raymond Ibrahims piece worth quoting, Ive decided to post a few sentences in the hope they will be enough to prompt a desire to connect them to the premise:
. . . Despite the vast amount of evidence that points to the historical reality of the Armenian Genocide, eyewitness accounts, official archives, photographic evidence, the reports of diplomats, and the testimony of survivors, denial of the Armenian Genocide by successive regimes in Turkey has gone on from 1915 to the present.
XXXXX
In the city of Malatia, she saw 16 Christian girls crucified: Each girl had been nailed alive upon her cross, spikes through her feet and hands, she wrote.
XXXXX
Even Adolf Hitler pointed out that Turkey is taking advantage of the war in order to thoroughly liquidate its internal foes, i.e., the indigenous Christians, without being thereby disturbed by foreign intervention.
XXXXX
Now that war has come to Syriawith the U.S. supporting the jihadis and terroriststhe Christians there are on the run for their lives.
XXXXX
If Christians are thus being singled out todayin our modern, globalized, humanitarian ageare we to suppose that they werent singled out a century ago by Turks?
XXXXX
As one Armenian studies professor asks, If it [the Armenian Genocide] was a feud between Turks and Armenians, what explains the genocide carried out by Turkey against the Christian Assyrians at the same time?
XXXXX
Meanwhile, the modern Islamic worlds response to the persecution of Christians is identical to Turkeys response to the Armenian genocide: Denial.
XXXXX
In 1915, Adolf Hitler rationalized his genocidal plans, which he implemented some three decades later, rhetorically asked: Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?
The Forgotten Genocide and why it matters today
By: Raymond Ibrahim
4/24/2013 10:06 AM
The Forgotten Genocide -- and why it matters
One bit of psycho-babble speculation. Women are brutalized by Muslim men. Some Muslim clerics endorse the practice of forcibly circumcising young girls, then they justify savagery with religious double-talk designed to inflame the meanest level of twisted morality. The result is that a Muslims manhood is forever tied to female virginity.
NOTE: I have to wonder what Al Gores hangup is. Hes not worried about virginity or is he:
AL GORE: STERILIZE WOMEN UNDER 25
By Frank Lake on June 25, 2011
AL GORE: STERILIZE WOMEN UNDER 25 | Weekly World News
In any event, the burka is the joke on male Muslims. Heres some of the tongue in cheek stuff Ive posted over the years.
All of the recent talk about Muslim women being forced to wear burkas in repressive Islamic countries in order to keep them modest, pure, and faithful reminded me of something I read some decades ago. I dont recall the name of the authoress, or where it was published, but she said that Muslim women love their burkas because it allowed them to make cuckolds of their husbands with impunity. The burka is the perfect disguise! In fact, a burka is a better disguise than a ski mask:
Hunt for the 'Burka Bandit': Man armed with knife and umbrella dressed as Muslim woman to rob travel agents
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 7:57 AM on 28th June 2011
Hunt for the burka raider: Man dressed as Muslim woman caught on CCTV robbing travel agencies | Mail Online
Clearly, an unfaithful wife can come and go with complete anonymity when shes wearing a burka. Just imagine how happy a married woman is as she tap dances out of a studs pad after consummating a satisfying double-nooner knowing she cant be identified.
Thinking a burka guarantees fidelity tells me that Muslim extremists are really a collection of morons, or else they dont mind their womenfolk playing Lets hide the pickle at the drop of a burka just so long as the neighbors dont find out about it.
Westerners are convinced the burka enslaves women. Maybe it does, but there are more subtle considerations at play here.
For one thing, shedding the burka will play hell with the imaginations of Muslim men who become aroused by a sack of rags that might be concealing a woman. I know that sounds far-fetched until you put it in perspective this way: An amorously inclined Western woman calls upon Victorias Secret if she wants to arouse her man, but when a Muslim woman tells her man shes going to slip into something comfortable she dives under a burka. Conclusion: Burkas must be an arousal tool in the Muslim world.
And lets not forget a Muslim Don Juan laying his best Saturday night moves on a burka then coming up with a handful of testicles when its time to do some business. Maybe thats why Muslim men are so damned angry.
On the downside, Democrats will probably come up with a program to compensate cross-dressers in Muslim countries if the burka is done away with? New wardrobes are far from cheap.
Shedding the burkas also poses a great danger. Muslim clerics from the old school wont be able to handle the overload when the streets are full of attractive women wearing miniskirts. The anti-burka crowd better go easy because Muslim fanatics are still living in the sixteenth century anyway.
Finally, I sense a perverse connection between the burka and liberalisms aversion to physical beauty. Muslim bow-wows love their burkas just as Socialist bow-wows can be as dumb as dishwater, but love occupying the highest positions in government and business anyway. The choice for Muslim men is simple: Hide all of the beautiful women under the burka, or turn the dogs loose in the Islamic world.