jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,583
- 30,059
- 2,180
I don't believe in anything not documented as fact following a test. and to date you have presented no test. Dude,again, just post up the experiment that shows an ice cube makes a hot ember hotter and I'll shut up.so curious, do you have an experiment that validates cold photons flowing to warm? you know, where something cold makes something warm warmer? Got that one?The irony of SSDD's myopia is that he relies on his misinterpretation of the second law as defined by Georgia State U:
That very same reference states an equivalent definition further down the page that has nothing to do with his misunderstanding about thermal photons flowing from cold to warm objects.The source is the physics department of Georgia State University. You will have to excuse me but I will accept their statement of the 2nd law over any amount of wiki.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is not possible for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.
Second Law of Thermodynamics: In any cyclic process the entropy will either increase or remain the same.
In short, he claims to accept Georgia State, but that reference also denies his claim about energy flow.
what a fucking idiot you are.
no one here has ever claimed that the photons from a cool object will warm a warmer object if that is the only source of energy input.no one here has ever claimed that the photons from a cool object will warm a warmer objectIMO yours does. BTW, what happens to the warm object when it receives the cold photons does it increase its heat? What else would it do with it?Who cares again what happens when the photons move? do they collide, or do they hit the other object? You still haven't stated what happens to those cold photons. See, the warm photons will heat the cold object. What does that cold photon do? Heat the warm object? I mean that is the theory in warmersville.
Or perhaps they just miss the object. Ha
Who cares again what happens when the photons move?
Scientists and others who wish to have an intelligent conversation.
do they collide
No.
or do they hit the other object?
Yes.
You still haven't stated what happens to those cold photons
Any photon absorbed by matter adds energy.
So a "cold photon" that hits warmer matter adds energy, just as it would if it hit colder matter.
I mean that is the theory in warmersville.
Basic physics is not only for those who believe in AGW.
Your idiocy hurts the cause of those resisting AGW idiocy.
Or perhaps they just miss the object. Ha
Yes, SSDD's smart photon idiocy is funny.
Have you every observed that?
BTW, what happens to the warm object when it receives the cold photons does it increase its heat?
Yes. Absolutely.
Have you every observed that?
All the time.
the quote from toddster:
jc--BTW, what happens to the warm object when it receives the cold photons does it increase its heat?
todd-Yes. Absolutely.
Hmm, seems that's what he is saying.
Who cares again what happens when the photons move?
Scientists and others who wish to have an intelligent conversation.
do they collide
No.
or do they hit the other object?
Yes.
You still haven't stated what happens to those cold photons
Any photon absorbed by matter adds energy.
So a "cold photon" that hits warmer matter adds energy, just as it would if it hit colder matter.
I mean that is the theory in warmersville.
Basic physics is not only for those who believe in AGW.
Your idiocy hurts the cause of those resisting AGW idiocy.
Or perhaps they just miss the object. Ha
Yes, SSDD's smart photon idiocy is funny.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/14545135/
I guess jc feels that a "cold photon" that's absorbed only adds energy to a cooler object, but that the absorption magically adds no energy if it was absorbed by a warmer object.
I'm old fashioned, I don't believe in magic.
All photons that are absorbed add energy.