OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,600
- 2,220
I'm not kidding. I know they're more on Hillary's side, but they cover both sides, just not evenly. I agree they aren't any more impartial than Fox.You're kidding me, right? They spent a whole week with biased panel after panel discussing bogus made up Trump bashing topics. And they're still doing it. 95% of Hillary's so called lead is due to the lifting media and press do for the DNC.I hate commercials, so I flip back and forth between CNN and Fox when I'm watching the news. CNN DOES cover Hillary's lies and unfavorability numbers and top of the hour they bashed the New York Times for not reporting on Trump's news conference or whatever it was. They give more time to bashing Trump but it isn't as bad as you say. Don't even think about a media like North Korea's. You and I would both be in prison if our country was anywhere near what you say it is.
Wake up and smell the coffee, and don't even JOKE. If you're so worried about free speech in the media, don't vote for a man that has already pulled the press cards on a dozen media outlets/new publications because he didn't like their coverage.
Hilarious part is CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the radical left wing media consider themselves "impartial". Ha ha. Of course the only one's buying it pile of manure are other leftists.