Clinton Foundation.. 10% to Charity, 90% for them

[Lumpy 1]

Even 10% to charity is impressive for a 1% er Democrat..

... excerpt

If you take a narrower, and more realistic, view of the tax-exempt group’s expenditures by excluding obvious overhead expenses and focusing on direct grants to charities and governments, the numbers look much worse. In 2013, for example, only 10 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s expenditures were for direct charitable grants. The amount it spent on charitable grants–$8.8 million–was dwarfed by the $17.2 million it cumulatively spent on travel, rent, and office supplies. Between 2011 and 2013, the organization spent only 9.9 percent of the $252 million it collected on direct charitable grants.

The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent On Charity In 2013

 

[tinydancer]

I didn't think any charity could be worse than the Red Cross but the Clintons did it!

 

[AntiParty]

I don't doubt it, but I WILL warn you to never trust a chart without a source. Even then, think about how bias sources can skew it because this happens all the time.

 

[AntiParty]

Even 10% to charity is impressive for a 1% er Democrat..

... excerpt

If you take a narrower, and more realistic, view of the tax-exempt group’s expenditures by excluding obvious overhead expenses and focusing on direct grants to charities and governments, the numbers look much worse. In 2013, for example, only 10 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s expenditures were for direct charitable grants. The amount it spent on charitable grants–$8.8 million–was dwarfed by the $17.2 million it cumulatively spent on travel, rent, and office supplies. Between 2011 and 2013, the organization spent only 9.9 percent of the $252 million it collected on direct charitable grants.

The Clinton Foundation Only Spent 10 Percent On Charity In 2013

I just read what the Clinton Foundation is. lol. Perhaps the OP should.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Debunked,

by of all people, a Foxnews correspondent:

Fox News correspondent Eric Shawn debunked his Fox colleagues' earlier criticism that the Clinton Foundation spent just 10 percent of its budget on charitable activities in 2013, calling these claims "incredibly misleading" because the non-profit carries out its humanitarian programs in-house.

On the May 6 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Shawn addressed accusations of misconduct based on flawed analyses of the Clinton Foundation's expenditures.

When asked by host Bill O'Reilly about the "accusation ... that there only 10 percent of the money raised -- and it's $2 billion -- goes to grants out to poor people or institutions," Shawn responded, "That sounds really bad but it's actually incredibly misleading." Shawn went on to explain that "the way the charity works, they don't give grants to other charities -- they do most of it themselves." According to IRS filings, Shawn said, the Clinton Foundation's charitable spending is around 80 percent, and "the experts for charity say that's very good."

Fox Correspondent Debunks Colleagues On Clinton Foundation Charitable Spending Blog Media Matters for America