Clinton Files New Answers Under Oath about Email System Used It for the ‘Purpose of Convenience’

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by The Purge, Dec 14, 2018.

  1. The Purge

    The Purge Gold Member

    Aug 16, 2018
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    Purposes of convenience?.....WHAT CONVENIENCE???..The fucking bitch BROKE THE LAW PROSECUTE HER!!!...Even Comdy spelled it out for us and then let her go!!!

    Full title: Judicial Watch: Hillary Clinton Files New Answers Under Oath about Email System – Used It for the ‘Purpose of Convenience’

    Judicial Watch announced today Hillary Clinton submitted additional written answers under oath about her email system. Clinton testified that she used the controversial email system for the “purpose of convenience.” Clinton initially objected and refused to answer the questions but was ordered to do so last month by U.S. District Court Judge G Emmet Sullivan.

    The court ordered Clinton to “[D]escribe the creation of the domain name and the decision to set the domain up on the existing server, the date it was decided to create the domain and set it up on the existing server, who made those decisions, and when the domain became operational on the existing server.”

    Clinton answered under oath:

    Subject to and without waiving the forgoing objections, Secretary Clinton answers as follows: As Secretary Clinton prepared in late 2008/early 2009 to serve as Secretary of State, she was aware that President Clinton’s office had set up an e-mail system, but she had no role in this process. Secretary Clinton knew that President Clinton’s staff had recently upgraded that system. Secretary Clinton does not know what equipment that system used, how it was created, who decided that the system needed to be upgraded, or who else had accounts on the system. Secretary Clinton believes that one of the President’s aides, Justin Cooper, set up the system. Secretary Clinton decided to use a account on the system for the purpose of convenience. Secretary Clinton recalls that the account was created in early 2009.

    Read more at ...

    Just wondering.....

    <><> Who transported SOS Hillary’s server from NY to NJ’s Platte River Networks?
    <><>Did the Secret Service (who Hillary insists had been guarding it since it was really Bill’s Library/Foundation asset) accompany and supervise the transport of the server?
    <><> Per the interview with Platte River Networks, did they just take it, lock it up, not power it up, connect it to the internet, or not have it functioning as an active email server?
    <><> Was there continuity of server activity between May 2013 to August 2015, or did the server go off-line starting in June 2013?
    <><> Who received actual server in NJ - the name of the Platte River Networks employee/technician? What WAS it - make/model/form factor, etc.?
    <><> Did the Clinton Foundation (or issuer of the RFP on Hillary’s behalf) indicate that the company that would provide data services qualified to handle national-security-level data?
    <><> In various interviews and reports, Platte River Networks repeatedly stated they were to “upgrade, manage, and secure” the server. What - specifically - does that mean?
    <><> What did Hillary’s RFP/contract order the data center to do specifically?
    <><> Does Platte River Networks have sufficient security clearance to handle this type of contract?
    <><> What were the firewall protocols in place at the time?
    <><> Who - by name - had access to the server, and the administrative authorization to wipe and cleanse the server? When was that done?
    <><> Does “upgrade, manage, and secure” the server mean that they PRN was given the task to remove all data from the server when it received it in June 2013?
    <><> Was malware or antivirus also on the server?
    <><> Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system “upgraded, managed, and secured”?
    <><> Any incidents reported such as DOS attack, hacking, etc.? What were they? How were they resolved?
    <><> Other than arranging for the server to be moved from NY to NJ, what was the Denver company contracted to do in relation to maintaining the server?
    <><> What tangible evidence is there that the server arrived in functioning condition, was being used as an email server, was “upgraded, managed, and secured”, then wiped just prior to seizure by the FBI?
    <><> Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the server, and where would the back ups be kept?
    <><> If no backups were taken, was there a disaster recovery location?
    <><> Where was that? If no backups and no disaster recovery, what was the plan if the equipment failed or found to have been wiped of any functionality?
    <><> Were any foreign nationals employed at Platte River Networks, or at Datto, that had access to the Clinton server?
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Aba Incieni

    Aba Incieni Gold Member

    Dec 13, 2017
    Thanks Received:
    Trophy Points:
    I think she would rather have won the election and gone to jail than lose and remain free.
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1

Share This Page