I hope all your logically valid Argument 1 examples are coming along nicely! I'm very eager to see them and grateful for the learning experience.
I see a whole lot of words used to evade.
So, what data could falsify denialism?
None of the deniers will tell us. Meaning, by your standards, that denialism is a religious belief, hence there's no point wasting time on its acolytes.
Oh, Watts faked all his stuff. His writers do that. All the time. They don't get published there if they don't fake, fudge, torture and twist everything in the proper denier-PC manner. That would be the refutation of your nonsense link, that conspiracy blogs don't count as sources.