Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,947
- 9,980
- 2,040
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't do any preaching. He is simply reporting the results of polls. That leads us to wonder why you would make such suggestions. The hostility is self-evident. The cause, not so much. Do you not like it pointed out how far out in left field your views fall?
More like immune to reason, logic, and education.
How on Earth could YOU let anybody know about that when educated reasoning and logic are completely beyond your very limited comprehension, you poor retarded halfwit. As your rejection of the world scientific consensus on AGW clearly demonstrates.More like immune to reason, logic, and education.
When you post some, we'll let you know.
How on Earth could YOU let anybody know about that when educated reasoning and logic are completely beyond your very limited comprehension, you poor retarded halfwit. As your rejection of the world scientific consensus on AGW clearly demonstrates.More like immune to reason, logic, and education.
When you post some, we'll let you know.
How on Earth could YOU let anybody know about that when educated reasoning and logic are completely beyond your very limited comprehension, you poor retarded halfwit. As your rejection of the world scientific consensus on AGW clearly demonstrates.More like immune to reason, logic, and education.
When you post some, we'll let you know.
The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. Anyone who uses it is an ignoramus.
How on Earth could YOU let anybody know about that when educated reasoning and logic are completely beyond your very limited comprehension, you poor retarded halfwit. As your rejection of the world scientific consensus on AGW clearly demonstrates.More like immune to reason, logic, and education.
When you post some, we'll let you know.
The term "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron. Anyone who uses it is an ignoramus.
LOLOLOL.....so says the ignorant retard who knows nothing about science.
Scientific consensus
Scientific consensus is the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study. Consensus implies general agreement, though not necessarily unanimity.[1]
Consensus is normally achieved through communication at conferences, the publication process, replication (reproducible results by others), and peer review. These lead to a situation in which those within the discipline can often recognize such a consensus where it exists, but communicating to outsiders that consensus has been reached can be difficult, because the 'normal' debates through which science progresses may seem to outsiders as contestation.[2] On occasion, scientific institutes issue position statements intended to communicate a summary of the science from the "inside" to the "outside" of the scientific community. In cases where there is little controversy regarding the subject under study, establishing what the consensus is can be quite straightforward.
Bri only accepts Conservapedia as a source.
That's right Bri, everything that disagrees with your sacred party dogma is part of the VastGlobalSocialistConspiracy.
Oh wait, it's not. You're just a conspiracy cultist.
You've been power-pouting for years now. Has it gotten you anywhere? No. Hence, you might want to rethink your strategy of pouting even harder.
Wow. You just keep getting crazier. It's an impressive talent you have.
Wikipedia is edited by an army of Obama drones. You can't believe a thing in it that is even remotely political. Nothing could be more political than the definition of a term like "scientific consensus," which didn't even exist until the whole AGW brouhaha began.