Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say?

[American_Jihad]

This should be a fun thread...

Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say?
4.18.2016
News
Paul Bois

Video:
​

Continuing their efforts to undo the damage done by leftists in the university, the people at Prager U have released another video exposing "man-made climate change" as a myth concocted by narcissistic Chicken Littles.

Of course, "narcissistic Chicken Littles" is nowhere to be found in the new video "Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say?," narrated by atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen, but it's hard not to come away with that impression.

People say climate change skeptics are ones looking to profit from oil companies and interest groups, but the video does a decent job of demonstrating how that accusation cuts both ways.

...

As stated in the video, the alarmists are winning the argument. Hopefully, videos like this will turn that around.

Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say?

 

[The Great Goose]

It probably is happening but we can't stop it now.

 

[TNumber]

Global warning is such an obvious hoax. This summer was a really cold 1 4 me... its just hard 4 me 2 buy it when they give no proof or evidence

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

 

[TNumber]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

 

[American_Jihad]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

He's an Op-ed libtart...

 

[American_Jihad]

It probably is happening but we can't stop it now.

Man stop climate/change, rolmao...

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

No. You believe he and the 3% are right because it fits your ideology

 

[TNumber]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

No. You believe he and the 3% are right because it fits your ideology

u believe the other 97% only because they give u an excuse to force this evil called radical environmentalists down our throuts

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

No. You believe he and the 3% are right because it fits your ideology

u believe the other 97% only because they give u an excuse to force this evil called radical environmentalists down our throuts

No, I believe them because they are the overwhelming majority. Sort of like betting on the fastest horse.

 

[TNumber]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

No. You believe he and the 3% are right because it fits your ideology

u believe the other 97% only because they give u an excuse to force this evil called radical environmentalists down our throuts

No, I believe them because they are the overwhelming majority. Sort of like betting on the fastest horse.

well then u should convert 2 Christianity because its the worlds largest religion. we cant all be wrong, can we? or is it only okay when ur the one relying on the majority?

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

well then u should convert 2 Christianity because its the worlds largest religion. we cant all be wrong, can we? or is it only okay when ur the one relying on the majority?

why do some people aways mix religion with science?

 

[TNumber]

well then u should convert 2 Christianity because its the worlds largest religion. we cant all be wrong, can we? or is it only okay when ur the one relying on the majority?

why do some people aways mix religion with science?

Christianity isnt a religion its a relationship w/ Jesus.

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

Christianity isn't a religion? Okie Dokie.

inshallah

 

[TNumber]

Christianity isn't a religion? Okie Dokie.

inshallah

keep ur muslim language to urself u barbarian terrorist or ull ragret it, I swear 2 God

 

[Old Rocks]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

No, you silly ass, because of his hypothesis, like the Iris Affect, have been falsified. You put forth a bunch of hypothesis that get falsified, you lose credibility. And you state before the Congress of the US that tobacco is not harmful, and you lose all credibility, plus earning the title of a paid whore.

 

[Old Rocks]

Christianity isn't a religion? Okie Dokie.

inshallah

keep ur muslim language to urself u barbarian terrorist or ull ragret it, I swear 2 God

Damn, one just has to respect the intellect behind this post. LOL

 

[American_Jihad]

Christianity isn't a religion? Okie Dokie.

inshallah

Allah be damned...

 

[Martin Eden Mercury]

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures | Dana Nuccitelli

The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Richard Lindzen is one of the approximately 3 percent of climate scientists who believe the human influence on global warming is relatively small (though Lindzen is now retired, no longer doing scientific research). More importantly, he's been wrong about nearly every major climate argument he's made over the past two decades. Lindzen is arguably the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest.​

So just because hes in the minority he has to be wrong? this is the provlem with you athiest libtards

No, you silly ass, because of his hypothesis, like the Iris Affect, have been falsified. You put forth a bunch of hypothesis that get falsified, you lose credibility. And you state before the Congress of the US that tobacco is not harmful, and you lose all credibility, plus earning the title of a paid whore.

right on, right on