Class is in session

Dude, I know all that and more, I take exception to your professorial tone on the subject. Why should you care about terminology when we cannot even teach you the actual meaning of "communism" or "socialism"? Start using those words correctly and I might think about not calling your large capacity, combat style weapon an assault rifle as you wish.
deflection an irrelevant.

Oh no, it's completely relevant, if we all have a right to define our own terms to make things seem worse than they are I am going to call your scary looking combat style rifle an assault rifle and there is jack shit you can do about it. I have no actual interest in the gun argument but I thought this would be an awesome opportunity to show just what willful idiots you red scare morons are.

This thread is not about communism or socialism even though many dictators that confiscate firearms use those systems.
 
If you wanted to attract lib weenie interest you should have titled it something link 'buttplug fashions for '13'


Or New super fabulous fashion designs for Libs and their gay friends.
Or new ways to get the government to provide free birth control.
All the latest news on abortion procedures...amaze your friends and neighbors.

Libs they are funny..... :badgrin:
 
Getting large capacity magazines (+ 10 rounds) out of the hands of the cvilian population as well as high velocity semi auto rifles and quick relase buttons give defenders a chance.

Let me add this final comment; one AR 15 has more fire power than the black powder & ball muskets carried by Revolutonary War Soldiers a few years before the writing of the Second Amendment.

Those "Black powder & ball muskets" were probably amongst the deadliest handheld firearms of that time. Right?

a musket ball is about the size of a quarter image that entering an arm. It's not going to make a little small hole it's going to some major damage..
Oh, no doubt. My argument is that the muskets were probably the baddest assed handheld weapons (aka "assault weapons") of the time the Second Amendment was authored.
Revolutionary War Weapons, Revolutionary War Guns : Military Channel
 
deflection an irrelevant.

Oh no, it's completely relevant, if we all have a right to define our own terms to make things seem worse than they are I am going to call your scary looking combat style rifle an assault rifle and there is jack shit you can do about it. I have no actual interest in the gun argument but I thought this would be an awesome opportunity to show just what willful idiots you red scare morons are.

This thread is not about communism or socialism even though many dictators that confiscate firearms use those systems.

No it's about you trying to teach people proper terms for things and I refuse to accept your reality and substitute my own. We have been trying to tell you guys that Obama is not a commie for a very long time but you just won't listen so just for spite from now on if it looks like something a soldier or a terrorist might carry it's an assault rifle.
 
Last edited:
Oh no, it's completely relevant, if we all have a right to define our own terms to make things seem worse than they are I am going to call your scary looking combat style rifle an assault rifle and there is jack shit you can do about it. I have no actual interest in the gun argument but I thought this would be an awesome opportunity to show just what willful idiots you red scare morons are.

This thread is not about communism or socialism even though many dictators that confiscate firearms use those systems.

No it's about you trying to teach people proper terms for things and I refuse to accept your reality and substitute my own. We have been trying to tell you guys that Obama is not a commie for a very long time but you just won't listen so just for spite from now on if it looks like something a soldier or a terrorist might carry it's an assault rife.
If you want to talk about communism you must also talk about the dictators that confiscated firearms who also used those type of systems.
 
This thread is not about communism or socialism even though many dictators that confiscate firearms use those systems.

No it's about you trying to teach people proper terms for things and I refuse to accept your reality and substitute my own. We have been trying to tell you guys that Obama is not a commie for a very long time but you just won't listen so just for spite from now on if it looks like something a soldier or a terrorist might carry it's an assault rife.
If you want to talk about communism you must also talk about the dictators that confiscated firearms who also used those type of systems.

Don't really want to talk about anything with you, I am more pointing out the irony of a conservative who makes up his own erroneous political definitions from scratch trying to teach the ignorant liberals the proper terms for things.
 
No it's about you trying to teach people proper terms for things and I refuse to accept your reality and substitute my own. We have been trying to tell you guys that Obama is not a commie for a very long time but you just won't listen so just for spite from now on if it looks like something a soldier or a terrorist might carry it's an assault rife.
If you want to talk about communism you must also talk about the dictators that confiscated firearms who also used those type of systems.

Don't really want to talk about anything with you, I am more pointing out the irony of a conservative who makes up his own erroneous political definitions from scratch trying to teach the ignorant liberals the proper terms for things.

Look I know the difference as was pointed out to your earlier you have a narrow view of what communism is.
 
If you want to talk about communism you must also talk about the dictators that confiscated firearms who also used those type of systems.

Don't really want to talk about anything with you, I am more pointing out the irony of a conservative who makes up his own erroneous political definitions from scratch trying to teach the ignorant liberals the proper terms for things.

Look I know the difference as was pointed out to your earlier you have a narrow view of what communism is.

And you have a pretty narrow definition of what a rifle designed entirely for killing multiple humans is so I guess we are even.
 
OK anti gun people if you're going to make an argument for an assault weapons ban at least have a little basic knowledge on the subject
1. There is not such thing as a 100 round clip, it's called a 100 round drum magazine as a matter of fact their is no such thing as a 30 round clip, that would be a 30 round magazine
2. An assault weapon has a select fire switch that allows the firearm to shoot burst of three or more rounds at one pull of the twiggier
3. A semi Automatic cannot spray 100 rounds in seconds
It can however expend 30 rounds as quickly as the shoooter can flex his finger
4.A semi automatic rifle is not an assault rifle
5. A revolver function the same as a semi automatic firearm.
Six rounds (yeah, I know about speed loaders)
6. A hunting rifle is not a good choice for home defense for two reasons
a. the length can be taken away from you
b. over penetration of projectile you could accidentally shoot a round through your neighbors house if you ever needed to use it.
True, High velocity rounds travel well, easy to miss a target when under stress, making for unintended consequences.
7. Home invaders aren't lone wolves they for the most part do it in pairs if not more.
All the more reason to defend one's home with a short barrell shotgun.
8. we had mass shooting during the last assault weapons ban.
I hope this helps.

Getting large capacity magazines (+ 10 rounds) out of the hands of the cvilian population as well as high velocity semi auto rifles and quick relase buttons give defenders a chance.

Let me add this final comment; one AR 15 has more fire power than the black powder & ball muskets carried by Revolutonary War Soldiers a few years before the writing of the Second Amendment.

Those "Black powder & ball muskets" were probably amongst the deadliest handheld firearms of that time. Right?

Correct. The one in the mind of those who passed the Second Amendment
 
Don't really want to talk about anything with you, I am more pointing out the irony of a conservative who makes up his own erroneous political definitions from scratch trying to teach the ignorant liberals the proper terms for things.

Look I know the difference as was pointed out to your earlier you have a narrow view of what communism is.

And you have a pretty narrow definition of what a rifle designed entirely for killing multiple humans is so I guess we are even.
No I don't have a narrow view, I do have a Constitutional right to firearms any that would be suitable to militia use.
 
Getting large capacity magazines (+ 10 rounds) out of the hands of the cvilian population as well as high velocity semi auto rifles and quick relase buttons give defenders a chance.

Let me add this final comment; one AR 15 has more fire power than the black powder & ball muskets carried by Revolutonary War Soldiers a few years before the writing of the Second Amendment.

Those "Black powder & ball muskets" were probably amongst the deadliest handheld firearms of that time. Right?

Correct. The one in the mind of those who passed the Second Amendment

They all had equal fire power the citizen, the sheriff (LEO) and the military.
 
Number 4 is incorrect.

The military uses assault weapons. Not one of those firearms function only as a semi automatic weapon. The assault weapon can be switch to an automatic weapon, a semi automatic cannot.

Nope. That fucker in Connecticut used assault weapons. Your definition is too limited. Pay attention to the forthcoming legislation.
 
Getting large capacity magazines (+ 10 rounds) out of the hands of the cvilian population as well as high velocity semi auto rifles and quick relase buttons give defenders a chance.

Let me add this final comment; one AR 15 has more fire power than the black powder & ball muskets carried by Revolutonary War Soldiers a few years before the writing of the Second Amendment.

Those "Black powder & ball muskets" were probably amongst the deadliest handheld firearms of that time. Right?

a musket ball is about the size of a quarter image that entering an arm. It's not going to make a little small hole it's going to some major damage..

I suppose that is true, and a rifleman might get a hit how often? And, how many balls could he put in the air in one minute. Three?
 
Look I know the difference as was pointed out to your earlier you have a narrow view of what communism is.

And you have a pretty narrow definition of what a rifle designed entirely for killing multiple humans is so I guess we are even.
No I don't have a narrow view, I do have a Constitutional right to firearms any that would be suitable to militia use.

You say that but you know it is not entirely accurate. The government has every right to ban weapon types, accessories and modifications on public safety grounds.
 
Number 4 is incorrect.

The military uses assault weapons. Not one of those firearms function only as a semi automatic weapon. The assault weapon can be switch to an automatic weapon, a semi automatic cannot.

Nope. That fucker in Connecticut used assault weapons. Your definition is too limited. Pay attention to the forthcoming legislation.

He did not use an automatic rifle therefore he did not have an assault weapon.
 

Forum List

Back
Top