Liability
Locked Account.
- Thread starter
- #41
I'm still unclear as to the flip?
Roberts was (reportedly) on board with logic and conservatism (they work well together) UNTIL he evidently took political note of the 'dire consequences' to the 'public' perception of SCOTUS legitimacy.*
What evidence supports your conclusion that logic and conservatism work well together?
So he and Kennedy (supposedly) went at it. Oddly enough, Kennedy (whom many suspected might be the weak link against a proper honest Constitutionally sound ruling) held tough. But the CJ -- for reasons having to do with institutional concerns, not the law or the Constitutionality of the Act, which was supposed to be the only thing on his mind pursuant to his fucking oath -- became the weak link. He couldn't persuade one single honest, rational, non-partisan-hack on the Court to join him in his cowardly, craven abdication.
Is this your opinion or have you and the CJ discussed his vote in detail?
_________________
* In other words, he took the shrill harpish dishonest partisan shill polemic from the liberal media as being valid.
In other words he must be a RINO, a person who doesn't hold fast to an ideology no matter the consequences of doing so (when logic and conservatism collide)
Wry: Seriously, after this much time on the Boards, you REALLY need to learn how to use the quote function.
The REASON I said things like "supposedly" and "reportedly" is because I am conveying information I got elsewhere.
I mean, don't be such a dork. I haven't had any chats with the CJ. But I can read.
And if you had held your water for a moment longer, you'd even SEE the source I allude to, because I inserted THIS link in my prior post:
Roberts switched views to uphold health care law - CBS News