Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Rabbi deliberately mischaracterizes Dogbert's comments. The questions are slanted to a conservative view of economics. Anyone who has studied the field recognizes that without any problem. The Rabbi undoubtedly knows it as well, which means that he is trying to deliberately deceive again because he cannot carry a disagreement on its merits. Either that, or he is either mentally feeble or ignorant.
The Rabbi deliberately mischaracterizes Dogbert's comments. The questions are slanted to a conservative view of economics. Anyone who has studied the field recognizes that without any problem. The Rabbi undoubtedly knows it as well, which means that he is trying to deliberately deceive again because he cannot carry a disagreement on its merits. Either that, or he is either mentally feeble or ignorant.
☭proletarian☭;2194119 said:How could do this?
33) If taxes equal government spending, then: Government debt is zero! They thought that tax per person equals government spending per person was the right answer: And that has no basis in arithmetic or logic.
Taxes = money taken from populace
'spending'= government expenditure.
Total Taxes/population = x
If public expenditure = taxes, then
(taxes/population) = (public expenditure/population)
We're dealing with averages, not the mean, mode, or taxation of any given individual.
And no, it doesn't mean public debt=0, as their could already be a debt in place before taxation and expenditure become zero.
The Rabbi deliberately mischaracterizes Dogbert's comments. The questions are slanted to a conservative view of economics. Anyone who has studied the field recognizes that without any problem. The Rabbi undoubtedly knows it as well, which means that he is trying to deliberately deceive again because he cannot carry a disagreement on its merits. Either that, or he is either mentally feeble or ignorant.
The Rabbi deliberately mischaracterizes Dogbert's comments. The questions are slanted to a conservative view of economics. Anyone who has studied the field recognizes that without any problem. The Rabbi undoubtedly knows it as well, which means that he is trying to deliberately deceive again because he cannot carry a disagreement on its merits. Either that, or he is either mentally feeble or ignorant.
Meanwhile it was a civics quiz, not an economics quiz.
Rabbi, what have you offered the forum other than a half-baked form of libertarianism?
Rabbi, what have you offered the forum other than a half-baked form of libertarianism?
I know, I know! He offers profanity, arrogance, and a mean spirit.
Rabbi, what have you offered the forum other than a half-baked form of libertarianism?
I know, I know! He offers profanity, arrogance, and a mean spirit.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time. Searching out links that support the facts I've offered result in two things: straight out denial of their validity or total silence.
But I try. Even with dumbshits like you and Starkey.
I know, I know! He offers profanity, arrogance, and a mean spirit.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time. Searching out links that support the facts I've offered result in two things: straight out denial of their validity or total silence.
But I try. Even with dumbshits like you and Starkey.
LOL, a trifecta, profane, arrogant and mean spirited.
a trifecta, profane, arrogant and mean spirited
Rabbi, what have you offered the forum other than a half-baked form of libertarianism?
I know, I know! He offers profanity, arrogance, and a mean spirit.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time. Searching out links that support the facts I've offered result in two things: straight out denial of their validity or total silence.
But I try. Even with dumbshits like you and Starkey.
I know, I know! He offers profanity, arrogance, and a mean spirit.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time. Searching out links that support the facts I've offered result in two things: straight out denial of their validity or total silence.
But I try. Even with dumbshits like you and Starkey.
You have just projected on yourself the argument rejecting your own points, Rab. You have offered nothing but half-baked nonsense. Whether full- or half- or under-baked, nonsense is still nonsense, and that, podjo, is what you are offering. Get over it; you have a massive FAIL here.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time.
which is why people from both sides of the aisle treat you with the contempt you deserve.
The Rabbi deliberately mischaracterizes Dogbert's comments. The questions are slanted to a conservative view of economics. Anyone who has studied the field recognizes that without any problem. The Rabbi undoubtedly knows it as well, which means that he is trying to deliberately deceive again because he cannot carry a disagreement on its merits. Either that, or he is either mentally feeble or ignorant.
Meanwhile it was a civics quiz, not an economics quiz.
You think economics has nothing to do with government policy?
Rabbi, what have you offered the forum other than a half-baked form of libertarianism?
I know, I know! He offers profanity, arrogance, and a mean spirit.
Because that's all the ignorant deserve. Rational arguments are a waste of time. Searching out links that support the facts I've offered result in two things: straight out denial of their validity or total silence.
But I try. Even with dumbshits like you and Starkey.
You answered 29 out of 33 correctly — 87.88 %
Average score for this quiz during April: 74.7%
☭proletarian☭;2197833 said:Meanwhile it was a civics quiz, not an economics quiz.
You think economics has nothing to do with government policy?
It went right past you, didn't it?
Indeed, when The Rabbi writes that, "The sad state of economics knowledge among the general run of citizens in this country is responsible for a lot of mischief", he is referring to the general run of the reactionaries wierdos on the far right, not the normal GOP.
You mean like those idiots who still believe in the magic of Trickle down and how tax cuts for the wealthy makes jobs?"The sad state of economics knowledge among the general run of citizens in this country is responsible for a lot of mischief"
