Christopher Steele used investigate from CNN as his unverified source on his dossier

[Lovebears65]

Christopher Steele says he used unverified information to support details about web company in dossier Clinton bought this dossier she is the only one colluding with anyone

 

[occupied]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

 

[depotoo]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

 

[BULLDOG]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

 

[Seawytch]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Did you read ALL the transcripts?

 

[depotoo]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

 

[depotoo]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Did you read ALL the transcripts?

Yes, any that have been released, as well as the indictments. Have you?

 

[Seawytch]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Did you read ALL the transcripts?

Yes, any that have been released, as well as the indictments. Have you?

Nope, I have a life. Which ones have you read? Give us some bullet points?

 

[Ambivalent1]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Did you read ALL the transcripts?

Yes, any that have been released, as well as the indictments. Have you?

Nope, I have a life. Which ones have you read? Give us some bullet points?

Do your own damn research you lazy assed Canuck. You could see a pic of Hillary giving Pootie head and still defend her.

 

[depotoo]

Dear, if you care enough, go read them yourself. I have posted about them each time they have come out, if you really care to see them. I have even posted portions of pages of them here.

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Did you read ALL the transcripts?

Yes, any that have been released, as well as the indictments. Have you?

Nope, I have a life. Which ones have you read? Give us some bullet points?

 

[BULLDOG]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

 

[depotoo]

Honey, read it. There is no charge of espionage.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

 

[Ambivalent1]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

LOL, I know you that you were being clever, but you weren't.

 

[occupied]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Actually you should quit viewing all this as 100% fabrication. I cannot imagine the level of self-deception it takes to see Trump entirely innocent of any wrongdoing whatsoever.

 

[Thinker101]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

Great, next you can indict the man in the moon...dumbass.

 

[Ambivalent1]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Actually, maybe you should take the time to read all the transcripts, etc, then get back to us.

Actually you should quit viewing all this as 100% fabrication. I cannot imagine the level of self-deception it takes to see Trump entirely innocent of any wrongdoing whatsoever.

Everything you don't is a "fabrication", how convenient for you Boris.

 

[BULLDOG]

Honey, read it. There is no charge of espionage.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

Conducting large scale cyber operations to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election under the orders of a hostile foreign government is espionage, you dumb ass.

 

[Hellokitty]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

Where is the indictment of Carter Page, the FBI identified Page as a spy for Russia, so don't you think it's odd they have never charged Page with anything?

 

[Ambivalent1]

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

Interesting, not an American among them.

 

[depotoo]

That is not espionage,
Espionage Act of 1917.
What is the Espionage Act. The Espionage Act is a law that was created in 1917, shortly after the United States joined World War I. The Act was created to protect the United States by prohibiting its citizens from supporting the nation's enemies during wartime. It also made it illegal for citizens to obstruct military operations during wartime,...

nor were any in his campaign charged, even with that

Honey, read it. There is no charge of espionage.

https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

You should read this article more carefully. You should also ask yourself why you are taking the losing side of defamation suit brought by a Russian tech company that hosted the activities of a hostile espionage operation against us.

Don't bother asking why. Supporting Dingbat Don and defending Russian espionage against the U.S. is the same thing. That's what this illegitimate presidency has degenerated to.

Who has been charged with espionage?

View attachment 250690

Conducting large scale cyber operations to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election under the orders of a hostile foreign government is espionage, you dumb ass.
View attachment 250693