Steerpike
VIP Member
- Dec 17, 2007
- 1,847
- 182
- 83
Nope, I read all that and understood it perfectly.
I'm just not one to jump to conclusions based on hearsay simply because of a built in confirmation bias.
Ah...time to move on to more intelligent poster's, I'm afraid. You not only couldn't read the article, you can't read my posts and understand them either. It is clear from my posts that I don't have a conclusion about the case. There isn't enough information in the article to form one. You are obviously a victim of your own biases here and think you see things that you really don't in everyone else's words.