(Christian) Scientist alleges religious discrimination

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by manifold, Dec 17, 2010.

  1. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    55,111
    Thanks Received:
    8,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +32,301


    read more
     
  2. rdean
    Online

    rdean Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    If the American right wing wants to be stupid, go for it. Just don't infect the rest of the nation with that religious nonsense.

    6% of scientists are Republican for a good reason. Because most Republicans left "reason" at the "alter".
     
  3. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    55,111
    Thanks Received:
    8,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +32,301
    I have no problem with the university passing him over based on concerns about his scientific objectivity.

    I would've done the same.
     
  4. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    55,111
    Thanks Received:
    8,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +32,301
    But props for immediately chiming in with your favorite stat rdean. :thup:
     
  5. rdean
    Online

    rdean Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    My "favorite" stat is, "90% of the Republican Party is white and mostly Christian". My SECOND favorite is "Only 6% of scientists" are Republican.

    Believe me, it shows.
     
  6. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,017
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,226
    :cuckoo:

    This guy was qualified for the job and passed over because of his lifestyle choice, if he was passed over because he was homosexual you would be screaming and ranting a different tune. You should at least try to be logically consistent instead of just consistently illogical.
     
  7. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,017
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,226
    Did they pass him over because of concerns about his objectivity or because they are biased against Christians? Unless they can sho something in his published work that supports their concerns about the lack of objectivity I do not seem them justifying it that way.
     
  8. pinqy
    Offline

    pinqy Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,594
    Thanks Received:
    642
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,241
    Why? Based on the article there is no real reason to have concerns about his objectivity...the complaints are all speculative or unbacked opinion. Notes from one lecture aimed at a Christian audience does not mean he is biased and/or not objective. He specifically denies Young Earth Creationism.

    Based on the article, it looks like the decison was made out of bias and not solid facts about his teaching/methodology.
     
  9. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    55,111
    Thanks Received:
    8,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +32,301
    Actually, if you want to take his side on this, it's up to you (really him) to show that it was merely a bias against Christians.

    I'd wager they have plenty of Christians working at UK so good luck with that. :thup:
     
  10. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    55,111
    Thanks Received:
    8,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +32,301
    I read the same article and concluded his objectivity is questionable.

    Go figure.
     

Share This Page