Change The Question For Europe

[Flanders]

My gal Judi asked:

. . . If there is, as Barack Obama and many ‘world leaders’ contend, no such thing as Islamic terrorism, how then can there possibly be such a thing as ‘‘Islamophobia’?​

‘Foist-a-phobia’ mainstream media coined the term ‘Islamophobia’
By Judi McLeod January 20, 2015

8216 Foist-a-phobia 8217 mainstream media coined the term 8216 Islamophobia 8217 ​

Judi’s penetrating question cannot be answered in America as long as Islam remains a political movement.

There is no such thing as world leaders; so listening to Europe’s national leaders defending Islam the religion you have to ask if they must love Islam the political movement more than they love their own culture and sovereignty?

Here is a suggestion. Americans should try convincing non-Muslim countries to adopt the first 16 words in our First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .​

Success would at least confine theocracy, and Muslims, to Islamic countries. And what is wrong with that result?

To be honest, my suggestion is not going anywhere because American judges flat refuse to define Islam as a political movement regardless of the First Amendment. If America refuses to defend its own Constitution nobody else will adopt it. Bottom line: Treating Islam as a ‘ religion of peace’ is the one and only reason Muslims are getting away with their worldwide caliphate horse manure. In fact, most people would not want to live in a theocracy in the their own country let only live in a global theocracy by any name.

Finally, back up one step and you will see that Islam the religion was never separated from Islam the political movement. There is a snowball’s chance in hell of turning Muslims away from theocracy after they’ve practiced it since the 7th century. Even America’s brilliant Constitution protecting Americans from theocracy you can see more than a few touchy-feely non-Muslim fools willingly follow Taqiyya the Liar to the slaughterhouse.

Put it in perspective this way: Convince Christians to give up their religion after 2,000 years.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The neologism "Islamophobia" was created in order to align the opinions of useful idiots in the west with the Islamists they serve. Criticism of Islam is punishable by law in most Islamic states, and the practitioners of this term in the west are trying to shame us into following suit by making the telling of the truth so uncomfortable to people that they submit. By attaching a stigma to the resistance of a political ideology, they hope to make such a political ideology just as inviolate here as it is there.

It has become so ridiculous that even criticizing a Muslim calling for genocide of Jews results in these sorts of attacks, to which threads in this very forum will attest.

 

[Flanders]

The neologism "Islamophobia" was created in order to align the opinions of useful idiots in the west with the Islamists they serve. Criticism of Islam is punishable by law in most Islamic states, and the practitioners of this term in the west are trying to shame us into following suit by making the telling of the truth so uncomfortable to people that they submit. By attaching a stigma to the resistance of a political ideology, they hope to make such a political ideology just as inviolate here as it is there.

It has become so ridiculous that even criticizing a Muslim calling for genocide of Jews results in these sorts of attacks, to which threads in this very forum will attest.

To Dogmaphope: Your responses in my threads remind me of:

​