Cast Lead a Success

[Marc39]

Ah, the old 1993 stock footage of the Palestinians celebrating the signing of Oslo.

The Oslo interim agreement was signed in 1995, not '93.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Ah, the old 1993 stock footage of the Palestinians celebrating the signing of Oslo.

The Oslo interim agreement was signed in 1995, not '93.

You got me there, dude.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I know you squish ones and the Israel does everything bad ones will say Cast Lead was un just assault. There are plenty of threads on that one.

In these thread is about the undeniability of Cast Lead success. Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist fractions were firing dozens upon dozens of daily missile attacks at Israel. Israel tried to stop the attacks without a full scale invasion. Targeted killing? Nope missile came. Blockade? Nope. Just Israeli invaded to stop the missile attacks! That was the objective.

Guess what, it worked! There been only a handful of missiles fired and none have come close to the target. Hamas has even called on all other terrorist organizations to stop firing missiles or face retributions.

Say what you want, but Cast Lead was a success!

If you believe that counting rockets is a measure of success, you have a very narrow view of the conflict.

Hamas was severely weakened and afraid. The missile attacks stopped, which all other means used over the last 2 years did nothing. These were the 2 stated reasons, with stopping the missile attacks as the main one. So yes douche bag, its a value measure of success.

Quick Question: where does a skin-head redneck with no education like yourself think he has the upper authority on anyone on any subject?

Stopping the rockets was a strategic decision like stopping suicide bombing years ago. They are seeking peaceful solutions to the problem.

EU parliamentary delegation visits blockaded Gaza

 

[Marc39]

Ah, the old 1993 stock footage of the Palestinians celebrating the signing of Oslo.

The Oslo interim agreement was signed in 1995, not '93.

You got me there, dude.

I 'got you" in every one of your uninformed posts.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Oslo interim agreement was signed in 1995, not '93.

You got me there, dude.

I 'got you" in every one of your uninformed posts.

Delusions of grandeur.

 

[P F Tinmore]

If you believe that counting rockets is a measure of success, you have a very narrow view of the conflict.

Hamas was severely weakened and afraid. The missile attacks stopped, which all other means used over the last 2 years did nothing. These were the 2 stated reasons, with stopping the missile attacks as the main one. So yes douche bag, its a value measure of success.

Quick Question: where does a skin-head redneck with no education like yourself think he has the upper authority on anyone on any subject?

Stopping the rockets was a strategic decision like stopping suicide bombing years ago. They are seeking peaceful solutions to the problem.

EU parliamentary delegation visits blockaded Gaza

The Gaza Freedom March, a coalition of several groups, consisted of 1,362 activists from more than 40 countries who were on a mission to cross to Gaza and, along with Israeli, Palestinian and international peace activists, to march simultaneously to the Israeli Erez checkpoint.

The valiant peace warriors of Viva Palestina have truly set new standards for how far a peace and justice activist is willing to go to back up his/her words with actions. Many millions around the world watched — despite the mainstream media’s shameless disregard of the unfolding drama — as nearly 500 activists and their 200 vehicles, laden with badly needed medical supplies for besieged Gaza, took off on a historic odyssey to break the siege.

These are not Palestinians, but internationals. From Malaysia to South Africa, from the UK to the U.S., men, women, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, people of different cultural and political backgrounds showed themselves as unified in their belief in justice and human rights. While Palestine has always enjoyed universal solidarity, with many fearless activists — who can forget Rachel Corrie? — a collective action of this magnitude and of this level of commitment is a new addition to a conflict that has been reduced over time to that of beleaguered Palestinians and a militarily powerful Israel.

An Odyssey for Justice By Ramzy Baroud

 

[Marc39]

Hamas was severely weakened and afraid. The missile attacks stopped, which all other means used over the last 2 years did nothing. These were the 2 stated reasons, with stopping the missile attacks as the main one. So yes douche bag, its a value measure of success.

Quick Question: where does a skin-head redneck with no education like yourself think he has the upper authority on anyone on any subject?

Stopping the rockets was a strategic decision like stopping suicide bombing years ago. They are seeking peaceful solutions to the problem.

EU parliamentary delegation visits blockaded Gaza

The Gaza Freedom March, a coalition of several groups, consisted of 1,362 activists from more than 40 countries who were on a mission to cross to Gaza and, along with Israeli, Palestinian and international peace activists, to march simultaneously to the Israeli Erez checkpoint.

The valiant peace warriors of Viva Palestina have truly set new standards for how far a peace and justice activist is willing to go to back up his/her words with actions. Many millions around the world watched — despite the mainstream media’s shameless disregard of the unfolding drama — as nearly 500 activists and their 200 vehicles, laden with badly needed medical supplies for besieged Gaza, took off on a historic odyssey to break the siege.

These are not Palestinians, but internationals. From Malaysia to South Africa, from the UK to the U.S., men, women, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, people of different cultural and political backgrounds showed themselves as unified in their belief in justice and human rights. While Palestine has always enjoyed universal solidarity, with many fearless activists — who can forget Rachel Corrie? — a collective action of this magnitude and of this level of commitment is a new addition to a conflict that has been reduced over time to that of beleaguered Palestinians and a militarily powerful Israel.

An Odyssey for Justice By Ramzy Baroud

Too bad the Gazan trash chose to create their own Somalia instead of building their own Singapore. But, Arabs are, generally, losers.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Stopping the rockets was a strategic decision like stopping suicide bombing years ago. They are seeking peaceful solutions to the problem.

EU parliamentary delegation visits blockaded Gaza

The Gaza Freedom March, a coalition of several groups, consisted of 1,362 activists from more than 40 countries who were on a mission to cross to Gaza and, along with Israeli, Palestinian and international peace activists, to march simultaneously to the Israeli Erez checkpoint.

The valiant peace warriors of Viva Palestina have truly set new standards for how far a peace and justice activist is willing to go to back up his/her words with actions. Many millions around the world watched — despite the mainstream media’s shameless disregard of the unfolding drama — as nearly 500 activists and their 200 vehicles, laden with badly needed medical supplies for besieged Gaza, took off on a historic odyssey to break the siege.

These are not Palestinians, but internationals. From Malaysia to South Africa, from the UK to the U.S., men, women, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, people of different cultural and political backgrounds showed themselves as unified in their belief in justice and human rights. While Palestine has always enjoyed universal solidarity, with many fearless activists — who can forget Rachel Corrie? — a collective action of this magnitude and of this level of commitment is a new addition to a conflict that has been reduced over time to that of beleaguered Palestinians and a militarily powerful Israel.

An Odyssey for Justice By Ramzy Baroud

Too bad the Gazan trash chose to create their own Somalia instead of building their own Singapore. But, Arabs are, generally, losers.

Israel has been trashing Gaza's economy since long before Hamas was elected.

 

[Marc39]

Israel has been trashing Gaza's economy since long before Hamas was elected.

Wrong, dummy.

When Israel controlled Gaza prior to withdrawing, the Gazan economy was one of the fastest-growing in the world, with the lowest unemployment levels in history, the lowest infant mortality and the highest life expectancies. 150 medical centers had been built. Law and order prevailed.

Indeed, there are Gazans who wish Israel would return to Gaza because they were more prosperous, then...
In one town, Gazans yearn for previous Israeli presence / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

Pallies trashed their own economy in looting the state-of-the-art greenhouses gifted them by wealthy Jews who paid $14 million for them that were designed to grow and export vegetables, fruits and flowers...
USATODAY.com - Despite funds and protection, Gaza greenhouses looted

It was Pulitzer Prize-winning NY Times journalist Thomas Friedman who has criticized Gazans for creating their own Somalia when they had a chance to create their own Singapore.

So, dummy, once again, you show a total lack of insight into the matter.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel has been trashing Gaza's economy since long before Hamas was elected.

Wrong, dummy.

When Israel controlled Gaza prior to withdrawing, the Gazan economy was one of the fastest-growing in the world, with the lowest unemployment levels in history, the lowest infant mortality and the highest life expectancies. 150 medical centers had been built. Law and order prevailed.

Indeed, there are Gazans who wish Israel would return to Gaza because they were more prosperous, then...
In one town, Gazans yearn for previous Israeli presence / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

Pallies trashed their own economy in looting the state-of-the-art greenhouses gifted them by wealthy Jews who paid $14 million for them that were designed to grow and export vegetables, fruits and flowers...
USATODAY.com - Despite funds and protection, Gaza greenhouses looted

It was Pulitzer Prize-winning NY Times journalist Thomas Friedman who has criticized Gazans for creating their own Somalia when they had a chance to create their own Singapore.

So, dummy, once again, you show a total lack of insight into the matter.

You are so misinformed. Let's turn to that famous Palestinian propaganda site, World Net Daily.

JERUSALEM – After months of intense negotiations recently culminating in a deal allowing for the transfer of Gaza's high-tech Jewish greenhouses to the Palestinians, several former Jewish residents who briefly returned to their farms told WND they were shocked to find most of their produce has died because Israel turned off the water in the area.

"I couldn't believe it. Almost all of my crops are dead, and the rest is dying," Anita Tucker, one of the pioneer farmers of Jewish Gaza told WND. "I hope the Palestinians aren't expecting fresh produce. ... A fortune in crops is now all gone."

Israel shuts off water, dries Gaza greenhouses

When Israel "left" Gaza they restricted the import of things Gaza needed to support their economy. Hundreds of tons of Palestinian produce rotted while Israel would not allow them to export. Of course this is pre Hamas so that boogyman does not apply.

 

[Marc39]

When Israel "left" Gaza they restricted the import of things Gaza needed to support their economy. Hundreds of tons of Palestinian produce rotted while Israel would not allow them to export. Of course this is pre Hamas so that boogyman does not apply.

Dummy, the Pallies looted the greenhouses and had no "produce" to export.

You're such a dummy.

 

[P F Tinmore]

When Israel "left" Gaza they restricted the import of things Gaza needed to support their economy. Hundreds of tons of Palestinian produce rotted while Israel would not allow them to export. Of course this is pre Hamas so that boogyman does not apply.

Dummy, the Pallies looted the greenhouses and had no "produce" to export.

You're such a dummy.

This crisis in Gaza predates Hamas’s victory in 2006. For the first twenty-five years of Israel’s occupation (1967-1993) Gaza was a place of misery. As Sarah Roy brilliantly describes in her book, The Gaza Strip: The Political Economy of Re-development, Israel ruthlessly suppressed Gaza’s people, while denying them economic growth opportunities. During this time, no infrastructure (sewers, paved roads, etc.) was built and the population was reduced to, in the words of one Israeli Minister, “hewers of wood, and bearers of water,” i.e., demeaning day labor employment in Israel.

Gaza’s only hope after the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993 was that its economy and infrastructure could be developed and opened up to the outside world. While many in the West blamed Palestinian Authority (PA) mismanagement, the facts point in a different direction. It was the persistence of the occupation from 1994-2005 that resulted in Gaza’s continued stagnation. Despite “peace on paper,” Israel retained an iron grip on Gaza. Settlements remained, as did the physical division of Gaza, north from south and from the rest of Palestinian lands and the outside world. Being denied access and egress meant difficulty in importing and exporting and, therefore, no economic development.

When Israel unilaterally redeployed from Gaza in 2005, the situation deteriorated even further. While Israel was able to project its removal of 7000 settlers as a “painful sacrifice for peace,” by refusing to coordinate their departure with the PA or even to honor the agreement they negotiated with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (that should have guaranteed movement in and out of Gaza), Israel left behind disarray and an angry and impoverished population. By tightening their external controls on the tiny strip, Israel, in effect, created one of the world’s largest prison camps. Inside Gaza, Palestinians were “free,” troubled only by their own poverty and armed gangs. Like prisoners, they could have occasional visitors and receive gifts – but, for the most part, they remained cut off from the outside world.

The economy, already crippled, worsened. With Israel refusing to open Gaza’s borders to goods, small Palestinian factories that had once sub-contracted with larger Israeli firms were forced to close. And this summer, tens of millions of dollars of Palestinian produce rotted at the check points because Israel refused to allow them to be exported.

Watching Gaza: ‘The Genovese Syndrome’ « Bir Münzevînin Notlarından…

You need to catch up.

 

[Marc39]

When Israel "left" Gaza they restricted the import of things Gaza needed to support their economy. Hundreds of tons of Palestinian produce rotted while Israel would not allow them to export. Of course this is pre Hamas so that boogyman does not apply.

Dummy, the Pallies looted the greenhouses and had no "produce" to export.

You're such a dummy.

This crisis in Gaza predates Hamas’s victory in 2006. For the first twenty-five years of Israel’s occupation (1967-1993) Gaza was a place of misery. As Sarah Roy brilliantly describes in her book, The Gaza Strip: The Political Economy of Re-development, Israel ruthlessly suppressed Gaza’s people, while denying them economic growth opportunities. During this time, no infrastructure (sewers, paved roads, etc.) was built and the population was reduced to, in the words of one Israeli Minister, “hewers of wood, and bearers of water,” i.e., demeaning day labor employment in Israel.

Gaza’s only hope after the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993 was that its economy and infrastructure could be developed and opened up to the outside world. While many in the West blamed Palestinian Authority (PA) mismanagement, the facts point in a different direction. It was the persistence of the occupation from 1994-2005 that resulted in Gaza’s continued stagnation. Despite “peace on paper,” Israel retained an iron grip on Gaza. Settlements remained, as did the physical division of Gaza, north from south and from the rest of Palestinian lands and the outside world. Being denied access and egress meant difficulty in importing and exporting and, therefore, no economic development.

When Israel unilaterally redeployed from Gaza in 2005, the situation deteriorated even further. While Israel was able to project its removal of 7000 settlers as a “painful sacrifice for peace,” by refusing to coordinate their departure with the PA or even to honor the agreement they negotiated with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (that should have guaranteed movement in and out of Gaza), Israel left behind disarray and an angry and impoverished population. By tightening their external controls on the tiny strip, Israel, in effect, created one of the world’s largest prison camps. Inside Gaza, Palestinians were “free,” troubled only by their own poverty and armed gangs. Like prisoners, they could have occasional visitors and receive gifts – but, for the most part, they remained cut off from the outside world.

The economy, already crippled, worsened. With Israel refusing to open Gaza’s borders to goods, small Palestinian factories that had once sub-contracted with larger Israeli firms were forced to close. And this summer, tens of millions of dollars of Palestinian produce rotted at the check points because Israel refused to allow them to be exported.

Watching Gaza: ‘The Genovese Syndrome’ « Bir Münzevînin Notlarından…

You need to catch up.

Dummy, are you mentally impaired or just stupid?

You're just cutting sand pasting others' incorrect views, dummy.

Dummy, neither the West Bank nor Gaza are sovereign Arab territory and, thus, cannot be occupied.

Dummy, neither the PLO nor Hamas are signatories to Conventions governing occupations.

Dummy, both Fatah and Hamas are terrorist organizations in violation of international law.

Dummy, international law established Palestine as the Jewish homeland.

Dummy, when Israel was present in Gaza and the West Bank, both were the fourth fastest-growing economies in the world, with 30% growth in GDP each year for ten years.

That's why Gazans want Israel to return, dummy, when they had prosperous lives...
In one town, Gazans yearn for previous Israeli presence / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

Dummy, you need to become informed on the subject matter. The San Remo Resolution transferred sovereignty over Palestine to Israel and the Palestine Mandate established Palestine as the Jewish homeland. Thus, Pallies are occupying Palestine.

Dummy, you cannot factually refute me.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Dummy, the Pallies looted the greenhouses and had no "produce" to export.

You're such a dummy.

This crisis in Gaza predates Hamas’s victory in 2006. For the first twenty-five years of Israel’s occupation (1967-1993) Gaza was a place of misery. As Sarah Roy brilliantly describes in her book, The Gaza Strip: The Political Economy of Re-development, Israel ruthlessly suppressed Gaza’s people, while denying them economic growth opportunities. During this time, no infrastructure (sewers, paved roads, etc.) was built and the population was reduced to, in the words of one Israeli Minister, “hewers of wood, and bearers of water,” i.e., demeaning day labor employment in Israel.

Gaza’s only hope after the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993 was that its economy and infrastructure could be developed and opened up to the outside world. While many in the West blamed Palestinian Authority (PA) mismanagement, the facts point in a different direction. It was the persistence of the occupation from 1994-2005 that resulted in Gaza’s continued stagnation. Despite “peace on paper,” Israel retained an iron grip on Gaza. Settlements remained, as did the physical division of Gaza, north from south and from the rest of Palestinian lands and the outside world. Being denied access and egress meant difficulty in importing and exporting and, therefore, no economic development.

When Israel unilaterally redeployed from Gaza in 2005, the situation deteriorated even further. While Israel was able to project its removal of 7000 settlers as a “painful sacrifice for peace,” by refusing to coordinate their departure with the PA or even to honor the agreement they negotiated with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (that should have guaranteed movement in and out of Gaza), Israel left behind disarray and an angry and impoverished population. By tightening their external controls on the tiny strip, Israel, in effect, created one of the world’s largest prison camps. Inside Gaza, Palestinians were “free,” troubled only by their own poverty and armed gangs. Like prisoners, they could have occasional visitors and receive gifts – but, for the most part, they remained cut off from the outside world.

The economy, already crippled, worsened. With Israel refusing to open Gaza’s borders to goods, small Palestinian factories that had once sub-contracted with larger Israeli firms were forced to close. And this summer, tens of millions of dollars of Palestinian produce rotted at the check points because Israel refused to allow them to be exported.

Watching Gaza: ‘The Genovese Syndrome’ « Bir Münzevînin Notlarından…

You need to catch up.

Dummy, are you mentally impaired or just stupid?

You're just cutting sand pasting others' incorrect views, dummy.

Dummy, neither the West Bank nor Gaza are sovereign Arab territory and, thus, cannot be occupied.

Dummy, neither the PLO nor Hamas are signatories to Conventions governing occupations.

Dummy, both Fatah and Hamas are terrorist organizations in violation of international law.

Dummy, international law established Palestine as the Jewish homeland.

Dummy, when Israel was present in Gaza and the West Bank, both were the fourth fastest-growing economies in the world, with 30% growth in GDP each year for ten years.

That's why Gazans want Israel to return, dummy, when they had prosperous lives...
In one town, Gazans yearn for previous Israeli presence / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

Dummy, you need to become informed on the subject matter. The San Remo Resolution transferred sovereignty over Palestine to Israel and the Palestine Mandate established Palestine as the Jewish homeland. Thus, Pallies are occupying Palestine.

Dummy, you cannot factually refute me.

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

Where does it mention "Jewish State?" Why no mention of sovereignty? What happened to "it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"?

Just asking.

 

[Marc39]

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

Where does it mention "Jewish State?" Why no mention of sovereignty? What happened to "it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"?

Just asking.

Dummy, the Ottoman Turks surrendered sovereignty over Palestine to the World War I Allies in signing the Treaty of Sevres.

The WW I Allies transferred sovereignty over Palestine to Israel in adopting the legally binding San Remo Resolution...

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people...

Dummy, the San Remo Resolution established statehood for Arabs in Iraq and Syria.

The San Remo Resolution says nothing of Palestinians.

The Palestine Mandate flowing from the San Remo Resolution established the legal and political framework for Palestine as the Jewish homeland and encouraged Jewish settlement throughout the land...

Article 2

The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble, and the development of self-governing institutions, and also for safeguarding the civil and religious rights of all the inhabitants of Palestine, irrespective of race and religion.

Article 4

An appropriate Jewish agency shall be recognised as a public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine in such economic, social and other matters as may affect the establishment of the Jewish national home and the interests of the Jewish population in Palestine, and, subject always to the control of the Administration to assist and take part in the development of the country.

Article 5

The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.

Article 6

The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.

Dummy, Lord Balfour, author of the Balfour Declaration upon which the San Remo Resolution and Palestine Mandate are based, has stated his vision of an eventual Jewish state in Palestine.

British Prime Minister David Lloyd George has stated his vision of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Winston Churchill has stated his vision of a Jewish state in Palestine.

And, US President Woodrow Wilson has stated his vision of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Dummy, you know nothing of the subject matter. I just demolished you.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

Where does it mention "Jewish State?" Why no mention of sovereignty? What happened to "it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine,"?

Just asking.

Dummy, the Ottoman Turks surrendered sovereignty over Palestine to the World War I Allies in signing the Treaty of Sevres.

The WW I Allies transferred sovereignty over Palestine to Israel in adopting the legally binding San Remo Resolution...

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 8, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people...

Dummy, the San Remo Resolution established statehood for Arabs in Iraq and Syria.

The San Remo Resolution says nothing of Palestinians.

The Palestine Mandate flowing from the San Remo Resolution established the legal and political framework for Palestine as the Jewish homeland and encouraged Jewish settlement throughout the land...

Article 2


Article 4


Article 5

The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.

Article 6

The Administration of Palestine, while ensuring that the rights and position of other sections of the population are not prejudiced, shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land, including State lands and waste lands not required for public purposes.

Dummy, Lord Balfour, author of the Balfour Declaration upon which the San Remo Resolution and Palestine Mandate are based, has stated his vision of an eventual Jewish state in Palestine.

British Prime Minister David Lloyd George has stated his vision of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Winston Churchill has stated his vision of a Jewish state in Palestine.

And, US President Woodrow Wilson has stated his vision of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Dummy, you know nothing of the subject matter. I just demolished you.

How does UN resolution 181 fit in here?

 

[Marc39]

[How does UN resolution 181 fit in here?

Dummy, 181 was obliterated by the Arabs when they attacked Israel the day after issuance of the resolution.

You know nothing, dummy.

 

[P F Tinmore]

[How does UN resolution 181 fit in here?

Dummy, 181 was obliterated by the Arabs when they attacked Israel the day after issuance of the resolution.

You know nothing, dummy.

You always miss the point. If Israel already had full sovereignty over Palestine, why the partition?

 

[Marc39]

You always miss the point. If Israel already had full sovereignty over Palestine, why the partition?

You never make an intelligent point, dummy.

The Zionists were so grateful for UN recognition, they were not about to argue for Palestine in its entirety for fear of losing it all.

Zionists even entertained the offer of 20% of Palestine when offered by the British in 1937.

Now, you know, dummy.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You always miss the point. If Israel already had full sovereignty over Palestine, why the partition?

You never make an intelligent point, dummy.

The Zionists were so grateful for UN recognition, they were not about to argue for Palestine in its entirety for fear of losing it all.

Zionists even entertained the offer of 20% of Palestine when offered by the British in 1937.

Now, you know, dummy.

According to you, they already had it all since 1922.

What happened?????