While Democrats have serious disagreements with Republicans over political philosophy and policies, most Republicans are appalled at the apparent character flaws of many Democratic candidates. Setting aside the specious claim of a vast right-wing conspiracy, is anyone proud of the way the Clinton and Obama administrations have conducted themselves? Even the supportive mainstream media has felt obligated to report on their almost daily examples of ethical omissions and concealment.
On the Republican side, Nixon's transgressions of 40 years ago seem like child's play in comparison. Even Reagan's "Iran-Contra Scandal" contained no hint of personal or political gain. Except for a few vague references to his "Texas oil buddies" and Halliburton, most of GW's criticism stemmed from his policies rather than his character.
Is nominating someone who is not so ethically challenged too much to ask?
On the Republican side, Nixon's transgressions of 40 years ago seem like child's play in comparison. Even Reagan's "Iran-Contra Scandal" contained no hint of personal or political gain. Except for a few vague references to his "Texas oil buddies" and Halliburton, most of GW's criticism stemmed from his policies rather than his character.
Is nominating someone who is not so ethically challenged too much to ask?