jillian
Princess
- Thread starter
- #121
Thank you for the reminder. I have edited my post. Nobody said the constitution can be edited without the amendment process, but the constitution does say the supreme court would interpret it's meaning.
When you make things up out of thin air, you are not interpreting, you are editing, and if not de jure editing, it is de facto editing.
And yet, the constitutional experts don't agree with you.
PROGRESSIVE constitutional "experts" don't agree with me. That is their opinion, and it is just that, an opinion.
I guess your opinion just doesn't count as much as theirs. Get over it.
That doesn't bother me in the slightest. They are still wrong.
with all due respect, your assessment has no basis other than your own opinion since you don't like rulings that protect the rights of others.