It just dawned on me that the OP is spam.
That may or may not be the case. Links are permitted in the Signature Line. That is His Book. He is not selling it. It is free.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It just dawned on me that the OP is spam.
When we learn to separate what we know, from what we think we know, Totally.
If one is not a literalist about the bible, science and faith are not necessarily inconsistent.
They've been doing so for years.
But I'm still not going to buy the opening poster's book.
wow... you really are denseThe question isn't whether they mix, but whether they can coexist.
So long as each remembers its limitations and doesn't try to speak on that which it cannot speak on, there is no problem.
See, for instance, Mr Mendel and his peas. A fine example of faith and sciences in their proper roles and places coexisting just fine, neither overstepping its bounds.
Co-exist how?
As different methods to interpret the world around us in the same places of education?
No..they cannot.
Schools are schools.
Places of worship..are places of worship.
They should be kept separate. And it's mandated by our Constitution that they are..
Over time they can.
The only religion left that still kills scientists for blasphemy is Islam.
Christians still do plenty of grandstanding, but deep down they know that religion has been relegated to being science's bitch.
No. Never.
Religion deals in superstition and faith.
Science deals in observation of the natural world.
The two simply do not mix.
So you shouldn't eat where you shit or shit where you eat. Only you would interpret that to mean that you could only do one or the other, but not both.
Seriously Sallow.... Has anyone ever told you that You are too Fundamental in your thinking.
Given enough time and patience, people can generally be saved from their own misconceptions.
You better hope so.
Over time they can.
The only religion left that still kills scientists for blasphemy is Islam.
Christians still do plenty of grandstanding, but deep down they know that religion has been relegated to being science's bitch.
Another wingnut who has to lie in order to defend Christianity
George Tiller - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now I'll wait for the "Christians don't kill as often as those other people" defense
Over time they can.
The only religion left that still kills scientists for blasphemy is Islam.
Christians still do plenty of grandstanding, but deep down they know that religion has been relegated to being science's bitch.
Another wingnut who has to lie in order to defend Christianity
George Tiller - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now I'll wait for the "Christians don't kill as often as those other people" defense
Another retard with comprehension problems that sees my post as a defense of Christianity.
Given enough time and patience, people can generally be saved from their own misconceptions.
You better hope so.
Why do I get the impression that an intervention for you would compare to a Season Finale on "Rescue Me", "Son's Of Anarchy", or "Dexter"?
George Tiller - The exception that proves at least two 'contributors' to this thread are fucking retarded.
Another wingnut who has to lie in order to defend Christianity
George Tiller - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Now I'll wait for the "Christians don't kill as often as those other people" defense
Another retard with comprehension problems that sees my post as a defense of Christianity.
Another wingnut who can't read
I didn't say you HAD defended christianity. I predicted you would defend Christianity
I was wrong about that. Kudos, for being less predictable than the avg wingnut
Another retard with comprehension problems that sees my post as a defense of Christianity.
Another wingnut who can't read
I didn't say you HAD defended christianity. I predicted you would defend Christianity
I was wrong about that. Kudos, for being less predictable than the avg wingnut
Nice save.
Another wingnut who can't read
I didn't say you HAD defended christianity. I predicted you would defend Christianity
I was wrong about that. Kudos, for being less predictable than the avg wingnut
Nice save.
But I bet you still don't have the balls to admit you made up that remark about christians not killing scientists
Nice save.
But I bet you still don't have the balls to admit you made up that remark about christians not killing scientists
Whatever I posted is still there for all to see.
I can't control how retards might misinterpret it.
But I bet you still don't have the balls to admit you made up that remark about christians not killing scientists
Whatever I posted is still there for all to see.
I can't control how retards might misinterpret it.
Looks like I won that bet
I'm not sure he does much thinking.No. Never.
Religion deals in superstition and faith.
Science deals in observation of the natural world.
The two simply do not mix.
So you shouldn't eat where you shit or shit where you eat. Only you would interpret that to mean that you could only do one or the other, but not both.
Seriously Sallow.... Has anyone ever told you that You are too Fundamental in your thinking.
I'm not sure he does much thinking.No. Never.
Religion deals in superstition and faith.
Science deals in observation of the natural world.
The two simply do not mix.
So you shouldn't eat where you shit or shit where you eat. Only you would interpret that to mean that you could only do one or the other, but not both.
Seriously Sallow.... Has anyone ever told you that You are too Fundamental in your thinking.