I don't see how. Here's their "story" today about the President's Mother: Obama 'mama': 15 days from birth to Seattle class Dunham signed up for assignments just 2 weeks out of delivery room Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Obama's mother, was registered for college classes in Seattle only 15 days after reportedly delivering her first-born child in Honolulu, according to school records obtained by WND. How Dunham was able to travel the 2,680 air miles from Honolulu to Seattle only a few days after the birth of her baby at a time when trans-Pacific travel likely was at a speed half of today's jets is not disclosed in the currently available public record concerning President Obama's birth. Nor is there anything on the public record to explain how Dunham managed to find an apartment and relocate with her infant son so she could begin taking university classes within 15 days of the baby's birth. <snip> The transcript clearly documents that Dunham was enrolled at the University of Washington in Seattle for two classes that began on Aug. 19, 1961: Anthropology 100, "Introduction to the Study of Man" and Political Science 201, "Modern Government." Obama 'mama': 15 days from birth to Seattle class Some pretty good slander, huh? Somehow this "story" is relevant to whether or not the Presidnet was born in Hawaii? Or is this just a chance to sling some mud at the President's deceased mother? But then you look at the transcript and note that the two classes they reference ARE listed on the transcript -- but they are listed in a section entitled: "Extension and Correspondence Courses." Surely even the "professional journalists" at WND can understand what a correspondence course is, right? Can anybody here defend this nonsense?