Missouri_Mike
Diamond Member
- Nov 5, 2012
- 25,093
- 16,685
- 1,405
explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
The bigger it gets the more corrupt it gets. Isn’t all that is happening with the government a good argument for why it needs shrunk?
Yes, fired people. I'm sure that could be different for different firings. Trump is setting precedent, politicizing the clearance as he is. You obviously support his efforts.The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
Fired people will consult?
Maybe if Hillary The Hag was POTUS.
We have reached this point? How so?When it gets to the point where individuals are abusing the privilege...
Yes, fired people. I'm sure that could be different for different firings. Trump is setting precedent, politicizing the clearance as he is. You obviously support his efforts.The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
Fired people will consult?
Maybe if Hillary The Hag was POTUS.
Well you are making a mistake.Yes, fired people. I'm sure that could be different for different firings. Trump is setting precedent, politicizing the clearance as he is. You obviously support his efforts.The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
Fired people will consult?
Maybe if Hillary The Hag was POTUS.
Absolutely!!!
We have reached this point? How so?When it gets to the point where individuals are abusing the privilege...
Well you are making a mistake.Yes, fired people. I'm sure that could be different for different firings. Trump is setting precedent, politicizing the clearance as he is. You obviously support his efforts.The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
Fired people will consult?
Maybe if Hillary The Hag was POTUS.
Absolutely!!!
Yes we could, if you would explain the abuse of which you speak.Well, we could discuss Comey, Mueller, Brennan or a few others.
Yes, fired people. I'm sure that could be different for different firings. Trump is setting precedent, politicizing the clearance as he is. You obviously support his efforts.The idea is that they have a lot of knowledge and experience, and it is desirable that they have the clearance required to consult on national security issues.explain to me why I should give a crap about retired or fired people keeping a security clearance? What do I gain from that?
Fired people will consult?
Maybe if Hillary The Hag was POTUS.
Absolutely. A simple firing from the top position is not to say they are not fit to consult.Especially when you consider why they were fired and by whom. Certainly no company or rational person not drowned in the hooch that is trump cultism would believe it makes them unfit to consult. .So they were fired and we will bring them back into consult?
john brennan lied under oath - Bing videoYes we could, if you would explain the abuse of which you speak.Well, we could discuss Comey, Mueller, Brennan or a few others.
Every American has the green light to spew opinions.
And you are going to tell me that this is why he was fired? You can't really believe that. And none of that represents abuse of a security clearance, anyway. So you are way off target, all of a sudden.john brennan lied under oath - Bing videoYes we could, if you would explain the abuse of which you speak.Well, we could discuss Comey, Mueller, Brennan or a few others.
Every American has the green light to spew opinions.
CIA director John Brennan lied to you and to the Senate. Fire him | Trevor Timm