Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ROFLMNAO...
Just shut up and DO IT ALREADY... Enough of the talk... enough of your collective cryin' about 'war-crimes' committed against the enemies of the United States... Enough of the implicit little threats... GET ON WITH PROVING YOURSELF FOR WHAT YOU ARE, IN FINALITY... so you can finally be held accountable for it.
I AM BEGGING YA!
Yadda, yadda.
Do it witless... CHARGE AWAY!
Now I wonder why they won't do it?
Care to take a guess dumbass?
Because those who would charge the Bush administration with war crimes would be IDENTIFYING THEMSELVES AS ADVOCATES FOR THE INTERESTS OF TERRORISTS!
And while you feel very stronglly that 'most people' agree with you... those who you are following aren't as stupid as you are... they damn well know that if they tried, they'd be impeached or otherwise run out of office, shortly thereafter; and they're not prepared to toss the good life, just to appease the idiots that put them there.
So... by all means PUHLEASE... JUST DO IT or shut the fuck up...
Duh!
They were in charge.
Ergo, they are responsible for what happened on their watch.
I don't much care if they ordered these crimes, or they merely weren't competent enough to prevent them, they are responsible because they were in charge.
I'm a old time kinda guy in that respect.
The captian of the ship is ultimately responsible for his crew's actions and the well being of the ship under his command.
1) That only goes so far, and you know it. While it is always lip service when we hear this, those in upper echelons are not always ultimately responsible for the actions of those below or for preventing all of said actions. There is a little thing called free will and personal choice which are not totally controllable.
2) And it is the MAJOR key here if they did order these 'crimes'. And there is no evidence whatsoever that any criminal order was ever issued. To 'not care' or to simply ignore this in an attempt to yet again 'stick it' to this administration, is simply laughable.
The difference, silence, is that the crime of perjury by Clinton, was clearly committed and there was direct evidence of this. There is no charge and no evidence of any crime being committed by Bush... rhetoric is not evidence..
As for higher ups not knowing.. ask any platoon sgt or company commander on how things go on without knowledge.. and those are FIRST LINE in the chain... get real silence
My, my, excited now, aren't we. You sound kind of like Stevens, Craig, or Cunningham.
"He is a former drunk, was a serial failure in business who had to repeatedly be bailed out by daddy's friends and wanna-be-friends, was unable to speak articulately despite the finest education(s) that money and influence can buy, has a dislike of reading, so that 100-page memos have to be boiled down to one page for him, is heedless of facts and evidence, and appears not even to know the meaning of truth," said Velvel.
In a published document entitled "The Long Term View" (PDF link), Vevel argues, at the very least, "there is no question" George W. Bush is guilty of conspiracy to commit torture, a war crime.
"He is a former drunk, was a serial failure in business who had to repeatedly be bailed out by daddy's friends and wanna-be-friends, was unable to speak articulately despite the finest education(s) that money and influence can buy, has a dislike of reading, so that 100-page memos have to be boiled down to one page for him, is heedless of facts and evidence, and appears not even to know the meaning of truth," said Velvel.