Brunson VS. Adams.

:flameth:
:Boom2:

Juan O Savin 2/17/23 [bad audio] [live "on stage" recording] [see text]​



2:20
You probably have heard most of you here, about the Brunson case.

2:54
September 12th, 2018 President Trump signed an executive order, that required, that in all future elections, there would be an investigation prior to, and during the election cycle for any federal election, with all the federal positions.



And that within 45 days after the election, the Director of National Intelligence would provide a report, to the world, to the country, to the President, to the agency heads, concerning any indications of foreign interference, within 45 days.

Now what kind of investigation was to be done? Was an investigation, using the department of homeland security, and the seventeen intelligence agencies, that it encompasses. People like CIA, FBI, NSA, DEA, IRS, CISPA Cyber Intelligence Security, NRO National Reconnaissance Office that runs all the satellites, and then the Director of National Intelligence which is the seventeenth agency, Office of Director of Intelligence Director Radcliff at the time. He’s kind of the manager of the three-ring circus of those seventeen agencies, to gather all that intelligence, so he had a job.

And that job was to take that information and compile it into a report, within 45 days of the election, and present it to the President and various other agency heads. Three days before that report was due, on December 15th he did some medair reviews and he said, yes, China interfered in the election. But no, I’m not going to have a report to present in the next three days, most likely, because some of the agency heads were not providing the information.
What?

They weren’t going to provide the intelligence information about whether there was foreign interference in the election.

WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!?!?

In a military command situation, that is disobeying a direct order, the executive order was a direct order, YOU WILL do an investigation and YOU WILL, provide it to the President and various agency heads.

When they did not do that, it’s called insubordination. People get court-martialed over that.

[section omitted]

6:54
DO THEY, HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT, TO DENY THE INFORMATION FROM THE LARGEST INTELEGEENCY GATHERING MACHINE EVER CREATED ON PLANET EARTH, FROM BEING PROVIDED TO THE PRESIDENT AND THE VARIOUS AGENCY HEADS? DO THEY HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT, TO DENY THE INFORMATION OF ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY A FOREIGN COUNTRY?
NOT ON YOUR LIFE!


[section omitted]

17:51
America is under attack and it’s the money that’s the last phase.

The money that came in through Switzerland on mirrored accounts in UBS Bank that bought our election system.

That’s what you’re going to find out over the next many months in congress what were they blocking Chinese MONEY! bought your election system, at fifty different levels… all that money coming in from those foreign accounts through fifty, sixty, seventy different mechanisms and primarily the mechanism that owns the voting machines which is what you’re going to find out about, in these congressional hearings.

Our election system was bought top to bottom, with Chinese money, through accounts, mostly through Switzerland, but through Indonesia and other locations drug money etcetera to control, the magic act of who you looked like you might have voted and what Director Radcliff would have told, the president and the various agency heads, is that China bought the election. And those people that blocked that information, through their insubordination, blocked that information from going to congress going to congress.

Congress voted to certify an election knowing full well that there was information that the election was overturned by China money.

[section omitted]

All those agency heads who refused, in violation of their oaths, refused to provide the intelligence about Chines interference, and all those people that voted to certify an election in congress without first finding out what the facts were and not requiring those agency heads to come in and GIVE US THE INFORMATION!

SHOW US WHAT HAPPENED!!!
YOU DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT, TO DENY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, INFORMATION THAT PAID FOR!
AND YOU DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT, TO BE INSIBORDINATE TO THE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!
[whistles, cheers, and clapping]





View attachment 758201View attachment 758202
View attachment 758200
5NeMi7.jpg

3n9R57.jpg


View attachment 758199




:whipg:



1676759895504.png
 
Last edited:
The only excuse for not investigating is because there was fraud and they knew it. If it was investigated it would be over. Now it will never be over. Thank your Congress for that.
 
September 12th, 2018 President Trump signed an executive order, that required, that in all future elections, there would be an investigation prior to, and during the election cycle for any federal election, with all the federal positions.
And that within 45 days after the election, the Director of National Intelligence would provide a report, to the world, to the country, to the President, to the agency heads, concerning any indications of foreign interference, within 45 days.


Now what kind of investigation was to be done? Was an investigation, using the department of homeland security, and the seventeen intelligence agencies, that it encompasses. People like CIA, FBI, NSA, DEA, IRS, CISPA Cyber Intelligence Security, NRO National Reconnaissance Office that runs all the satellites, and then the Director of National Intelligence which is the seventeenth agency, Office of Director of Intelligence Director Radcliff at the time. He’s kind of the manager of the three-ring circus of those seventeen agencies, to gather all that intelligence, so he had a job.

And that job was to take that information and compile it into a report, within 45 days of the election, and present it to the President and various other agency heads. Three days before that report was due, on December 15th he did some medair reviews and he said, yes, China interfered in the election. But no, I’m not going to have a report to present in the next three days, most likely, because some of the agency heads were not providing the information.
What?

They weren’t going to provide the intelligence information about whether there was foreign interference in the election.

what you’re going to find out over the next many months in congress what were they blocking Chinese MONEY! bought your election system, at fifty different levels… all that money coming in from those foreign accounts through fifty, sixty, seventy different mechanisms and primarily the mechanism that owns the voting machines which is what you’re going to find out about, in these congressional hearings.

Our election system was bought top to bottom, with Chinese money, through accounts, mostly through Switzerland, but through Indonesia and other locations drug money etcetera to control, the magic act of who you looked like you might have voted and what Director Radcliff would have told, the president and the various agency heads, is that China bought the election. And those people that blocked that information, through their insubordination, blocked that information from going to congress going to congress.

OLD [USA Watchdog] NEWS, SUPPORTING Juan O Savin's QUOTED ABOVE!!!



Treason — Death by Hanging

Screenshot 2023-02-19 171751.jpg

DIGITAL SOLDIERS
🐧

DEEP STATE
🦈


EYEDROPMEDIA
Gene Decode Thx
Who is Q - There is no "QANON"








:th_BlackHelicopter:









Screenshot 2023-02-19 155544.jpg
 
Last edited:
OK so in review...
popcorn.gif



The Military knows and "has it all" since 1999 evidence of election interference.

Multiple - Executive Orders are at play.

Emergencies have been Presidentially declared [and largely ignored by congress].

Congress threatens to pack the U.S. Supreme Court [with leftist judges].

Brunson v. Adams No. 22-380 Supreme Court Judges alerted to Acts of Treason via the filing of this petition.

If the Supreme Court Judges ruled in favor of the petition, it would dissolve the Biden Administration and 2/3 of Congress.

Nobody is claiming that the U.S. Supreme Court does not have the POWER and authority to dissolve the Biden Administration and all of Congress.

If the Supreme Court Justices don't rule in favor of the petition then Congress may pack the court and those Supreme Court members, too, could be considered part of that Treason and therefore would be subject to the resultant penalty for Treason - Military Death by Hanging.

MILITARY STING OPERATION

So, then, this case ruling should be a no-brainer for any sain well-educated judicial person, restricted under the binding Constitutional oath of this American republic, of states.
So it's kind of like TO EACH JUSTICE... [militarily] "GO AHEAD PUNK MAKE MY DAY"!!!

WWG1WGA











Dormiunt aliquand leges, nunquam moriuniur.
Laws sometimes sleep but never die.
Nihil tam propriaum imperio quam legibus vivere.
Nothing is so becoming to authority as to live according to the law.

U.S. Constitution IS THE LAW of the land period.
(citing: the tenth amendment "The powers are reserved to the people!")


Who is packing what? Lol
Come and get it, China, I dare ya...

[deep state cabal go boom]
1f4a3.png
 
Last edited:
OVEREXPOSURE, I THINK NOT we have been stuck at 5K for weeks, that's not very educational... can't be good for the advertisers ~ eh.
ATTEMPTING TO "PUMP IT UP" let us see what the clerk of the court says [posting], nothing yet as of this timestamp.
:popcorn:




[giggles] [laughing] 🤣😂😁

Doc1 (2).jpg


I have been talking about this kind of unequal justice for quite a while. And what the law says we should do about it. It is a shame the law no longer means shit.

Total. Media. Blackout. This should come as little surprise for mainstream media outlets not covering the potentially seismic, landmark petition set in front of the nine Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”). But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain...
 
Last edited:
It appears to me that SCOTUS is just as treasonous as the other 2 branches of government.

If they were patriots, they would have not dismissed the case. I hope I am proved wrong and they grant certiori and then take the appropriate action.
 




The Supreme Court has finally agreed to make a Ruling on the Brunson Case – that could dissolve the Biden Administration and all of Congress:
After the Supreme Court’s second denial to hear the Brunson case which dealt with Congress’ failure to investigate possible Fraud in the 2020 Election, SCOTUS received Notice that they could have committed Misprision.
Misprision occurs if Judges are aware of Treasonous Events (such as Congress’ failure to investigate possible Fraud in the 2020 Election) and don’t do anything about it, they could be guilty of being in on that Treason.
Evidently in the past seven days the US Military became involved in that charge of Misprision, visited the Supreme Court and suddenly SCOTUS finally accepted the Brunson case in a 5-4 decision to not only hear it, but would make a ruling on the merits of the case, not the posturing of it.







334985170_127749663390205_8263384977975989488_n.jpg

333386671_537186225149532_611615418626405617_n.jpg


 
Last edited:



You're still clinging to this nonsense?

It was looked at by the Supreme Court because they paid the $300 filing fee. It was reviewed again because they filed ANOTHER $300 filing fee.

You can submit a tacobell reciept...and if you'll pay the $300 filing fee, the Supreme Court will review and reject that too.
 
You're still clinging to this nonsense?

It was looked at by the Supreme Court because they paid the $300 filing fee. It was reviewed again because they filed ANOTHER $300 filing fee.

You can submit a tacobell reciept...and if you'll pay the $300 filing fee, the Supreme Court will review and reject that too.
It is not nonsense. That election should have been investigated by Congress. !47 members wanted it. They were representing Trump voters. There is no excuse except they knew the fraud would be exposed if they did. For that they should pay.
 
It is not nonsense. That election should have been investigated by Congress. !47 members wanted it. They were representing Trump voters. There is no excuse except they knew the fraud would be exposed if they did. For that they should pay.

It is absolutely nonsense. Which is why the courts have summarily rejected it not once, but twice.

You and your ilk feebly cling to this suit because you *want* your conspiracy accusations to be true. Alas, the courts deal in facts and evidence. Not merely accusations.

Which is why Brunson v. Adams is, and always has been, pseudo-legal nonsense.
 
It is absolutely nonsense. Which is why the courts have summarily rejected it not once, but twice.

You and your ilk feebly cling to this suit because you *want* your conspiracy accusations to be true. Alas, the courts deal in facts and evidence. Not merely accusations.

Which is why Brunson v. Adams is, and always has been, pseudo-legal nonsense.
If you believe there was no fraud what would having an investigation do to change that? There was no excuse.
 
If you believe there was no fraud what would having an investigation do to change that? There was no excuse.

What's the point of an investigation when you ignore any outcome that doesn't affirm your conspiracy?

Your insistance that anything that doesn't ape your conspiracy is part of your conspiracy....is why your demands are pointless.
 
What's the point of an investigation when you ignore any outcome that doesn't affirm your conspiracy?

Your insistance that anything that doesn't ape your conspiracy is part of your conspiracy....is why your demands are pointless.
It needed to be done before comfirmation. The people in DC were there to get that investigation by Congress. I told you why it did not happen. It shows obvious guilt and not enough time to cover it up. Congress was complicit with the fraud.
 
It needed to be done before comfirmation. The people in DC were there to get that investigation by Congress. I told you why it did not happen. It shows obvious guilt and not enough time to cover it up. Congress was complicit with the fraud.

As your *perfect* record of failure in any court of law demonstrates elegantly......we don't need to do anything.

Your fantasies and sense of entitlement don't obligate anyone to do anything.
 
As your *perfect* record of failure in any court of law demonstrates elegantly......we don't need to do anything.

Your fantasies and sense of entitlement don't obligate anyone to do anything.
When you own the courts you do not lose.
 

Forum List

Back
Top