British General Election Results

Oh dear. None of the tory manifesto will be implemented. Not one thing. And the remainers in the tory camp, that is most of them, will water down brexit till the point it becomes meaningless.
You lose girls !!
Such a terrible manifesto AND a dismal campaign, yet the 'wildly popular" Comrade Corbyn still lost (and didn't even win the popular vote). How did that happen, Tommy. How???
He was coming from a long way back. His MPs were not supporting him and he was being pilloried by the press.

Yet despite that May lost a 20% lead in 3 weeks.

Its over for the tories. They will limp on for a few weeks with their terrorist friends and the next election will see them dumped.

Here is a video of your new friends terrorising little catholic schoolgirls. Enjoy !

Tommy: He [Comrade Corbyn] was coming from a long way back.


More an excuse than an explanation for why he lost ( the third general election in a row), Tommy.
Parties have made far more impressive come backs from far fewer seats many times over before.
Most recently, for example, 2010. The Conservatives had only 210 seats and gained 96 to end up at 306.
Want to try again? :eusa_think:


The Leftists have no perspective about anything.

So let's put this into perspective in relation to previous British General Elections.

The Labour Party with Jeremy Corbyn last Friday gained just 29 seats, this giving them a total of 261 seats.

To put the Labour Party with Jeremy Corbyn's 261 seats into perspective and to illustrate that Jeremy Corbyn is one of the LEAST SUCCESSFUL Labour Party leaders and also to illustrate that Jeremy Corbyn is NOT advancing the Labour Party on ANY level in an Electoral sense, on the contrary even historically disaster results for the Labour Party such as the 1979 Election and the 1951 Election saw Labour leaders who were thrown out of Downing Street James Callaghan (269 seats) and Clement Attlee (295 seats) both perform better than Jeremy Corbyn.

The British General Election of 1979 in which Labour Prime Minister James Callaghan was thrown out.

James Callaghan = 269 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Callaghan = 8 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132439

The British General Election of 1992.

Neil Kinnock = 271 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Kinnock = 10 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132440

The British General Election of 2010.

Gordon Brown = 258 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Corbyn 3 more seats than Brown - LOST.

View attachment 132441

The British General Election of 2015.

Ed Miliband = 232 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Corbyn 29 more seats than Miliband - LOST.

View attachment 132443

The British General Election of 1970.

Harold Wilson = 288 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Wilson 27 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132444

The British General Election of 1959.

Hugh Gaitskell = 258 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Corbyn 3 more seats than Gaitskell - LOST.

View attachment 132446

The British General Election of 1955.

Clement Attlee = 277 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Attlee 16 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132447

The British General Election of 1951 in which Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee was thrown out.

Clement Attlee = 295 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Attlee 34 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132448

Thanks, Lucy. Puts their 29 seats into perspective.
Great to see the black and white pics of our old politicians. Anthony Eden was quite a handsome gentleman :eusa_think:
 
Last edited:
Oh dear. None of the tory manifesto will be implemented. Not one thing. And the remainers in the tory camp, that is most of them, will water down brexit till the point it becomes meaningless.
You lose girls !!
Such a terrible manifesto AND a dismal campaign, yet the 'wildly popular" Comrade Corbyn still lost (and didn't even win the popular vote). How did that happen, Tommy. How???
He was coming from a long way back. His MPs were not supporting him and he was being pilloried by the press.

Yet despite that May lost a 20% lead in 3 weeks.

Its over for the tories. They will limp on for a few weeks with their terrorist friends and the next election will see them dumped.

Here is a video of your new friends terrorising little catholic schoolgirls. Enjoy !

Tommy: He [Comrade Corbyn] was coming from a long way back.


More an excuse than an explanation for why he lost ( the third general election in a row), Tommy.
Parties have made far more impressive come backs from far fewer seats many times over before.
Most recently, for example, 2010. The Conservatives had only 210 seats and gained 96 to end up at 306.
Want to try again? :eusa_think:


The Leftists have no perspective about anything.

So let's put this into perspective in relation to previous British General Elections.

The Labour Party with Jeremy Corbyn last Friday gained just 29 seats, this giving them a total of 261 seats.

To put the Labour Party with Jeremy Corbyn's 261 seats into perspective and to illustrate that Jeremy Corbyn is one of the LEAST SUCCESSFUL Labour Party leaders and also to illustrate that Jeremy Corbyn is NOT advancing the Labour Party on ANY level in an Electoral sense, on the contrary even historically disaster results for the Labour Party such as the 1979 Election and the 1951 Election saw Labour leaders who were thrown out of Downing Street James Callaghan (269 seats) and Clement Attlee (295 seats) both perform better than Jeremy Corbyn.

The British General Election of 1979 in which Labour Prime Minister James Callaghan was thrown out.

James Callaghan = 269 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Callaghan = 8 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132439

The British General Election of 1992.

Neil Kinnock = 271 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Kinnock = 10 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132440

The British General Election of 2010.

Gordon Brown = 258 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Corbyn 3 more seats than Brown - LOST.

View attachment 132441

The British General Election of 2015.

Ed Miliband = 232 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Corbyn 29 more seats than Miliband - LOST.

View attachment 132443

The British General Election of 1970.

Harold Wilson = 288 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Wilson 27 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132444

The British General Election of 1959.

Hugh Gaitskell = 258 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Corbyn 3 more seats than Gaitskell - LOST.

View attachment 132446

The British General Election of 1955.

Clement Attlee = 277 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Attlee 16 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132447

The British General Election of 1951 in which Labour Prime Minister Clement Attlee was thrown out.

Clement Attlee = 295 seats - Jeremy Corbyn = 261 seats - Attlee 34 more seats than Corbyn - LOST.

View attachment 132448

Yes Mrs May did so well that she apologised today to her party and is still in talks with the kneecappers with a view to a deal.
We will now have a brexit that retains the free movement of people and the extremists can go and fuck themselves.
 
[

The Labour Party support is centred in North East England, Greater Manchester, Merseyside, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire, West Midlands, Welsh Valleys and Greater London, as you can see from the below map.

Everywhere else in England voted Conservative.

Scotland with the exception of Glasgow, is SNP, Conservative and Liberal Democrat.

Wales is a combination of Labour in the far North and far South only, Plaid Cymru and Conservative.]

Only 29 seats? At the end of the day, the conservatives were supposed to wipe the floor with Labour. They didn't. Le Pen loses, Cons in trouble. The right is starting to see a back lash and the left are leaving their cynicism behind and starting to vote again...
The Left in general never stopped voting. It's the young who don't bother. But this time they were out in force and Comrade Corbyn was still nearly 60 seats behind - and they didn't win the popular vote either.

They've lost 3 general elections in a row now and 29 seats really isn't much of a comeback at all - look at previous elections and you'll see what real comebacks look like, you don't even have to go back that far.
FT analysis also showed that areas with more people in poor health tended to vote Conservative this time round, Labour - the alleged Guardian of the NHS did not do so well here, suggesting their hackneyed mantra 'the NHS is safe in our hands' isn't even cutting it anymore.

It only seems like a big deal because Comrade Corbyn is a dick and a terrorist supporter who even his own party say couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery.
What everyone forgot was that he is good on the hustings and absolutely great at bribing young naive voters with free stuff - maybe they don't stop to consider that the magic money tree isn't actually real.
But, he still lost - and it wasn't even close considering it became largely a two horse race.
He stopped grammar schools,dementia taxes,selling off the NHS and a hard brexit. He saved the NHS and will ensure that the tories restore our domestic security.

He is a winner and May is dead meat.
What's wrong with grammar schools?
Oh yes, commies want to drag down, and keep, everyone at the lowest common denominator as supplied by the commie leftards who have reduced our education system to indoctrination camps instead of places of learning.
Grammar schools have never been needed more than they are now - and they WILL be back. Viva grammar schools! :)
Never going to happen,never, ever.
 
19149056_10211604820229944_5253559335514466695_n.jpg
 
But May ran a disastrous campaign.

I'd be surprised if she were PM a year from now.
I wouldn't be sorry to see her go, but now is not the time.

Do you think she should see it through?
IDK. I really don't. I guess it depends on how she does from now on, and how Brexit develops. I wish she hadn't replaced her 'advisors' with a remoaner. That doesn't seem like a good move at all.
 
Last edited:
On the other hand, MAYBE this is a good sign:

What May REALLY thinks? Is PM's latest hire to EU exit team PROOF she plans HARD Brexit...
A HARDLINE Brexiteer has been appointed minister at the Brexit department in a shrewd move by the Prime Minister as she continues her Cabinet reshuffle.
By KATIE MANSFIELD
PUBLISHED: 16:26, Tue, Jun 13, 2017 | UPDATED: 20:01, Tue, Jun 13, 2017

Theresa May vows to 'get on with Brexit'

Steve Baker was seen as a key Brexiteer on the backbenchers and was chair of the European Research Group.

In a signal from the Prime Minister that she does not intend to back down on a hard Brexit, she appointed Mr Baker as parliamentary under-secretary of state at the Department for Exiting the EU.

Since last year's vote to leave the EU, Mr Baker has played an influential role in organising a group of eurosceptics within the Conservative Party opposed to any attempt to water down the terms of Britain's departure from the bloc....


What May REALLY thinks? Is PM's latest hire to EU exit team PROOF she plans HARD Brexit...
 
An interesting article on the DUP.

I'm one of the few people who's been allowed an insider look at the DUP – and they're not as bad as you think
While the DUP remains a definitely Protestant political party it is worth mentioning that both the main Nationalist parties in Northern Ireland are de facto Catholic parties, with the SDLP also staunch in its opposition to abortion

...It is also worth noting that the pragmatism of the DUP was evident in the run up to the 2010 and 2015 General Elections – the DUP did not rule out supporting a minority Labour Government in a hung Parliament.
But 2017 is different.

Currently Jeremy Corbyn, John McDonnell and Diane Abbott are political pariahs, seen by the DUP as being past supporters of the IRA, who tried to bomb and shoot Protestants – including the current leader of the party and her father –

into a united Ireland. So this leaves the Conservatives as the only British party they can do business with – for now.

I'm one of the few people who's been allowed an insider look at the DUP – and they're not as bad as you think
 
Last edited:
[

The Labour Party support is centred in North East England, Greater Manchester, Merseyside, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire, West Midlands, Welsh Valleys and Greater London, as you can see from the below map.

Everywhere else in England voted Conservative.

Scotland with the exception of Glasgow, is SNP, Conservative and Liberal Democrat.

Wales is a combination of Labour in the far North and far South only, Plaid Cymru and Conservative.]

Only 29 seats? At the end of the day, the conservatives were supposed to wipe the floor with Labour. They didn't. Le Pen loses, Cons in trouble. The right is starting to see a back lash and the left are leaving their cynicism behind and starting to vote again...
The Left in general never stopped voting. It's the young who don't bother. But this time they were out in force and Comrade Corbyn was still nearly 60 seats behind - and they didn't win the popular vote either.

They've lost 3 general elections in a row now and 29 seats really isn't much of a comeback at all - look at previous elections and you'll see what real comebacks look like, you don't even have to go back that far.
FT analysis also showed that areas with more people in poor health tended to vote Conservative this time round, Labour - the alleged Guardian of the NHS did not do so well here, suggesting their hackneyed mantra 'the NHS is safe in our hands' isn't even cutting it anymore.

It only seems like a big deal because Comrade Corbyn is a dick and a terrorist supporter who even his own party say couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery.
What everyone forgot was that he is good on the hustings and absolutely great at bribing young naive voters with free stuff - maybe they don't stop to consider that the magic money tree isn't actually real.
But, he still lost - and it wasn't even close considering it became largely a two horse race.
He stopped grammar schools,dementia taxes,selling off the NHS and a hard brexit. He saved the NHS and will ensure that the tories restore our domestic security.

He is a winner and May is dead meat.
What's wrong with grammar schools?
Oh yes, commies want to drag down, and keep, everyone at the lowest common denominator as supplied by the commie leftards who have reduced our education system to indoctrination camps instead of places of learning.
Grammar schools have never been needed more than they are now - and they WILL be back. Viva grammar schools! :)
Never going to happen,never, ever.
I hope your prediction here is as accurate as they usually are :beer:
 
If the Conservatives ally with DUP, it's the end of UK Government neutrality with respect to Northern Ireland. And, it probably will mean a return to direct British rule of NI and a return to the troubles. DUP are certainly happy that the Protestants will be back in control, but the Catholics will resist and probably violently.
 
If the Conservatives ally with DUP, it's the end of UK Government neutrality with respect to Northern Ireland. And, it probably will mean a return to direct British rule of NI and a return to the troubles. DUP are certainly happy that the Protestants will be back in control, but the Catholics will resist and probably violently.
Yes. This is the biggest problem with this whole situation. But what do you suggest the Conservatives do?
 
Put
If the Conservatives ally with DUP, it's the end of UK Government neutrality with respect to Northern Ireland. And, it probably will mean a return to direct British rule of NI and a return to the troubles. DUP are certainly happy that the Protestants will be back in control, but the Catholics will resist and probably violently.
Yes. This is the biggest problem with this whole situation. But what do you suggest the Conservatives do?
Put the country first by not inflaming a delicate situation ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top