Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
isn't it funny that the democrats were the first to accuse the russians? It's because it was their rouge. well duh, why wouldn't they know something about nothing if nothing actually exists. So the dems now know nothing. it's too funny for me. I'm cracking up. they are all fked up today.So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
So you have no proof then that Rice leaked the names.And your proof Rice gave such names to The NY Times, is ....?So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
Revealing the identity to the NY Times is a felony
How do we know that Susan Rice is an actual person?
Thanks for playin'.
Which confirms what I said... you don't know that Rice leaked any names.So you have no proof then that Rice leaked the names.And your proof Rice gave such names to The NY Times, is ....?So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
Revealing the identity to the NY Times is a felony
How do we know that Susan Rice is an actual person?
Thanks for playin'.
We'll only know that after the sooner of: i) the results of the Congressional inquiry, or ii) Rice's stay at Gitmo
Name the leaker, dumbass.
LOL!!!!!
Prove RUSSIA gave the "hacks" to Wiki... dumbass.
You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
Spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
And most likely, Obama gave her the authority to do it! The shit has hit the fan!
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/report-obama-nsa-advisor-susan-rice-requested-unmasking-incoming-trump-officials/
And most likely, Obama gave her the authority to do it! The shit has hit the fan!
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/04/report-obama-nsa-advisor-susan-rice-requested-unmasking-incoming-trump-officials/
You just made the case that the Russians influenced our election, dope
how's that? you mean wikileaks right?Name the leaker, dumbass.
LOL!!!!!
Prove RUSSIA gave the "hacks" to Wiki... dumbass.
You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
Spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
You just made the case that the Russians influenced our election, dope.
So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It was totally illegal. And now we have a direct line to your hero, obummer.
How is it illegal if she requested it through the appropriate process?
Unmasking is illegal in two ways.
1.) "If Surveillance Is Incidental"
This is what Obama's Intelligence heads told us all, after first claiming there was no surveillance at all.
2.) "If No Crimes Have Been Committed"
Flynn was exonerated based on the transcripts of surveillance on him. Therefore a Crime was Committed, but not by him, but by The Obama Administration.
No members of The Trump Team have been accused of any crimes, have had any indictments leveled against them, and even Clapper head of National Intelligence said there is NO EVIDENCE of Russian Collusion.
But what if we forget that 1 & 2 happened?
Was there a crime?
Yes there was! Intelligence regarding Surveillance, and The Transcripts of that Surveillance are by default Classified Information, and cannot be released to The Public unless a specific order is given declassifying the information and justifying the reason for
1.) Declassifying it, and then
2.) Reasons for Releasing it to The Press or Public.
Did that occur? Please show me a document to prove this occurred.
No it did not!
A felony had to be committed to release the Classified Information!
Same as when they released President Trump's Tax Return.
So we have multiple on top of multiple felonies committed just in The Flynn case alone, by Obama and his Regime.
And we haven't even gotten in to the rest of The Trump team and all the classified Intel shared with Clinton or released to The Press. Or the release of transcripts from President Trump's talks with Mexico, Thailand and Australia.
More Felonies Committed there.
I don't think you lefties realize how much trouble your party and the people who were trusted with sensitive information are in.
This is Nixon times 10.
Espionage, Treason, & Sedition were committed by people sitting at the highest levels of government conspiring with a presidential nominee like Hillary Clinton.
This goes all the way to The Top.
Unmasking is not illegal if it is pertinent to an ongoing investigation.
What was being investigated that all of Trump's people had o be unmasked? What criminal activity?
as they say about farts in church, when you fart in church, you sit in your own pew. The stank is on.isn't it funny that the democrats were the first to accuse the russians? It's because it was their rouge. well duh, why wouldn't they know something about nothing if nothing actually exists. So the dems now know nothing. it's too funny for me. I'm cracking up. they are all fked up today.So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
where do you get this lying crud from, SPUTNIK News? The RT News, the KHB part deux, or Putin himself?So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
It was illegal because she gave the info to somebody who released it the press simply to embarass Trump.So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
why? one has to have a crime. So what was the crime? I've been waiting patiently. why can't we hear about the crime for the investigation? how is that classified?It was totally illegal. And now we have a direct line to your hero, obummer.
How is it illegal if she requested it through the appropriate process?
Unmasking is illegal in two ways.
1.) "If Surveillance Is Incidental"
This is what Obama's Intelligence heads told us all, after first claiming there was no surveillance at all.
2.) "If No Crimes Have Been Committed"
Flynn was exonerated based on the transcripts of surveillance on him. Therefore a Crime was Committed, but not by him, but by The Obama Administration.
No members of The Trump Team have been accused of any crimes, have had any indictments leveled against them, and even Clapper head of National Intelligence said there is NO EVIDENCE of Russian Collusion.
But what if we forget that 1 & 2 happened?
Was there a crime?
Yes there was! Intelligence regarding Surveillance, and The Transcripts of that Surveillance are by default Classified Information, and cannot be released to The Public unless a specific order is given declassifying the information and justifying the reason for
1.) Declassifying it, and then
2.) Reasons for Releasing it to The Press or Public.
Did that occur? Please show me a document to prove this occurred.
No it did not!
A felony had to be committed to release the Classified Information!
Same as when they released President Trump's Tax Return.
So we have multiple on top of multiple felonies committed just in The Flynn case alone, by Obama and his Regime.
And we haven't even gotten in to the rest of The Trump team and all the classified Intel shared with Clinton or released to The Press. Or the release of transcripts from President Trump's talks with Mexico, Thailand and Australia.
More Felonies Committed there.
I don't think you lefties realize how much trouble your party and the people who were trusted with sensitive information are in.
This is Nixon times 10.
Espionage, Treason, & Sedition were committed by people sitting at the highest levels of government conspiring with a presidential nominee like Hillary Clinton.
This goes all the way to The Top.
Unmasking is not illegal if it is pertinent to an ongoing investigation.
What was being investigated that all of Trump's people had o be unmasked? What criminal activity?
Trump has been under investigation since July of '16. This is from the transition period.
The same time that the Obama admin was archiving Intel pertaining to Trump people.
how's that? you mean wikileaks right?Name the leaker, dumbass.
LOL!!!!!
Prove RUSSIA gave the "hacks" to Wiki... dumbass.
You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
Spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
You just made the case that the Russians influenced our election, dope.
So what you are saying is that you have the ins with the russians.where do you get this lying crud from, SPUTNIK News? The RT News, the KHB part deux, or Putin himself?So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
It matters not if it was illegal or legal. Your whole party has been caught in lie, after lie after lie.
You can debate that all you want. The fact is, Obama was conducting Surveillance on Donald Trump, and probably other GOP Candidates. I would lay a bet on ALL OF THEM, and was passing the information along to Hillary Clinton.
And that most DEFINATELY IS ILLEGAL, and a Felony, and is Considered Felony Espionage.
You can make a case for Treason and Sedition as well.
I told all of you Leftists, that you were overplaying you hand, and that your Russian Narrative was too outlandish and sensationalist to be true, and that is was nothing but a crafted lie to distract from the corruption of the DNC and served as deflection for a stinging loss.
Now those lies are going to sink you.
Welcome to 2018, where people will not forget all the bullshit you put everyone through the moment you tapped a Criminal Clinton to be your Queen of The Damned.
well sure it is. always has been. In fact, I've been waiting. what is it you got? I want the DNC server inspected by our intelligence, not the Ukraine.how's that? you mean wikileaks right?Name the leaker, dumbass.
LOL!!!!!
Prove RUSSIA gave the "hacks" to Wiki... dumbass.
You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
Spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You hate the HACKS because they exposed the TRUTH about the Dems to the US voters, who then REJECTED THE DEMS.
You just made the case that the Russians influenced our election, dope.
No, dope.
The fact that the Russians were behind the hacks and release is not in dispute. It's the basis of the counter intelligence investigation that includes Trump.
It was illegal because she gave the info to somebody who released it the press simply to embarass Trump.So the unmasking wasn't illegal then?
Q&A on 'unmasking' and leaking classified information
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN UNMASKING AND LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION?
One is legal and the other isn't.
The "unmasking" of Flynn's name is routine, Wittes said. But, he said, sharing Flynn's name publicly "is both shocking and inappropriate."
It is a crime to disclose or "leak" classified information. The contents of intelligence collected under the authorities of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, are classified. Flynn's conversation with Kislyak was collected under these authorities and therefore classified.
IS IT ILLEGAL TO LEAK CLASSIFIED INFORMATION THAT IS INACCURATE?
No.
"If it's not accurate, then it's not classified," Wittes said. "You can't classify stuff that isn't true."
The Trump administration has said reports that Trump associates were in touch with the Kremlin during the campaign are false. Yet the White House has called for leak investigations into the matter.
"You can't say both — that it is a crime to leak and that it is false," Wittes said.
CAN THE PRESIDENT LEAK CLASSIFIED INFORMATION?
No, says Wittes.
"The president can declassify anything he wants," Wittes said. "The mere act of the president saying something is a 'declassification.'"
It was illegal because she gave the info to somebody who released it the press simply to embarass Trump
The fact that the Russians were behind the hacks and release is not in dispute.
