BREAKING: Obama's NSA Advisor Susan Rice Requested The Unmaskings Of Incoming Trump Officials

[Spare_change]

it is no accident that every intelligence agency, and every major Democratic leader, has stated decisively that there was no collusion between the Trump Team and Russia to "cheat to win an election".

It is also no accident that you continually ignore them ---- without that lie, you have nothing to base your irrational hatred of conservatives on.

I have yet to hear any one say that Trump & his campaign did not collude.

You are the only one lying here.

No one has said they physically changed the actual vote. But they did alter the election through misinformation & hacking. They have all said that.

I have problems with you conservatives that are lying fucks.

Man up & tell the truth for a change.

There have been multiple accusations of collusion - yet, no collusion has been proven. In fact, it has been expressly denied by the intelligence agencies and congressional leaders.

Even though all that has happened, leftists continue to insist on more investigations to try to prove something that never happened ---- knowing that, even though nothing happened, the disruption and uproar can interrupt and circumvent the wishes of the voters who elected Trump.

As for your immature name calling, I trust you can do better than that.

The investigation is ongoing. Obviously there are leads yet to be run down. Your line will only take you so far.

Dragging it along doesn't negate the impact of the admission of no collusion by the intelligence agencies.

There's no THERE there.

There's enough there to have three simultaneous independent investigations.

No - there's enough there to have a minority party abuse its responsibility to the American people, and to force unnecessary upheaval and waste of assets.

By what logic does it require THREE "simultaneous independent investigations" to determine what happened? Or, maybe they aren't as "independent" as you suggest?

 

[RealDave]

The high ground? Like the high ground that took us from a balanced budget to the worst recession in 80 years?The high ground that had a Republican President lie to go to war that killed 4600 soldiers?The high ground where the President has admitted to groping women & saying it is OK for those with money to abuse women & them pay them money for their silence.The high ground of cutting funding & regulations that will lead to polluted water, dirtier air, advance of global warming, poisons in our food supply - all in trade for corporate profits?You lost any claim to the "High Ground" when you elected a phony liar, business cheat, woman groping, POS like Donald J Trump. You that voted for him own no high ground at all but bask in Trump's moral swamp.

. You lost the high ground with your support of every immoral thing you leftist have come up with or have tried to justify. The leftist have won the prize for losing the high ground. Now if the void isn't filled with good things or good attentions again, then I'd say that the right has lost the high ground AGAIN. 4600 in Iraq eh ? That's not even a spec when it comes to how many you leftist have KILLED when it comes to the babies who were living in their mothers womb until removed by the abortion monsters.

When life begins is your religious belief, not mine.But hey, keep insisting Abortions is an excuse for Bush to kill 4600 soldiers in a war based on lies.

. No amount of American soldiers dead in 2 or three wars past, can compare to the amount of killings of babies by abortionist doctors in this country. I'm probably being generous with the comparisons in which are to be found within the numbers.

That is the problem. You believe these are babies & that is your belief.I do not believe that life begins at conception & thereby they are not murders.You have a Republican Congress with a Republican President, change it.

. You say at conception, otherwise as if it's when two people got together and had sex ??? No this is after a baby is formed in the womb, and therefore the baby has a heartbeat afterwards, and in this a human being definitely exist. If you kill this human being then you have committed murder. Period.

Here in PA it is 24 weeks.

 

[RealDave]

I have yet to hear any one say that Trump & his campaign did not collude.

You are the only one lying here.

No one has said they physically changed the actual vote. But they did alter the election through misinformation & hacking. They have all said that.

I have problems with you conservatives that are lying fucks.

Man up & tell the truth for a change.

There have been multiple accusations of collusion - yet, no collusion has been proven. In fact, it has been expressly denied by the intelligence agencies and congressional leaders.

Even though all that has happened, leftists continue to insist on more investigations to try to prove something that never happened ---- knowing that, even though nothing happened, the disruption and uproar can interrupt and circumvent the wishes of the voters who elected Trump.

As for your immature name calling, I trust you can do better than that.

The investigation is ongoing. Obviously there are leads yet to be run down. Your line will only take you so far.

Dragging it along doesn't negate the impact of the admission of no collusion by the intelligence agencies.

There's no THERE there.

There's enough there to have three simultaneous independent investigations.

No - there's enough there to have a minority party abuse its responsibility to the American people, and to force unnecessary upheaval and waste of assets.

By what logic does it require THREE "simultaneous independent investigations" to determine what happened? Or, maybe they aren't as "independent" as you suggest?

This from the Benghazi crowd. Hypocrite or just stupid?

 

[westwall]

There have been multiple accusations of collusion - yet, no collusion has been proven. In fact, it has been expressly denied by the intelligence agencies and congressional leaders.

Even though all that has happened, leftists continue to insist on more investigations to try to prove something that never happened ---- knowing that, even though nothing happened, the disruption and uproar can interrupt and circumvent the wishes of the voters who elected Trump.

As for your immature name calling, I trust you can do better than that.

The investigation is ongoing. Obviously there are leads yet to be run down. Your line will only take you so far.

Dragging it along doesn't negate the impact of the admission of no collusion by the intelligence agencies.

There's no THERE there.

There's enough there to have three simultaneous independent investigations.

No - there's enough there to have a minority party abuse its responsibility to the American people, and to force unnecessary upheaval and waste of assets.

By what logic does it require THREE "simultaneous independent investigations" to determine what happened? Or, maybe they aren't as "independent" as you suggest?

This from the Benghazi crowd. Hypocrite or just stupid?

oh, definitely both.

 

[depotoo]

Diane Reynolds being the pseudonym for her daughter Chelsea, the night of the attack

Oh, please. Do you not look for facts or just listen to your party leaders that lie? Emails showed they knew that night it was not a spontaneous attack. Unless you think Rice is just delusional...and that isn't an excuse either.

Susan Rice, the same one that went on all the MSN to blame a video for Stevens Benghazi death, when she knew it was a lie.

The video had created rioting in many Arab cities and was stated as a POSSIBILITY as the investigation continued. There was no lie.

Dayam, you rightards can't learn. Even after 8 GOP-led investigations. At least one of which concluded the information the night of the attack, when Hillary sent an email stating it was an attack, was fluid and kept changing until the intelligence community settled on the video as the catalyst. So there was no lie. When Rice went on TV and blamed the video, it's because that what our IC was telling the White House and State Department. She wasn't lying. They believed that to be the case for 2 weeks until video surveillance of the attack surfaced and revealed it was a terrorist attack.

 

[Faun]

Diane Reynolds being the pseudonym for her daughter Chelsea, the night of the attack

Oh, please. Do you not look for facts or just listen to your party leaders that lie? Emails showed they knew that night it was not a spontaneous attack. Unless you think Rice is just delusional...and that isn't an excuse either.

Susan Rice, the same one that went on all the MSN to blame a video for Stevens Benghazi death, when she knew it was a lie.

The video had created rioting in many Arab cities and was stated as a POSSIBILITY as the investigation continued. There was no lie.

Dayam, you rightards can't learn. Even after 8 GOP-led investigations. At least one of which concluded the information the night of the attack, when Hillary sent an email stating it was an attack, was fluid and kept changing until the intelligence community settled on the video as the catalyst. So there was no lie. When Rice went on TV and blamed the video, it's because that what our IC was telling the White House and State Department. She wasn't lying. They believed that to be the case for 2 weeks until video surveillance of the attack surfaced and revealed it was a terrorist attack.

Idiot.

This has been thoroughly debunked. That email was sent on September 11th while the intel was fluid and still changing. She sent it when the intel was reporting it was a terror attack. Shortly thereafter, intel shifted to the video spurring a protest. 2 weeks later, intel went back to it being a terror attacked.

Hillary did not lie and neither did Rice. They were conveying the findings of our intelligence community.

This was settled long ago. For you to maintain this idiocy reflects on yo being either willfully stupid or an unabashed liar.

Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.

http://intelligence.house.gov/sites/intelligence.house.gov/files/documents/Benghazi Report.pdf​

 

[beagle9]

I don't understand, it just sounds like people doing their job to investigate possible wrong doings.

If there is enough stuff going on that you feel you need to investigate, then you investigate. If you find something going down then you do something about it and you call it a day because it was part of your job. If you don't find something, then fine too... but people shouldn't complain about it because guess what? You were just doing your job.

I take it a lot of the people that are all up in arms about this stuff has never done an investigation in their life.

. Investigation's cost money, and lots of it... If these investigation's were started because the possibility just might ((((MIGHT)))) arise that the leftist agenda would be lost if there wasn't a way to accuse the incoming of something, and this being in hopes to derail the incoming, then look out.... Otherwise if that was the case, and it was all being done for political reasons, (and if it is proven as such), then look out because that is illegal activity in which directly affects the Treasury, and the tax payers dime for nefarious reasons.