Breaking News: Kushner asked Kislyak for 'secret' communications channel with Kremlin

[NYcarbineer]

Trump will eventually have to pardon Kushner, I'm guessing.

 

[Avatar4321]

Btw weren't we being told earlier this week that Russian sources aren't trustworthy?

 

[JimH52]

There is no crime!

In an MSNBC segment hosted by Stephanie Ruhle, legal expert Alan Dershowitz responds to breaking reports that President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner's contacts with Russians are being investigated. Dershowitz explained how even the worst of the worst things the Trump team is being accused of doing vis-a-vis Russia aren't against the law. "Just simply not crimes," he said.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume there was a quid-pro-quo.

Let's assume that the Trump campaign promised: 'If you help us get elected, we'll drop the sanctions.'

How is that different from what President Reagan did with Iran?

President Reagan, the campaign, promised Iran that there would be some quid-pro-quo if Iran didn't hold back and release the hostages after the inauguration of President Reagan.

So, when we start to criminalize things we don't like -- in the absence of federal criminal statue, and I still want to know: Where's the beef?

What is the statue?

None of these things constitute violations of federal criminal law.

www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/26/dershowitz_kushner_meeting_russians_even_politically_coordinating_with_russians_just_not_a_crime.html

If the Comrade coodinated with the Russians on when to release stolen emails, he will go down. He will be the 21st century Benedict Donald. Flynn is giving up the goods, trying to avoud a felony convictiorn.

Remember Impeachment is Political not Criminal.

 

[Sunni Man]

Buy a TV.

TV broke about 7 years ago and never replaced it.

Don't miss it at all. ....

 

[edward37]

Btw weren't we being told earlier this week that Russian sources aren't trustworthy?

They're as trustworthy as they were when SB trump asked them to deliver Hills E mails

 

[JimH52]

Btw weren't we being told earlier this week that Russian sources aren't trustworthy?

They're as trustworthy as they were when SB trump asked them to deliver Hills E mails

How do you know they didn't?

 

[Zander]

What are the sources names?

 

[Lakhota]

Trump will eventually have to pardon Kushner, I'm guessing.

I assume before Trump's impeachment.

 

[Old Rocks]

Russian Ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin.

Kushner Reportedly Asked For Secret Communications Channel With Kremlin - WAPO

That doesn't sound good. Breaking on CNN and MSNBC. Reportedly, even Kislyak was taken aback by such a request.

You mean like a red phone direct line like every president has had since WWII. Kinda crazy with the tech today they discussed something else could work better.

Lines of communication outside of what our intel agencies have access to creates a situation fraught with danger to the nation. We have no reason to trust either the fat senile old orange clown or Kushner.

 

[Sunni Man]

Trump will eventually have to pardon Kushner, I'm guessing.

Pardon him for what?? ....

 

[Seawytch]

 

[edward37]

Btw weren't we being told earlier this week that Russian sources aren't trustworthy?

They're as trustworthy as they were when SB trump asked them to deliver Hills E mails

How do you know they didn't?

They might have Were they real?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

I have a feeling Flynn is cooperating with the FBI and giving up the goods on the very dysfunctional family. The Clown Prince has some splaining to do!

That is a very good assumption. It's all going to come down to money laundering. Trump and his family are a bunch of money launderers

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

There is no crime!

In an MSNBC segment hosted by Stephanie Ruhle, legal expert Alan Dershowitz responds to breaking reports that President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner's contacts with Russians are being investigated. Dershowitz explained how even the worst of the worst things the Trump team is being accused of doing vis-a-vis Russia aren't against the law. "Just simply not crimes," he said.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume there was a quid-pro-quo.

Let's assume that the Trump campaign promised: 'If you help us get elected, we'll drop the sanctions.'

How is that different from what President Reagan did with Iran?

President Reagan, the campaign, promised Iran that there would be some quid-pro-quo if Iran didn't hold back and release the hostages after the inauguration of President Reagan.

So, when we start to criminalize things we don't like -- in the absence of federal criminal statue, and I still want to know: Where's the beef?

What is the statue?

None of these things constitute violations of federal criminal law.

www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/26/dershowitz_kushner_meeting_russians_even_politically_coordinating_with_russians_just_not_a_crime.html

WHY keep it secret ???

. It seems to me they wanted the secure communications because they probably suspected then that Obama was listening to their conversations.

 

[IResist]

It's not a good day to be Kushner, is it?

 

[Seawytch]

Trump will eventually have to pardon Kushner, I'm guessing.

Pardon him for what?? ....

Lying on his security clearance paperwork?

 

[Old Rocks]

There is no crime!

In an MSNBC segment hosted by Stephanie Ruhle, legal expert Alan Dershowitz responds to breaking reports that President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner's contacts with Russians are being investigated. Dershowitz explained how even the worst of the worst things the Trump team is being accused of doing vis-a-vis Russia aren't against the law. "Just simply not crimes," he said.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume there was a quid-pro-quo.

Let's assume that the Trump campaign promised: 'If you help us get elected, we'll drop the sanctions.'

How is that different from what President Reagan did with Iran?

President Reagan, the campaign, promised Iran that there would be some quid-pro-quo if Iran didn't hold back and release the hostages after the inauguration of President Reagan.

So, when we start to criminalize things we don't like -- in the absence of federal criminal statue, and I still want to know: Where's the beef?

What is the statue?

None of these things constitute violations of federal criminal law.

www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/26/dershowitz_kushner_meeting_russians_even_politically_coordinating_with_russians_just_not_a_crime.html

WHY keep it secret ???

. It seems to me they wanted the secure communications because they probably suspected then that Obama was listening to their conversations.

Dumb fuck, if they were talking to the Russians off the record, then President Obama needed the intel agencies to monitor them.

Things are beginning to look real interesting.

 

[Lakhota]

There is no crime!

In an MSNBC segment hosted by Stephanie Ruhle, legal expert Alan Dershowitz responds to breaking reports that President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner's contacts with Russians are being investigated. Dershowitz explained how even the worst of the worst things the Trump team is being accused of doing vis-a-vis Russia aren't against the law. "Just simply not crimes," he said.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume there was a quid-pro-quo.

Let's assume that the Trump campaign promised: 'If you help us get elected, we'll drop the sanctions.'

How is that different from what President Reagan did with Iran?

President Reagan, the campaign, promised Iran that there would be some quid-pro-quo if Iran didn't hold back and release the hostages after the inauguration of President Reagan.

So, when we start to criminalize things we don't like -- in the absence of federal criminal statue, and I still want to know: Where's the beef?

What is the statue?

None of these things constitute violations of federal criminal law.

www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/26/dershowitz_kushner_meeting_russians_even_politically_coordinating_with_russians_just_not_a_crime.html

WHY keep it secret ???

. It seems to me they wanted the secure communications because they probably suspected then that Obama was listening to their conversations.

President Obama WAS listening to the Russians. That's why there is so much recorded evidence.

 

[Sunni Man]

Lying on his security clearance paperwork?

Link? Evidence? .....

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

There is no crime!

In an MSNBC segment hosted by Stephanie Ruhle, legal expert Alan Dershowitz responds to breaking reports that President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner's contacts with Russians are being investigated. Dershowitz explained how even the worst of the worst things the Trump team is being accused of doing vis-a-vis Russia aren't against the law. "Just simply not crimes," he said.

ALAN DERSHOWITZ: Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume the worst case scenario.

Let's assume there was a quid-pro-quo.

Let's assume that the Trump campaign promised: 'If you help us get elected, we'll drop the sanctions.'

How is that different from what President Reagan did with Iran?

President Reagan, the campaign, promised Iran that there would be some quid-pro-quo if Iran didn't hold back and release the hostages after the inauguration of President Reagan.

So, when we start to criminalize things we don't like -- in the absence of federal criminal statue, and I still want to know: Where's the beef?

What is the statue?

None of these things constitute violations of federal criminal law.

www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/05/26/dershowitz_kushner_meeting_russians_even_politically_coordinating_with_russians_just_not_a_crime.html

WHY keep it secret ???

. It seems to me they wanted the secure communications because they probably suspected then that Obama was listening to their conversations.

Dumb fuck, if they were talking to the Russians off the record, then President Obama needed the intel agencies to monitor them.

Things are beginning to look real interesting.

How is any different from the Reagan team establishing back channels to the Iranians when he wasn't president yet?