Breaking News...FAR right wing Supreme Court strikes down Miranda rights 5-4

Bfgrn

Gold Member
Apr 4, 2009
16,829
2,492
245
Do the American people need any MORE evidence right wing America is ANTI-freedom? What NEXT, guilty until proven innocent???

Court: Suspects must say they want to be silent


By JESSE J. HOLLAND (AP) – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that suspects must explicitly tell police they want to be silent to invoke Miranda protections during criminal interrogations, a decision one dissenting justice said turns defendants' rights "upside down."

A right to remain silent and a right to a lawyer are the first of the Miranda rights warnings, which police recite to suspects during arrests and interrogations. But the justices said in a 5-4 decision that suspects must tell police they are going to remain silent to stop an interrogation, just as they must tell police that they want a lawyer.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the court's newest member, wrote a strongly worded dissent for the court's liberals, saying the majority's decision "turns Miranda upside down."

"Criminal suspects must now unambiguously invoke their right to remain silent — which counter-intuitively, requires them to speak," she said. "At the same time, suspects will be legally presumed to have waived their rights even if they have given no clear expression of their intent to do so. Those results, in my view, find no basis in Miranda or our subsequent cases and are inconsistent with the fair-trial principles on which those precedents are grounded."
 
The Founding Fathers fought the British to get their Miranda Warnings! This is a sham and Sonia's wise Latina vagina says so!
 
ZOMG!!!

When the po-leece ask if you understand these rights, you have to answer "yes"

WHAT A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE
 
I'll have to read the decisions before forming a real opinion but I have to say I find this surprising.
 
"The ruling comes in a case where a suspect, Van Chester Thompkins, remained mostly silent for a three-hour police interrogation before implicating himself in a Jan. 10, 2000, murder in Southfield, Mich. He appealed his conviction, saying that he invoked his Miranda right to remain silent by remaining silent."

What have we come to when murderers can no longer kill with impunity?

Bfgrn, it's a sad sad day that this man was convicted by his own admission.
 
I'll have to read the decisions before forming a real opinion but I have to say I find this surprising.

if you're not going to have a knee jerk response, i'm afraid i'll have to have you escorted from the thread.

sorry
:lol:

I almost forgot. :redface: Let me try again:

This sucks! They're destroying our great nation, the un-American terrorist loving activist clowns. Damn those rightwingnut conservatard commie fascist socialist neocon fucktards!! Damn them to HELL!!!!! :evil:

Better?
 
Right wing scumbags won't let murderers walk EVEN AFTER THEY ADMIT TO THE DEED!!!

It's a sad, sad day. I'm especially sad that Van Chester Thompkins can't move next door to Bfrgn.
 

Forum List

Back
Top