Brain Teaser! Kudos if you can solve

Discussion in 'Economy' started by whom, Oct 14, 2008.

1. Offline

whomRookie

Joined:
Oct 14, 2008
Messages:
1
0
Trophy Points:
1
Ratings:
+0
During the course of a year, the labor force consists of the same 1000 people. Of these, 20 lack skills that employers desire and hence remain unemployed throughout the year. At the same time, every month during the year, 30 people become unemployed, and 30 other different people who were unemployed find jobs. There is no seasonal employment.
A) What is the frictional unemployment rate?

B) What is the unemployment rate?

C) Suppose that a system of unemployment compensation is established. Each month, 30 new people continue to become unemployed, but each monthly group of newly unemployed now takes two months to find a job. After this change, what is the frictional unemployment rate?

D) After the change discussed in C, what is the unemployment rate?

2. Offline

Skull PilotDiamond Member

Joined:
Nov 17, 2007
Messages:
42,635
5,749
Trophy Points:
1,830
Ratings:
+16,748
The frictional unemployment rate can be abolished by the liberal application of KY Jelly.

• Thank You! x 1
3. Online

RetiredGySgtDiamond Member

Joined:
May 6, 2007
Messages:
42,523
6,758
Trophy Points:
1,840
Location:
North Carolina
Ratings:
+12,449
Missing something here. If only 20 people are permanently unemployed to start and 30 more are added each month BUT another 30 GET jobs each month.....

4. Offline

Bern80Gold Member

Joined:
Jan 9, 2004
Messages:
8,094
722
Trophy Points:
138
Ratings:
+728
On the face of it at least:

A) 5%

B) 2%

C) 8%

D) 2%

I assume there's a point in our future?

5. Offline

editecMr. Forgot-it-All

Joined:
Jun 5, 2008
Messages:
41,426
5,599
Trophy Points:
48
Location:
Maine
Ratings:
+5,640
Depends.

If the unemployed became so because their jobs were shipped to a nation of slaves, then they're not unemployed, they're just socialist slackers who brought that sorry state upon themselves by demanding a livable wage.

6. Offline

Bern80Gold Member

Joined:
Jan 9, 2004
Messages:
8,094
722
Trophy Points:
138
Ratings:
+728
Wow. I just have to congratulate you on your attempt at making something out of absolutey nothing. The BS to word ratio of this post is quite staggering.

I realize you're just trying to goad me, but since none of that reflects my position in the least and the rest is so convolutedly stupid I suggest you try again. Perhaps with something resembling accuracy and coherence.

Last edited: Oct 15, 2008
7. Online

RetiredGySgtDiamond Member

Joined:
May 6, 2007
Messages:
42,523
6,758
Trophy Points:
1,840
Location:
North Carolina
Ratings:
+12,449
Do I get to add 10 people to the work force total? If not, again, your numbers can not work.

8. Offline

Mr. PresidentBOARD PRESIDENT..carry on

Joined:
Aug 22, 2008
Messages:
1,423
271
Trophy Points:
98
Ratings:
+289
none of the percentages fit

9. Offline

jillianPrincessSupporting Member

Joined:
Apr 4, 2006
Messages:
81,648
14,662
Trophy Points:
2,220
Location:
Ratings:
+31,799
8%

why?

of course, I could be totally wrong..... if math were my thing, I'd have become a doctor, not a lawyer. lol.. but I figured I'd take a shot anyway.

10. Offline

Bern80Gold Member

Joined:
Jan 9, 2004
Messages:
8,094
722
Trophy Points:
138
Ratings:
+728
I'm not saying I'm right. But frictional unemployment is basically anybody between jobs and looking for work. So if it takes two month for people to find work you 30 laid off each month. the mext month thirty more get laid off and the 30 from the previous month still aren't unemply so that's 6% plus the 20 so called unemployable, but I would still call them frictionally unemployed as well so that's 8%. Not a 100% on this but I don't believe frictional umemployment is counted in unemployment.

Last edited: Oct 15, 2008

Title
Replies Views
Last Message

Replies:
139
Views:
680

Replies:
1
Views:
2

Replies:
77
Views:
882

Replies:
27
Views:
28

Replies:
14
Views:
69