Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 14,918
- 12,545
- 2,400
It has come down to libeling/defamation someone twice, it is Dr. Crockford.
Polar Bear Science
Blacklist by Nature follows defamation by BioScience: journals reject ethics of science
August 17,2019
EXCERPT:
Along with hundreds of other people – 385 to be exact – I have been blacklisted [#181] by the science journal Nature Communications in a recently-published abysmal paper by three authors from University of California Merced, after I and a number of others were publicly defamed by a squadron of authors in a similarly-stupid paper less than two years ago in the general interest journal BioScience. This obsession that scientists-with-a-message have about silencing peers with other viewpoints (rather than constructing and communicating a winning argument themselves) is vile and utterly counter to what real science is about. Not surprisingly, they positively fawn over media stars like Al Gore and Greta Thunberg who have no science background but willingly repeat the accepted message of climate-change-doom.
LINK
I bet warmists like forum member Crick, who is on record saying vile words like this:
"Just from a hypothetical viewpoint, it would be a great deal more effective to "off" all the deniers."
Would be overjoyed at blacklisting a group of people he doesn't agree with.
I consider it cowardly and juvenile, which is why warmists are celebrating this leftist inner ugliness. It mirrors their desire to trample over people they don't agree with, as Crick once stated:
"I have no intention of debating facts. A strong consensus exists."
Go look up Dalton Trumbo to see how he suffered under a blacklist.
Polar Bear Science
Blacklist by Nature follows defamation by BioScience: journals reject ethics of science
August 17,2019
EXCERPT:
Along with hundreds of other people – 385 to be exact – I have been blacklisted [#181] by the science journal Nature Communications in a recently-published abysmal paper by three authors from University of California Merced, after I and a number of others were publicly defamed by a squadron of authors in a similarly-stupid paper less than two years ago in the general interest journal BioScience. This obsession that scientists-with-a-message have about silencing peers with other viewpoints (rather than constructing and communicating a winning argument themselves) is vile and utterly counter to what real science is about. Not surprisingly, they positively fawn over media stars like Al Gore and Greta Thunberg who have no science background but willingly repeat the accepted message of climate-change-doom.
LINK
I bet warmists like forum member Crick, who is on record saying vile words like this:
"Just from a hypothetical viewpoint, it would be a great deal more effective to "off" all the deniers."
Would be overjoyed at blacklisting a group of people he doesn't agree with.
I consider it cowardly and juvenile, which is why warmists are celebrating this leftist inner ugliness. It mirrors their desire to trample over people they don't agree with, as Crick once stated:
"I have no intention of debating facts. A strong consensus exists."
Go look up Dalton Trumbo to see how he suffered under a blacklist.