Black Woman Reports White Man For Choking Her Son, Cop Shows Up And Attacks Her

[Picaro]

Bullshit. But do leave out the entire quote; otherwise there is no lie to peddle, right? Right. For those who are really interested in the entire quote he was responding to with "Why not?", try the video at the local news station, Channel 5 here in the DFW area.

Should have just stopped at the part where you admit you don't know squat.

Here is what the woman said, "He can't prove to me that my son littered.

... and he responds with "Why not?" ... no need to respond to the rest of her blathering Dindonuttin garbage. It wasn't relevant to the case.

How is that somehow justified? If a 7 year old drops a paper on your lawn, do you have the right to put him in a choke hold? That's what the woman said happened, and whether it is or not, she clearly seems to believe it. By responding with, "Why not?" the officer is strongly implying that the man accused of putting a 7 year old boy in a choke hold for littering has the right to do so.

there is no evidence he had the kid in a 'choke hold', that's why, and the officer was responding to her first sentence. Just because the she kept on babbling doesn't change anything. Of course maybe you just don't care and prefer the distortion, like Skippy and his intellectual equal Guno do.

WTF are you talking about? He didn't respond after she said the accused man couldn't prove her son littered. He waited until after she made multiple statements, finishing with saying the accused man had no right to put his hands on her son, and you expect someone to believe the officer was only responding to the first sentence?

Even if I were to accept your claim, the officer does nothing to indicate that is what he means. Of course the woman thinks he is asking why the accused man doesn't have a right to put hands on her son, it's the last thing she said before the officer responded!

You appear to be engaging in serious mental gymnastics to try to justify the officer's response based on what's in the video.

Ah, now we know for certain you're an idiot. He answered here after she shut her loud stupid piehole and let him get a word in, dumbass.

And in your world, a person can respond to anything someone else says, no matter when they said it, and the person they are responding to should know just what they are referring to, is that it?

Now you're all butthurt that have you no critical thinking skills. Tough. Go back to a real school and you wouldn't get caught making stupid claims.

 

[Montrovant]

Here is what the woman said, "He can't prove to me that my son littered. But it doesn't matter if he did or didn't. It doesn't give him the right to put his hands on him." The officer responds with, "Why not?"

How is that somehow justified? If a 7 year old drops a paper on your lawn, do you have the right to put him in a choke hold? That's what the woman said happened, and whether it is or not, she clearly seems to believe it. By responding with, "Why not?" the officer is strongly implying that the man accused of putting a 7 year old boy in a choke hold for littering has the right to do so.

The video is pretty choppy, I hope the cop had a camera or mic running if it has been edited.

That said, I don't trust anything libturds post because more often than not it's bullshit.

"Hands up don't shoot" and BLM destroyed any credibility these people have, so of course even their videos are suspect.

The same as NBC doctoring Zimmerman's 911 call in order to promote racial strife.

Keep lying to the public about shit like that. People will get so sick of it they'll watch the wolves eat your dumb asses.

I'm trying to keep an open mind because so many police incidents cause outrage before all the facts come out. Still, the video looks bad.

VIDEO: Fort Worth mom arrested after calling for help

According to that article, the police internal affairs is investigating. The article says that body cam footage will not be released until the investigation is complete, indicating there is body cam footage of the incident.

Also according to that article, the officer never took a report about the choking incident and the man accused of choking the boy was not arrested.

The woman clearly says that her 7 year old son was choked. Whether true or not, I would think the officer should indicate the charge in his report on the incident.

 

[SYTFE]

Full video here: Breaking: Watch A Worthless Texas Pig Assault A Family After They CALLED THEM For Help

 

[ClosedCaption]

Here's the problem....

Parasites like guano are traitors. They're a danger to the republic and should be fertilizing North Korean Rice Farms.

When guano and assholes like him put out a video it's easy to dismiss it, because most of the time they're full of shit and take sides with scumbags. So it's easy to give the cop the benefit of the doubt, because sniveling piece of shit like guano howl when scumbag this like Trayvon and that thug in Ferguson get what's coming to them.

But....this isn't about Guno but nice try at trolling.

Guno posted a thread on it, too, so yeah, it is about all of you parrots and your agendas.

GUNO posted a thread on what? When you answer then you'll know that Guno isn't the topic.

 

[Montrovant]

Here is what the woman said, "He can't prove to me that my son littered.

... and he responds with "Why not?" ... no need to respond to the rest of her blathering Dindonuttin garbage. It wasn't relevant to the case.

How is that somehow justified? If a 7 year old drops a paper on your lawn, do you have the right to put him in a choke hold? That's what the woman said happened, and whether it is or not, she clearly seems to believe it. By responding with, "Why not?" the officer is strongly implying that the man accused of putting a 7 year old boy in a choke hold for littering has the right to do so.

there is no evidence he had the kid in a 'choke hold', that's why, and the officer was responding to her first sentence. Just because the she kept on babbling doesn't change anything. Of course maybe you just don't care and prefer the distortion, like Skippy and his intellectual equal Guno do.

WTF are you talking about? He didn't respond after she said the accused man couldn't prove her son littered. He waited until after she made multiple statements, finishing with saying the accused man had no right to put his hands on her son, and you expect someone to believe the officer was only responding to the first sentence?

Even if I were to accept your claim, the officer does nothing to indicate that is what he means. Of course the woman thinks he is asking why the accused man doesn't have a right to put hands on her son, it's the last thing she said before the officer responded!

You appear to be engaging in serious mental gymnastics to try to justify the officer's response based on what's in the video.

Ah, now we know for certain you're an idiot. He answered here after she shut her loud stupid piehole and let him get a word in, dumbass.

And in your world, a person can respond to anything someone else says, no matter when they said it, and the person they are responding to should know just what they are referring to, is that it?

Now you're all butthurt that have you no critical thinking skills. Tough. Go back to a real school and you wouldn't get caught making stupid claims.

Yep, my critical thinking skills are at fault for not realizing that the officer replying with "Why not?" was actually talking about the first of three sentences the woman just finished speaking. I must need better schooling!

 

[ClosedCaption]

Here is what the woman said, "He can't prove to me that my son littered. But it doesn't matter if he did or didn't. It doesn't give him the right to put his hands on him." The officer responds with, "Why not?"

How is that somehow justified? If a 7 year old drops a paper on your lawn, do you have the right to put him in a choke hold? That's what the woman said happened, and whether it is or not, she clearly seems to believe it. By responding with, "Why not?" the officer is strongly implying that the man accused of putting a 7 year old boy in a choke hold for littering has the right to do so.

The video is pretty choppy, I hope the cop had a camera or mic running if it has been edited.

That said, I don't trust anything libturds post because more often than not it's bullshit.

"Hands up don't shoot" and BLM destroyed any credibility these people have, so of course even their videos are suspect.

The same as NBC doctoring Zimmerman's 911 call in order to promote racial strife.

Keep lying to the public about shit like that. People will get so sick of it they'll watch the wolves eat your dumb asses.

This isn't about liberals...concentrate. it's as if you can't do anything but make up stuff about liberals as a response to everything.

 

[SYTFE]

Here's the problem....

Parasites like guano are traitors. They're a danger to the republic and should be fertilizing North Korean Rice Farms.

When guano and assholes like him put out a video it's easy to dismiss it, because most of the time they're full of shit and take sides with scumbags. So it's easy to give the cop the benefit of the doubt, because sniveling piece of shit like guano howl when scumbag this like Trayvon and that thug in Ferguson get what's coming to them.

But....this isn't about Guno but nice try at trolling.

Guno posted a thread on it, too, so yeah, it is about all of you parrots and your agendas.

GUNO posted a thread on what? When you answer then you'll know that Guno isn't the topic.

He's confuzzled. As I said, Picaro doesn't think clearly when he's got his dildo up his ass. He slurs his words, gets people confused and gets really excited when he sees black people being abused by the police. He's probably already blown his load all over his computer because of this topic. It's like porn to the gimp.

 

[Pete7469]

I'm trying to keep an open mind because so many police incidents cause outrage before all the facts come out. Still, the video looks bad.

VIDEO: Fort Worth mom arrested after calling for help

According to that article, the police internal affairs is investigating. The article says that body cam footage will not be released until the investigation is complete, indicating there is body cam footage of the incident.

Also according to that article, the officer never took a report about the choking incident and the man accused of choking the boy was not arrested.

The woman clearly says that her 7 year old son was choked. Whether true or not, I would think the officer should indicate the charge in his report on the incident.

Without evidence of the assault I'm not sure how an arrest could be made.

I didn't see the kid, or the cop examine him. I didn't hear what the man said.

If he said he didn't do it, even though the people around him say he did, without physical evidence you can't arrest the man on hearsay.

I could get a bunch of people to accuse anyone of anything.

Did the 7 year old get the ass after the old dude reprimanded him and try to kick him, causing the old man to restrain the little bastard? Lets face it, those people did not strike me as the sort who instill respect for adults in their kids. They were enraged from the get go, and a cop acting alone saw no aggression from the man, but the woman and people I assume are family escalated the situation.

Again, the facts will come out, and I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to it than the libturds acknowledge.

There ALWAYS is.

 

[Pete7469]

GUNO posted a thread on what? When you answer then you'll know that Guno isn't the topic.

Guano is a lying piece of shit like you though.

 

[SYTFE]

GUNO posted a thread on what? When you answer then you'll know that Guno isn't the topic.

Guano is a lying piece of shit like you though.

Pete "meat puppet faggot" 7469 chimes in

lol

 

[Pete7469]

This isn't about liberals...concentrate. it's as if you can't do anything but make up stuff about liberals as a response to everything.

BULLSHIT.

This has EVERYTHING to do with you parasites and your lies. It has everything to do with the fact you consistently defend the actions of scumbags and undermine the endeavors of police.

You want the rest of the world to sympathize with ghetto rats who destroy other people's property when verdicts and elections don't go their way?

Fuck you in the throat with a white hot pickle fork.

 

[Pete7469]

You libturds are supposed to be a lot more "creative" than that.

Stealing my own insults. How pathetic. Like Fakey stealing my sig line.

Go suck start a 12 gauge parasites.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm trying to keep an open mind because so many police incidents cause outrage before all the facts come out. Still, the video looks bad.

VIDEO: Fort Worth mom arrested after calling for help

According to that article, the police internal affairs is investigating. The article says that body cam footage will not be released until the investigation is complete, indicating there is body cam footage of the incident.

Also according to that article, the officer never took a report about the choking incident and the man accused of choking the boy was not arrested.

The woman clearly says that her 7 year old son was choked. Whether true or not, I would think the officer should indicate the charge in his report on the incident.

Without evidence of the assault I'm not sure how an arrest could be made.

I didn't see the kid, or the cop examine him. I didn't hear what the man said.

If he said he didn't do it, even though the people around him say he did, without physical evidence you can't arrest the man on hearsay.

I could get a bunch of people to accuse anyone of anything.

Did the 7 year old get the ass after the old dude reprimanded him and try to kick him, causing the old man to restrain the little bastard? Lets face it, those people did not strike me as the sort who instill respect for adults in their kids. They were enraged from the get go, and a cop acting alone saw no aggression from the man, but the woman and people I assume are family escalated the situation.

Again, the facts will come out, and I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to it than the libturds acknowledge.

There ALWAYS is.

When trolling didn't work Pete is now forced to defend choking a 7 year old as being possibly ok. Lol

 

[ClosedCaption]

GUNO posted a thread on what? When you answer then you'll know that Guno isn't the topic.

Guano is a lying piece of shit like you though.

Guno posted on what? When you answer you'll know the topic at hand.

 

[leftwinger]

Nobody chokes a little kid. Im not buying this story. Terrible to use a kid like this? She's "reaching" as they always do. Maybe trying to get a payday?

Dont litter. Dont go physcotic in public.
30 days in the hole for disturbing the peace for all 3 on video. The screamer with phone? 60 days.

Next problem.

 

[Montrovant]

I'm trying to keep an open mind because so many police incidents cause outrage before all the facts come out. Still, the video looks bad.

VIDEO: Fort Worth mom arrested after calling for help

According to that article, the police internal affairs is investigating. The article says that body cam footage will not be released until the investigation is complete, indicating there is body cam footage of the incident.

Also according to that article, the officer never took a report about the choking incident and the man accused of choking the boy was not arrested.

The woman clearly says that her 7 year old son was choked. Whether true or not, I would think the officer should indicate the charge in his report on the incident.

Without evidence of the assault I'm not sure how an arrest could be made.

I didn't see the kid, or the cop examine him. I didn't hear what the man said.

If he said he didn't do it, even though the people around him say he did, without physical evidence you can't arrest the man on hearsay.

I could get a bunch of people to accuse anyone of anything.

Did the 7 year old get the ass after the old dude reprimanded him and try to kick him, causing the old man to restrain the little bastard? Lets face it, those people did not strike me as the sort who instill respect for adults in their kids. They were enraged from the get go, and a cop acting alone saw no aggression from the man, but the woman and people I assume are family escalated the situation.

Again, the facts will come out, and I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to it than the libturds acknowledge.

There ALWAYS is.

I'm not saying the accused guy should have been arrested, just giving some highlights of the article.
I would think that any report on the incident would include the accusation, but apparently that wasn't the case.

Honestly, the facts about what happened with the child are mostly irrelevant to the officer's reaction, unless there is some reason the officer would know those facts. From the information available, it seems that the officer responded to a call from the woman regarding a possible assault on a minor, then somehow turned that into not only a criticism on the woman's parenting but an implication that the accused man has the right to assault her son for littering. Whether the child actually was assaulted doesn't matter to the officer's conduct if the officer didn't know one way or the other.

Did the woman act poorly? Sure, but it didn't seem too egregious to me, particularly if she believed her young son had been assaulted and the officer responding to her call regarding the assault was dismissing it. I think most parents would be infuriated if they believed their 7 year old had been assaulted, and that fury would only be worsened by a police officer brushing the assault off, asking why some man doesn't have the right to assault their child, and instead questioning their own parenting skills.

The officer just seemed to me to be making the situation worse rather than trying to defuse it.

 

[leftwinger]

How do we have road-rage on self-driving Cars?

 

[Pete7469]

I'm not saying the accused guy should have been arrested, just giving some highlights of the article.
I would think that any report on the incident would include the accusation, but apparently that wasn't the case.

Honestly, the facts about what happened with the child are mostly irrelevant to the officer's reaction, unless there is some reason the officer would know those facts. From the information available, it seems that the officer responded to a call from the woman regarding a possible assault on a minor, then somehow turned that into not only a criticism on the woman's parenting but an implication that the accused man has the right to assault her son for littering. Whether the child actually was assaulted doesn't matter to the officer's conduct if the officer didn't know one way or the other.

Did the woman act poorly? Sure, but it didn't seem too egregious to me, particularly if she believed her young son had been assaulted and the officer responding to her call regarding the assault was dismissing it. I think most parents would be infuriated if they believed their 7 year old had been assaulted, and that fury would only be worsened by a police officer brushing the assault off, asking why some man doesn't have the right to assault their child, and instead questioning their own parenting skills.

The officer just seemed to me to be making the situation worse rather than trying to defuse it.

I think our perceptions of the video are the same.

My reasons for caution are the choppy nature of the video and how much of it may have been altered. I don't trust leftists when they thrust stories like this into viral headlines, because the story usually ends with the opposite being the truth.

I do agree that at face value, we see a cop respond to the complaint obtuse about the more egregious crime that was alleged and confrontational towards the complaining party. If that is the case the man has no business being a patrol officer because his judgement is poor.

Police should be members of the community they serve. However I have sheriffs from the most libturd infested county in TX in my neighborhood because they don't want to live in the county that commissioned them.

There's a reason for that, and it really is the crux of the problem.

 

[SYTFE]

I'm not saying the accused guy should have been arrested, just giving some highlights of the article.
I would think that any report on the incident would include the accusation, but apparently that wasn't the case.

Honestly, the facts about what happened with the child are mostly irrelevant to the officer's reaction, unless there is some reason the officer would know those facts. From the information available, it seems that the officer responded to a call from the woman regarding a possible assault on a minor, then somehow turned that into not only a criticism on the woman's parenting but an implication that the accused man has the right to assault her son for littering. Whether the child actually was assaulted doesn't matter to the officer's conduct if the officer didn't know one way or the other.

Did the woman act poorly? Sure, but it didn't seem too egregious to me, particularly if she believed her young son had been assaulted and the officer responding to her call regarding the assault was dismissing it. I think most parents would be infuriated if they believed their 7 year old had been assaulted, and that fury would only be worsened by a police officer brushing the assault off, asking why some man doesn't have the right to assault their child, and instead questioning their own parenting skills.

The officer just seemed to me to be making the situation worse rather than trying to defuse it.

I think our perceptions of the video are the same.

My reasons for caution are the choppy nature of the video and how much of it may have been altered. I don't trust leftists when they thrust stories like this into viral headlines, because the story usually ends with the opposite being the truth.

I do agree that at face value, we see a cop respond to the complaint obtuse about the more egregious crime that was alleged and confrontational towards the complaining party. If that is the case the man has no business being a patrol officer because his judgement is poor.

Police should be members of the community they serve. However I have sheriffs from the most libturd infested county in TX in my neighborhood because they don't want to live in the county that commissioned them.

There's a reason for that, and it really is the crux of the problem.

There isn't a single edit in that video you fucking moron.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

If the boy did nothing to deserve such a response, the person who raised their hand to him should be busted for it. Its as simple as that. Who cares what color the people in the picture are or what color it is that they are not. If its not in self defense, then physical abuse is wrong.

God bless you always!!!

Holly