Black Establishment Endorses Clinton

[Dhara]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

 

[Dhara]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

You mean like corporate welfare? That kind of free shit?

 

[Dhara]

59 billion is spent on welfare while 92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies.

Sign In

 

[Dhara]

10 Taxpayer Handouts to the Super Rich That Will Make Your Blood Boil

 

[Si modo]

Hildebeast is a huge supporter of corporate welfare.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hildebeast is a huge supporter of corporate welfare.

Hildebeast is a huge supporter of corporate welfare.

especially when she's the corporation

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

You mean like corporate welfare? That kind of free shit?

You realize of course Hillary is in bed with corporate America, right? Google Goldman Sachs and Hillary Clinton

 

[Asclepias]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

You mean like corporate welfare? That kind of free shit?

The same free shit poor white conservatives get as well while voting against that same free shit out of stupidity.

 

[Asclepias]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

You mean like corporate welfare? That kind of free shit?

You realize of course Hillary is in bed with corporate America, right? Google Goldman Sachs and Hillary Clinton

Show me a politician that isnt?

 

[Asclepias]

Personally I believe Black people should never show their hand in who they are going to vote for. All Black people should register as Independents and see what all the parties have to offer. I'm guessing that the Dems would win most of our vote regardless but it would put the Dems on notice to not just pay us lip service.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

You mean like corporate welfare? That kind of free shit?

Well, let's think about that... how much do corporations contribute to the economy vs. welfare recipients? Which group do you believe generates the better ROI?

 

[Asclepias]

A University of Chicago study last year found that the policy preferences and desires of the black community are rarely reflected in national and state laws, with an inverse relationship between black support and a law’s chance of passage. (That’s true for Latinos and women as well.)

Examining a political candidate requires evaluating his or her policy positions, electability, and ability to get things done once in office. Given the Chicago study, any politician successfully advancing issues of importance to black Americans must measure the potential for legislative backlash. That could argue for black voters choosing candidates who know how to deal with the intricacies of Congressional deal-making, not just in public but behind the scenes. In other words: establishment politics.

The Black Establishment Chooses Clinton

Interesting. How will the RW appeal to black voters?

Free shit? Seems that is all that it takes...

You mean like corporate welfare? That kind of free shit?

Well, let's think about that... how much do corporations contribute to the economy vs. welfare recipients? Which group do you believe generates the better ROI?

People always generate the better ROI. People that suffer from the inability to think long term always think its the corporations.

 

[ClosedCaption]

59 billion is spent on welfare while 92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies.

Sign In

\
But that free shit is ok because by being rich they are entitled to their free stuff

 

[Dhara]

Personally I believe Black people should never show their hand in who they are going to vote for. All Black people should register as Independents and see what all the parties have to offer. I'm guessing that the Dems would win most of our vote regardless but it would put the Dems on notice to not just pay us lip service.

I think we should all do that. Polling is rarely accurate and if we all took advantage of our secret ballot voters would be better respected.

 

[Dhara]

59 billion is spent on welfare while 92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies.

Sign In

\
But that free shit is ok because by being rich they are entitled to their free stuff

Yep, it's odd that poor whites vote to help rich people have welfare.

 

[Si modo]

Personally I believe Black people should never show their hand in who they are going to vote for. All Black people should register as Independents and see what all the parties have to offer. I'm guessing that the Dems would win most of our vote regardless but it would put the Dems on notice to not just pay us lip service.

I think everyone, regardless of skin color, should do that - show the clueless Party leaders Americans are sick of their shit. Unfortunately, there are too many partisan groupies.

 

[TNHarley]

I would be down for no free shit for anyone. Our founders didn't flee totalitarianism to create more.

 

[Asclepias]

59 billion is spent on welfare while 92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies.

Sign In

\
But that free shit is ok because by being rich they are entitled to their free stuff

Yep, it's odd that poor whites vote to help rich people have welfare.

Its the implied message. Those poor whites always fall for the ruse that tells them the reason they are poor is because of the Blacks, Mexicans, Gays, and women that are having abortions.

 

[TNHarley]

59 billion is spent on welfare while 92 billion is spent on corporate subsidies.

Sign In

\
But that free shit is ok because by being rich they are entitled to their free stuff

Yep, it's odd that poor whites vote to help rich people have welfare.

Same thing with blacks voting against their own interests. Welfare isn't their interests. It is jobs. And the Ds LOVE to take them from them. Whether its "redistribution" policies that make corporations leave, minimum wage etc
Half, if not more, of our country are fuckin idiots.