Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
we dont need and amendment.
some arms are already banned
some arms are already banned
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep in mind, I am just thinking out loud here, as I do not know what the answer is. The question may become is it cheaper to outlaw the guns than to enforce a biometric trigger law.
Outlawing a right specifically granted by our constitution is not an option so why not focus on what can be achieved?
That's what Amendments are for....
Keep in mind, I am just thinking out loud here, as I do not know what the answer is. The question may become is it cheaper to outlaw the guns than to enforce a biometric trigger law.
Outlawing a right specifically granted by our constitution is not an option so why not focus on what can be achieved?
Whatch it... The idiots will come up with a new tax or special permit to solve the issue. Because we all know taxes will fix everything.
Along with stricter restrictions on the mentally unstables ability to purchase firearms?
Thoughts?
Biometric Trigger Lock ? The Next Generation In Gun Safety
An interesting concept. I wonder how gun enthusiasts would feel about it though.
An interesting concept. I wonder how gun enthusiasts would feel about it though.
If a criminal steals a gun, a lock is only a temporary barrier to its use. All locks can be defeated with a few basic tools. A regulation like this would only add to the legal cost of owning a weapon and would have very little effect on safety. Education would be more effective to protect children than any lock.
we can pass a law to ban semis right now.
the constitution allows it
It will be easy to find excuses NOT to try.
We could cut our aid to foreign countries by a small percentage to pay for a one time retrofit program. Anyone who doesn't utilize that opportunity would then have to pay themselves.
A means to the end can be found. Its just a matter of willingness.
It will be easy to find excuses NOT to try.
We could cut our aid to foreign countries by a small percentage to pay for a one time retrofit program. Anyone who doesn't utilize that opportunity would then have to pay themselves.
A means to the end can be found. Its just a matter of willingness.
I think you are missing the point. The purpose of gun ownership is to make an ostentatious display of stunning irresponsibility. A few folks actually hunt, engage in competitive shooting sports, or need a firearm in their occupation. A couple may actually have a good case based on personal safety. But the overwhelming majority want guns so they can kill people that irritate them, commit violent crimes, prepare to overthrow the government of the United States, or generally just bully and intimidate people.
I know lots of responsible gun owners and guess what? None of them are running around defending vigilantes, supporting guns for crazies, or supporting manufacturers of defective firearms. They also don't have dead children because they were too worried about losing two seconds before shooting someone and leaving guns unsecured in houses with small children.
Guns are all about macho for most folks, everything else is bullshit. Watch what they do, not what they say. Crazy is as crazy does.
we were discussing this earlier...a thumbprint lock that wouldnt allow anyone but the thumb print owner to remover the safety.....cost? to save a child's life? look if you can afford a bushmaster you can afford the extra cost of the lock
and if those two extra seconds cost the gun owner thier life?
Ah, casualty of liberal busybodyness.
Benefit #2 Fast and Easy to Use Another benefit of the fingerprint gun lock is that it is fast and easy to use. Simply apply your fingerprint and the lock will open. A gun lock that opens quickly and easily is important, especially in an emergency situation where you need to access your gun quickly.
we were discussing this earlier...a thumbprint lock that wouldnt allow anyone but the thumb print owner to remover the safety.....cost? to save a child's life? look if you can afford a bushmaster you can afford the extra cost of the lock
and if those two extra seconds cost the gun owner thier life?
Ah, casualty of liberal busybodyness.
Along with stricter restrictions on the mentally unstables ability to purchase firearms?
Thoughts?
Biometric Trigger Lock ? The Next Generation In Gun Safety
cut off the finger of the owner
Along with stricter restrictions on the mentally unstables ability to purchase firearms?
Thoughts?
Biometric Trigger Lock ? The Next Generation In Gun Safety
I have a biometric reader on my computer. I love the thing, most of the time, occasionally I have to reboot the computer because of a glitch on the sensor or the software. It isn't that big a deal, mostly because I never use my computer in a life and death situation, and I can always use the password if I don't want to reboot.
How long does it take to reboot a gun? Does anyone really want to trust their life to a computer that could hiccup at the most inconvenient time?
The article doesn't say anything about being able to change the biometric lock if you sell the gun, or inherit it from someone who passes away. Is it possible to do so, or do you have to trash the gun? And if it is possible to change the thumbprint, what's to stop a thief from having it changed?