Bill Gates wants to cure you to death

Bill Gates is supporting the development of immunological contraceptives?

Contraceptive vaccines are far more effective than a condom, and far safer than a vasectomy. Half of all unplanned pregnancies occur when conventional contraception fails. They will be a boon to society.

Gates isn't killing anybody.
 
Last edited:
Glaxo drug trial uses children from third-world countries, who are “pressured and forced into signing consent forms” – 12 babies dead seroxat secrets…


Glaxo drug trial uses children from third-world countries, who are “pressured and forced into signing consent forms” – 12 babies dead
July 13, 2008 — admin

This news coming in today from tradingmarkets.com – maybe it’ll give GSK’s Paul Blackburn some pause for thought as he has such “a passion for children”.

The Vaccines are Far More Deadly than the Swine Flu by Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Prof. Joe Cummins

Co-founder and president of NVIC Barbara Loe Fisher said [6]: "Parents and legislators should be asking themselves right now: Why are children the first to get experimental swine flu vaccines? Are schools equipped to get signed informed consent from parents before vaccination, keep accurate vaccination records and screen out children biologically at high risk for suffering vaccine reactions? Will people giving these vaccines know how to monitor children afterwards and immediately record, report and treat serious health problems that develop? And will states have the financial resources to compensate children who are injured?"
WHO and mass vaccination fever__The mass vaccination order has come from the World Health Organization (WHO) [8]. In early July 2009, a group of vaccination experts concluded that the pandemic is unstoppable, and Marie-Paul Kieny, WHO director on vaccine research said all nations will need access to vaccines, and that a vaccine should be available as early as September.

"Japanese Vaccine Trials in India." Makes one wonder why did they not use Japanese children for Japanese vaccine trials? JSTOR: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

Globalizing Clinical Research Big Pharma tries out first world drugs on unsuspecting third world patients
Globalizing Clinical Research
Big Pharma tries out first world drugs
on unsuspecting third world patients

By the end of July a US district court will decide whether drug giant Pfizer should stand trial in the United States for presiding over a coercive, botched 1996 experiment on Nigerian children with meningitis. In a class-action suit filed last August, thirty Nigerian families say the company violated the Nuremberg _ Code by forcing an unapproved, risky experiment on unwitting subjects who suffered brain damage, loss of hearing, paralysis and death as a result.
If allowed, the case will open a rare window on a business generally shrouded in FDA and Big Pharma secrecy: the global commerce in human experimentation. Over the past decade, the drug industry has quietly exported its clinical testing overseas, where oversight is slim and patients plentiful. According to a largely unnoticed Health and Human Services (HHS) report, the number of foreign investigators seeking FDA approvals increased sixteen-fold between 1990 and 1999. The actual numbers are probably much higher-companies aren't required to alert the FDA before taking their research overseas, nor does the FDA track research by location after approving new drugs.

The Vaccine Alert: GlaxoSmithKline Continues Vaccine Trial Even After 12 Babies Die
GlaxoSmithKline Continues Vaccine Trial Even After 12 Babies Die
Posted by Matt on Wednesday, October 7, 2009

According to an article at TradingMarkets.com, at least a dozen babies have died in a pneumonia vaccine trial conducted by GlaxoSmithKline in Argentina. The Argentina Federation of Health Professionals (Fesprosa) asserts that children of poor families are being used for the trials, and parents are bullied into signing consent forms. The trials are still continuing, even though at least 12 infants have already died.
The Vaccine Alert: Microchip Implant to Link Your Health Records, Credit History, Social Security

Microchip Implant to Link Your Health Records, Credit History, Social Security
Posted by Matt on Sunday, October 11, 2009
Bnet
October 11, 2009

Novartis and Proteus Biomedical are not the only companies hoping to implant microchips into patients so that their pill-popping habits can be monitored. VeriChip of Delray Beach, Fl., has an even bolder idea: an implanted chip that links to an online database containing all your medical records, credit history and your social security ID.

As this presentation to investors makes clear, the chip and its database could form the basis of a new national identity database lined to Social Security and NationalCreditReport.com. The VeriMed Health Link homepage describes the chip: … a tiny, passive microchip (the nation’s first and only microchip cleared for patient identification by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration) and a secure, private online database that links you to your personal health record. Your Health Link is always with you and cannot be lost or stolen.

That database can be accessed by doctors and nurses:

About the size of a grain of rice, the microchip is inserted just under the skin and contains only a unique, 16-digit identifier. The microchip itself does not contain any other data other than this unique electronic ID, nor does it contain any Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking capabilities. And unlike conventional forms of identification, the Health Link cannot be lost, stolen, misplaced, or counterfeited. It is safe, secure, reversible, and always with you.

But VeriChip’s ambitions don’t end there, as this diagram indicates:
Apparently they did not really mean it when they said they were abandoning human chips.
The Vaccine Alert: Microchip Implant to Link Your Health Records, Credit History, Social Security
Monday, August 11. 2008
Cancer Worries Prompt Verichip to Abandon Human Microchips
By Catherine Mullins

The VeriChip Corporation, manufactures of the VeriChip — the microchip made to be implanted in humans — has taken a considerable downturn after evidence has emerged showing the chip could cause cancer.

Human implantable Verichip is the size of a grain of rice.
John Birch Society | The size of two grains of rice, the tiny VeriChip, a microchip made to be implanted in the human body and transmit information about that person through radio signals, has huge Owellian implications. “The VeriChip Corporation markets the implant as a method of accessing medical records in an emergency, for use as a payment device, and as a way to control access to secure facilities,” consumer privacy advocate Katherine Albrecht describes in the newly released VeriChip FAQ. It sounds innocent enough, but numerous critics of the chip, including Dr. Albright, author of Spychips, How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFIDs, have brought to attention the fact “the implant could be surreptitiously used for tracking purposes through a network of local readers” by a government or agency that wanted to control a large group of people. Another risk is the possibility of hacking. David H. Holtzman in his Business Week article “Human ID Chips Get Under my skin,” pointed out: “All it would take is a careless employee to accidentally expose everyone’s number (the 16 digits on the chip that associate a person with his or her information) to an ill-intentioned hacker,” who then could use the personal information stored on a database in correlation to the numbers to access financial, medical, and security information about that person.

After the FDA approved these chips for use in humans, the reaction was intense. Groups began protesting the use of chips in humans, and numerous campaigns to prohibit foreseeable use of it began. Despite the controversy, the use of human “chipping” continued being discussed. Immigrants, the military, Alzheimer’s patients, and babies were the first candidates for being “chipped.”
 
This day has arrived.

"Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize an undercover dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing to one class of men, and deny equal privilege to others, will be to constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic, and have no place in a Republic. The Constitution of this Republic should make special privilege for medical freedom as well as religious freedom." abridged quote --Benjamin Rush, M.D., a signer of the Declaration of Independence
 
I may have to get a mac.
I doubt the opinion is any different with Jobs.
The squirrel brigade is going to save the world for our own good.

Bill Gates Talks About Vaccines to Reduce World Population
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=17644

Why use vaccines, mankind just needs another conventional world war.
More like mankind needs an education. Killing one another for the rich to "thin the herd" of it's so called "useless eaters" is a terrible mistake that will haunt all that chooses to go that route or agree with those practices.
 
The squirrel brigade is going to save the world for our own good.

Bill Gates Talks About Vaccines to Reduce World Population
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=17644

Why use vaccines, mankind just needs another conventional world war.
More like mankind needs an education. Killing one another for the rich to "thin the herd" of it's so called "useless eaters" is a terrible mistake that will haunt all that chooses to go that route or agree with those practices.

Just pointing out the obvious. You don't really believe mankind won't repeat the cycle do you?
 
There's plenty to dislike about Bill Gates (SouthPark's solution in their movie is a hoot), but this isn't one of them.

There is nothing wrong with developing new and improved forms of contraception. My only concern is that governments not mandate the use and force citizens to use them against their will. That is a public policy issue - not a fault of the vaccine.

Bill Gate's real danger (in addition to the horrors of the Windows platform) is his disdain for his wealth and the guilt he feels for earning it in a relatively free economy. His advocacy of high inheritance taxes while shielding his wealth in a tax exempt charitable trust (which will enable his children to live high on the hog via income from faux jobs) is hypocrisy in the extreme. He's got his, and to hell with the rest of us.

*happy mac user since 1987*

boe
 
Why use vaccines, mankind just needs another conventional world war.
More like mankind needs an education. Killing one another for the rich to "thin the herd" of it's so called "useless eaters" is a terrible mistake that will haunt all that chooses to go that route or agree with those practices.

Just pointing out the obvious. You don't really believe mankind won't repeat the cycle do you?

I believe there comes a point in time where good leaders understand war is a useless tool that creates a vicious cycle of hate.
 
More like mankind needs an education. Killing one another for the rich to "thin the herd" of it's so called "useless eaters" is a terrible mistake that will haunt all that chooses to go that route or agree with those practices.

Just pointing out the obvious. You don't really believe mankind won't repeat the cycle do you?

I believe there comes a point in time where good leaders understand war is a useless tool that creates a vicious cycle of hate.

Generally history has shown it's not the good leaders that start wars of aggression. The so called 'vicious cycle of hate' is also generally not the primary cause of wars.
Human nature is what it is and too many people have pollyannish ideals concerning this. Not to say wanting and striving for mankind's betterment isn't noble and sometimes fruitful but understanding there will always be Hitlers Stalins, Maos and Pol Pots in the world and being prepared for their eventualities is always a good thing.
 
Just pointing out the obvious. You don't really believe mankind won't repeat the cycle do you?

I believe there comes a point in time where good leaders understand war is a useless tool that creates a vicious cycle of hate.

Generally history has shown it's not the good leaders that start wars of aggression. The so called 'vicious cycle of hate' is also generally not the primary cause of wars.
Human nature is what it is and too many people have pollyannish ideals concerning this. Not to say wanting and striving for mankind's betterment isn't noble and sometimes fruitful but understanding there will always be Hitlers Stalins, Maos and Pol Pots in the world and being prepared for their eventualities is always a good thing.
I agree it is a good thing to prepare for and therefore we must watch for it. The names you mentioned are spirits in and of the world. It does not matter what the face or name is, the spirit is the same. Greed, control and fear mongering have lined many a rich man's pocket.
 

Forum List

Back
Top